We believe the dogma expressed
in the Nicene Creed, which states that
God the Father, God, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are Three Persons of the
One Almighty God. [Read more about the
Trinity]. The Three Persons of the Trinity are equally eternal, equally
God, equally uncreated. They are the One God in the One Being Who is Being
itself, Who is "I AM."
Creation and Fall
We believe that God created
the universe ex nihilo (out of nothing), starting with the creatures
of the praeternatural order (the angels), one of whom -- Satan, the Evil
One -- rebelled, taking a legion of angels with him; these evil ones are
known as demons.
Then God created the Heavens, earth and light on the first day; the firmament
on the second day; grass, herbs, and fruit trees on the third day; the sun,
moon and stars on the fourth day; the creatures of the water and air on the
fifth day; and, on the sixth day, the creatures of the land, and a man named
Adam. From Adam, He formed Eve.
God created man in His image -- whole, free, and filled with sanctifying
grace -- in a paradise known as Eden. But the Evil One tempted Eve to do
what God commanded them not to do, and Adam sinned by following suit. Because
of the sin of the first man, humankind lost its sanctifying grace and became
condemned not only to concupiscence (a propensity to fulfill carnal desires),
work, sickness, and death, etc., but to a loss of his likeness to God, and
to separateness from God -- a separateness from which we cannot be saved
except by the grace of God Himself. This loss of sanctifying grace is known
as "original sin." Original sin isn't personal sin (that is, sin resulting
from one's choices), but a lack of grace that we cannot overcome on our own.
Through Adam and Eve and "the Fall of Man," we are broken and in need of
redemption. Man cannot save himself and man-made utopia is not an option
We believe that the Old Testament tells the story of God's entrusting the
Israelites, through Abraham, to be His People, and that the Prophets of this
Old Covenant predicted the coming of the Messiah who would be able to reconcile
man with God.
We believe that Second Person
of the Trinity took on Flesh, by the Holy Ghost, through the ever-Virgin
Mary. Mary is the Ark of the New Covenant, the Theotokos
-- the God-Bearer -- in that she brought forth, through the Holy Spirit and
her Grace-inspired "YES," the Son of the Living God Whose Name is Jesus and
Who is the Messiah Whom the prophets foretold. Mary is not the mother of
God the Father or of God the Holy Spirit. She is the Mother of the Divine
Person Jesus, Who is God. The Christ's divine and human natures are in complete
hypostasis and cannot be separated, and mothers are the mothers of persons,
not "natures"; she is the Mother of the Person of Jesus, Who is God. She
is, therefore, the mother of God. Though veneration of Mary is only
because of her Son's grace, though she is not a "godess" in any way, and
though she is not to be worshiped as God, she is to be emulated, loved
and admired because she points the way to her Son. All generations will call
her blessed! (Luke 1:26-48)
We believe that Jesus was crucified for our salvation and that all salvation
comes from His sacrifice and only through His sacrifice. This Sacrifice
was necessary because God is holy, loving, jealous, and just, but our sins
are great and they offend Him. In order for God's honor -- offended by our
sins -- to be preserved and for His wrath at our sins to be assuaged, there
had to be atonement. In order for His holiness to not be offended and
for us to see Heaven (nothing unholy can enter Heaven!), the Second Person
of the Trinity Himself took on flesh and was crucified to satisfy the Father
for our sins. As Aquinas wrote
in his Summa Theologia, III, 49:
...Christ's Passion is in
two ways the cause of our reconciliation to God. In the first way, inasmuch
as it takes away sin by which men became God's enemies, according to Wisdom
14:9: "To God the wicked and his wickedness are hateful alike"; and Psalm.
5:7: "Thou hatest all the workers of iniquity." In another way, inasmuch
as it is a most acceptable sacrifice to God. Now it is the proper effect
of sacrifice to appease God: just as man likewise overlooks an offense committed
against him on account of some pleasing act of homage shown him. Hence it
is written (1 Kings. 26:19): "If the Lord stir thee up against me, let Him
accept of sacrifice." And in like fashion Christ's voluntary suffering was
such a good act that, because of its being found in human nature, God was
appeased for every offense of the human race with regard to those who are
made one with the crucified Christ in the aforesaid manner...
The Father sent the Son to
suffer and die because He loves us and wants us to be with Him, to share
in His divine nature -- something we can't do or earn on our own. So holy
is He and so poor are we! It is by the Passion and Blood of Jesus that the
Father is appeased, that we may be saved, and that the gates of Heaven are
opened up to us. By no other Name than Jesus can any man see the Father.
We believe that Jesus bodily rose again after His Crucifixion and ascended
into Heaven, sending the Holy Ghost after Him to sanctify, guide, and protect
His Church. His Resurrection is a sign of His promise to us for our own lives
if we believe, repent, are baptized, and obey the will of God as revealed
to us in His Sacred Scripture and through the infallible teachings of His
Church (i.e., the teachings handed down to us by Christ and the Apostles
or explicitly and solemnly defined by the Pope or Church
The Four Last Things:
Death, Judgment, Heaven, and Hell
We believe that when a person
dies, he faces a "particular judgement": he immediately goes to Heaven, to
Hell (including the possibility of Limbo for the unbaptized who are innocent
of personal sins), or to Purgatory. Purgatory is where those who, by the
Blood of Christ, are already saved from the eternal effects of sin
but who still have the temporal effects of sins on their souls go
to be cleansed ("purged") before they are allowed to see the face of God
when they enter Heaven (1 Corinthians 3:13-15, Hebrews 12:14, Hebrews 12:22-23,
1 Peter 4:6, Revelation 21:10-27). [Read more about
We believe that at the end of time, there will be a Last Judgement, when
the King of Kings, Christ Jesus, will come in glory, to judge the entire
world. This will happen after a Great Apostasy (which many traditional Catholics
believe we are very possibly seeing now given the state of our hierarchy),
a great Tribulation (from which the Church will not be spared via
a "Rapture"), and a final Antichrist who will deceive many into believing
he is a man of peace and justice. At this Last Judgement, the bodies of the
dead will be resurrected and reunited with their souls. The Evil One and
his demons will be thrown into the pit of Hell. Those bound for Hell will
go to Hell; those who are in Hell will remain in Hell. Those who are bound
for Heaven will go to Heaven, and those in Heaven will remain in Heaven,
their bodies glorified, to endure in the Presence of Love forever and ever,
world without end. [see End Times]
We believe that the Mystical
Body of Christ -- the nation of priests and kings, Israel, the Church --
is of three parts:
We believe that death does
not separate the members of His Church and that we are exhorted to pray for
one another and ask others to pray for us. [read more about
the Saints and
We believe that Jesus Christ is the spiritual Foundation Stone, the High
Priest and Head of the Church and that He authorized Peter, as the earthly
rock of the Church, to shepherd His sheep (Matthew 16:18-19). The Christ-given
authority entrusted to Peter and the other Apostles, with Peter as the Chief
Apostle, is passed on by "apostolic succession" through the Bishops, with
the Bishop of Rome as their source of unity and earthly king, and Christ
Jesus as King of Kings (Acts 1:21-26, 1 Timothy 1:6, 1 Timothy 4:14, 1 Timothy
5:22, and the unanimous agreement of early Christian writings). [read more
We believe that the gates of Hell will not prevail against the Church, that
while scandal may sometimes ensue, while Satan makes his efforts (as he is
doing now with great success), the Church's dogma will be kept pure in that
nothing against the Faith will be presented as infallible. We believe that
the Apostles and their successors were given authority by Christ to teach,
to interpret Sacred Scripture, to bind and loose, to exorcise demons, to
ordain, to baptize, annoint the sick, and administer the other Sacraments.
[read more about the Marks of
The Church Militant is made of the ritual Churches that are in communion
with the Petrine Ministry (the office held by the successors of Peter). The
particular churches in the full Catholic Communion use 6 different rites,
or traditions concerning how the Sacraments (see below) are to be offered.
These ritual churches of the One, True Church are dogmatically the same though
their points of theological emphasis (and language for their expression),
liturgical and devotional styles, canonical disciplines, martyrology (Saints
and martyrs that they honor), sacred art, etc., differ. Members of these
particular churches belong to the One, True, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic
Church, which is the Catholic Church, the Mystical Body of Christ.
The 6 main rites and the ritual Catholic churches of the One Catholic Church
The Roman Rite (The Mass
of St. Gregory the Great): the Latin Church (or the "Roman Church" --
the ritual Church most Westerners think of when they think of "the Catholic
Church" and whose Patriarch, the Bishop of Rome, is the Pope, who has primacy
over all the particular Churches that make up the Catholic Church). The most
prevalent current Roman Rite is the Protestantizedt, bastardized rite of
the 1969 Missale Romanum, but the ancient Latin Mass (often called the
"Tridentine Latin Mass" or "TLM"), unambiguous about the Mass's purpose and
devoid of Modernist tendencies, is also offered using the Missal of 1962.
To find a "TLM" near you, try
here for Masses offered
by the priests of the Society of St. Pius X, and
"indult" Masses offered by the priests of the Priestly Fraternity of St.
The Byzantine Rite (Liturgy
of St. James, St. Basil and Others): Albanian Church;
Belarussian/Byelorussian Church; Bulgarian Church; Croatian (Krizevci) Church;
Georgian Church; Greek Church; Hungarian Church; Italo-Greek (or Italo-Albanian)
Church; Melkite Church; Romanian Church; Russian Church; Ruthenian Church;
Serbian Church; Slovak Church; and the Ukrainian Church
The Alexandrian Rite (Liturgy
of St. Mark): Coptic Church; and the Ethiopian/Abyssinian Church. The
languages of these Churches are Coptic (Egyptian) and Ge'ez, respectively.
The Antiochian Rite (Liturgy
of St. James): Maronite Church; Syrian Church; and the Syro-Malankar
Church. The language of these Churches is Aramaic (ancient
The Chaldean Rite (Derived
from Antiochene Rite): Chaldean Church; and the Syro-Malabarese Church.
The language of these Churches is Syriac.
Armenian Rite (Greek Liturgy
of St. Basil)
Each Catholic ritual church
(known as a Church sui iuris) has its own Patriarch (sometimes called
a "Metropolitan" or "pope" -- i.e., "papa") who is in communion with the
Roman Pope, the man who holds the office of Peter. The (Roman) Pope has a
triple role as Bishop of Rome, Patriarch of the West, and Supreme Pontiff
of the entire Catholic Church.
Every Catholic, no matter his ritual church
1, believes the same dogma
and may receive the Sacraments of the Eucharist, Penance, and Unction from
any other ritual Catholic Church; in our union through the Petrine
ministry, we are all one as Christ desires [Matthew 12:25, 16:18, John 10:16,
John 17:20-23, Acts 4:32, Romans 12:5, Romans 16:17, 1 Corinthians 1:10-13,
Corinthians 3:3-4, Corinthians 10:17, Corinthians 11:18-19, Corinthians 12:12-27,
Corinthians 14:33, 2 Corinthians 12:20, Ephesians 4:3-6, Philippians 1:27,
2:2-3, 1 Timothy 6:3-5, Titus 3:9-10, James 3:16, 2 Peter 2:1].
The Church has two types of members: living members (those in a state
of grace, whether they be in the Church Militant, Suffering or Triumphant)
and dead members (those not in a state of grace, i.e., those in mortal
sin (I John 5:16-17), who are necessarily of the Church Militant). Dead members
cannot be saved unless they are reconciled and returned to a state of grace
through the Sacrament of Penance (or a perfect act of contrition if the Sacrament
No Salvation Outside of the Church :
"Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus"
There is no salvation outside
of Christ, and the Church is the Bride of Christ -- become His Body, one
Flesh in marriage. Therefore, there is no salvation outside of the Church
and not belonging formally to the Catholic Church is objectively sinful:
"If he will not hear the Church, let him be to thee as a heathen and a publican"
"He that heareth you heareth Me, and he that despiseth you despiseth Me,
and he that despiseth Me, despiseth Him that sent Me"
"He that believeth not will be condemned"
"He that believeth not is already judged"
"He that is not with Me is against Me and he that gathereth not with Me,
This does not mean, however,
that if one is necessarily damned if one is not a formal member of
the visible society of God's Kingdom on earth -- the One, Holy, Catholic
and Apostolic Church. What it means is that: Christ founded one Church with
Peter as His Vicar; that this Church was given the powers of binding and
loosing, that this Church exists today; that it is the source of the Gospel
and the earthly source of the Sacraments without which, normatively, one
cannot be saved. Those who are not formal members might be saved and
become associated with the soul of the Church if they:
are validly baptized by water
and spirit, in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost
(all who are baptized are subject to the Church even if they are not formal
members because Baptism belongs to the Church), and
have not committed a mortal
sin (or who, if they have committed a mortal sin, have made a perfect act
of contrition), which means a sin concerning a grave matter committed with
full knowledge and consent of the will, and
are animated by charity and
a supernatural Faith in God's existence, and
seek Him, and
firmly believe that their
religion is the true religion such that there is no conflict or doubt about
such in their ill-formed conscience, and
are not formally outside of
the Church in spite of doubts about the possibility that the Catholic Church
is the true Church of Christ (if one believes it is possible that the Catholic
Church is the true Church of Christ, one is duty-bound to investigate)
In addition, those individuals
who, through no fault of their own, have no means to hear of Christ-given
Baptism and are invincibly ignorant -- who've never heard the Name Jesus,
know nothing of the Church, or misunderstand Church teachings -- but who
obey the Natural Law written in all men's hearts and who truly seek God are
left to the mercy of Christ Who may save them as He desires. Christ will
judge our wills, hearts, intellects, and deeds, and shall have mercy and
compassion on whom He will have mercy and compassion (Romans 9:15); those
whom He deigns to save He can well give the grace of the Sacraments
to in a manner beyond our ken -- perhaps even in their final breath, by
illuminating their souls in a supernatural way such that they desire Baptism,
even if implicitly, and therefore become associated with the Soul of the
Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation. This is something
we can never presume -- but we can pray for.
I note here, too, that there is also the possibility of Limbo -- a state
of perfect natural happiness -- for those who die unregenerated (unbaptized)
and with the stain of original sin, but who've committed no personal sin.
While these people would not enter Heaven as they are not born again of water
and Spirit (or the desire for it), they would also experience no subjective
sufferings. This teaching is not a part of revelation and is, therefore,
not a matter of dogma. There is no consensus among the Church Fathers on
the matter; some believed in the existence of Limbo (e.g., most of the Greek
Fathers, St. Augustine in his early writings, St. Gregory Nanzianus, St.
Ambrose, St. Thomas Aquinas) while others didn't (e.g., St. Augustine in
his later writings, St. Anselm). But it is a most definite possibility that
can be piously believed given the truths that God is not only merciful but
just and, therefore, will not punish someone for that which involves no personal
guilt. While believing this proposition, which is the prevalent belief among
traditional Catholics, one must never forget how easy it is to sin -- and
that most everyone who's reached the age of reason has (in fact, because
of the rarity of those who've reached the age of reason and have not committed
personal sins, "Limbo" is often referred to as "Children's Limbo.")
These possibilities are left to the mercy of God, however, and the
presumption of salvation in any sense on the part of anyone who is
not a formal member of the the visible Church is a sin against the Holy Spirit.
We can pray for such, but we cannot presume such. We cannot presume
this association with the Soul of the Church on the part of any particular
individual who is not a manifest member the Church; in fact, we are to
presume the opposite because they are objectively in sin, even
if not culpably so, and we must do all we can to bring them to the Sacraments,
which are true media of grace. We are to preach the fullness of the Truth,
pray for God's mercy on all who are apart from the Sacraments, and always
remember that material heresy is still heresy, no matter the level of
culpability a material heretic might possess. While some who are not
formal members of the Church might be illumined before death such
that they desire Baptism and are then allowed to see Heaven by the Grace
of Christ and become, therefore, associated with the Soul of the Church,
the non-Catholic elements of other religions do not mediate grace
in and of themselves, and it is always God's will that all formally become
part of the eternally unified Mystical Body of Christ. The salvation
of these souls would be in spite of, not because of, their religion.
In this regard, any "ecumenism" that is not false will have as its goal the
bringing of all into the Church as formal members, be they Protestant, Jewish,
Buddhist, Muslim, Hindu, pagan, or secular. The goal of any true "ecumenism"
isn't "unity" because the Church is already unified; His Body is
already unified. The return of heretics, schismatics, and apostates
to the bosom of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Catholic Church is
the only goal of true ecumenism.
The proper attitude to take toward the Truth that those who are not formal
members of the Church might be saved if they meet the above criteria
is expressed well in this analogy by Harold E. Welitz:
Let's say that a father kept
a loaded gun in the house. Now, certainly it has occurred since the invention
of the revolver that a bullet has failed to fire when the trigger was pulled.
Therefore, based on this possibility should the father continually remind
his children that if they play with a gun and shoot at each other, it may
not go off? Would that be a wise and prudent father, one who truly cares
for his children? If the father continually discussed the possibility that
the gun may not go off if the trigger were pulled, would he be misleading
his children? Yes! Although what he is saying is not false, it is deceptive
because it implies that something that is rare is actually likely. The result
will be that the children will become more negligent in playing with loaded
guns, which most likely will kill one of them. Should the father not say:
"Do not play with a loaded gun, whatever you do! If you play with a loaded
gun, someone will get killed." A wise and prudent father may realize there
are a very slight percentage of bullets that are defective, but he knows
it is not wise to continually remind his children of this, lest they become
forgetful of the dangers of playing with loaded guns.
To carry the metaphor further:
Catholics don't let non-Catholics play with guns. When others do play with
guns, we can pray and have human hope that they don't get shot, but we can't
expect or have a "good hope" that they won't. If, in fact, they are
not "shot," we know that they are a part of the Church outside of which there
is no salvation.
Bottom line: We can't know the subjective states of the souls of manifest
heretics, and we can't know how God might or might not illumine the the souls
of the invincibly ignorant. But we can and do know what He has revealed about
Himself, and we must tell others this Gospel. We can and do know what He
told us about His Church, and we must bring people to it. We can and do know
what He told us to do, and we must do it. And we must do these things with
firmness, boldness, prudence, and great charity, all while begging mercy
for sinners, including ourselves.
The authority of the Church
rests on three pillars:
Scripture: The Bible
is the inerrant word of God and is to be read as the earliest Christians
read it: in the light of Tradition and under the guidance of those ordained
to teach. The Books of the Old Testament were put together by the Hebrews
in the Septuagint (ca 300 B.C.), which includes the seven Books called
"Deuterocanonical" by Catholics and "Apocryphal" by Protestants, and was
the Old Testament used by the Apostles. The Books of the New Testament were
made canonical over time and were first listed over 300 years after the
Resurrection. [see more on the Canon of the Bible
and the Septuagint and on Sola Scriptura:
The Fallacy of the Bible alone as the Rule of Faith]
Tradition: the teachings
which the Church has preserved and passed down from Christ, His Apostles,
and the unanimous teachings of the early Church Fathers (1 Corinthians 11:2,
2 Thessalonians 2:15, 2 Thessalonians 3:6).
(The above two pillars are
referred to as "The Deposit of Faith")
Extraordinary infallible teaching given in the very rare exercise of the
Pope alone, only when, in his capacity as Pastor and Doctor of all Christians
and by virtue of his supreme Apostolic authority, he defines a
dogma concerning faith and morals so as to be held by the whole Church
and does so ex cathedra -- i.e., "from the chair" of Peter.
Also called the "Solemn Magisterium."
Ordinary infallible teaching by Pope, Bishop, or anyone with the proper authority
to teach which illumines doctrine that has always been believed and accepted
by the universal Church. Also called the "Universal Magisterium" or the "Constant
Magisterium" and its exercise can be recognized when a teaching is one that
is has been held "always and everywhere" by the Church. [Note: some Catholics
forget this category of teaching and believe that only if a teaching
is solemnly defined ex cathedra is it infallible. These "Catholics,"
forgetting Tradition, are the "liberals" and "modernists" one always sees
Teaching by Pope, Bishop, or anyone with the proper authority to teach, that
does not fit into the above two categories. All authorized teaching
is owed proper, intelligent, prayerful religious assent, but
must be resisted if it leads to sin, compromises the Faith and the
salvation of souls, or contradicts the above two levels of Magisterium, the
Sacred Deposit of Faith, Scripture, and Tradition. [Note: some otherwise
wonderful Catholics forget this category of teaching and think everything
the Pope does and says is "infallible," an attitude that borders on papolatry.
These Catholics are the "neo-conservatives" or "neo-Catholics" who defend
the novelties since Vatican II and some of the scandalous behaviors of Bishops
and the Holy Father -- e.g., Qu'ran-kissing, ecumenism that leads to
indifferentism, etc. -- but while still truly trying to be orthodox.]
The Pope is supreme pastor,
the "King of Bishops," and he outranks all Bishops, individually or
collectively. "The Roman Pontiff has power over the entire Church, can
exercise power over all, whether over the whole or over one; he can exercise
power without being limited by anyone, neither Pastor nor faithful" (G. Siri,
La giovimzza della Chiesa).
However, of course, neither the Pope as Pontiff nor any Bishop can lawfully
or morally contradict Scripture or Tradition as interpreted and passed down
by the universal Church. Any teaching of Pope, Bishop, or Council that attempts
to nullify what has always been taught is null and void in se. In
other words, magisterium that contradicts former magisterium is not infallible
magisterium. From Pastor Aeternus, section De Romani Pontificis
Infallibili Magisterio of Vatican I:
For the Holy Spirit was promised
to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by His revelation, make
known some new doctrine, but that, by His assistance, they might religiously
guard and faithfully expound the revelation or Deposit of Faith transmitted
by the Apostles.
Doctrine and dogma may be
clarified, explained more fully, and be more explicitly defined, but they
cannot be contradicted by anyone, by neither Pope nor Council.
The Seven Sacraments or "Holy Mysteries"
The Church has 7 Sacraments
-- "outward signs of invisible grace" and media of sanctifying grace.
The Sacraments were given to us by Christ so that we may receive His grace
and become more like Him. The Seven Sacraments are:
Baptism: with immersion
in water, sprinkling of water, or the pouring of water over the skin of the
forehead while the words "I baptize thee in the Name of the Father, and of
the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" (or "Holy Spirit") are said by one who intends
to initiate the baptized into the Christian life, one is baptized for the
remission of all sins, both original sin and personal sins, and their effects.
Through Baptism in the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost (Matthew
28:19), we are born again (John 3) of water and of the Spirit and enter into
the New Covenant. This is the initial rite of Christian initiation (Acts
2:38-39, Acts 16:32-35, Ephesians 4:3-5, Colossians 2:11-12, Didache ch.
7), and all who are baptized with water and Spirit, using these words, by
anyone (layman or priest) who intends to do what the Church does, is validly
baptized -- whether they are baptized by Pentecostals, Baptists, Orthodox,
etc. -- and cannot be re-baptized. If one desires to formally join the Catholic
Church but is unsure about the validity of his baptism, he is conditionally
baptized with water and the words, "If thou art not baptized, I baptize thee
in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost."
Baptism replaces circumcision (Colossians 2:1112), and just as children
were circumcized at the age of 8 days in the Old Covenant, children, even
infants, are welcome in God's Kingdom and are baptized as soon as possible
(Matthew 19:14, Luke 18:1516, Acts 2:39). This is the early practice
of the Church, as evident by St. Paul's baptizing of entire households (Acts
16:15, 1 Corinthians 1:16) and the words of Christ and His Apostles (Mark
10:14, Acts 2:38-39). [Read more about Baptism]
Aside from the Baptism by water and Spirit, without the graces of which one
can't be saved, there are the analogically-named "Baptism of Blood" and the
"Baptism of Desire." Baptism of Blood is martyrdom -- that is, dying for
the sake of the Faith. Baptism of desire is the vow to receive Baptism by
one who has a a living faith and the desire to do all the Lord commands,
but who doesn't have the earthly possibility of water baptism (or who dies
before receiving it). Baptism of Blood and Baptism of Desire both have the
saving effects of water Baptism, by the mercy of Christ.
or the "Sacrament of the Seal"): Confirmation is the laying on of hands
by a Bishop or authorized priest and becoming sealed to the Holy Ghost, becoming
annointed spiritually and, literally, with sacred oil -- a consecrated olive
oil called "chrism" or "oil of gladness." Confirmation is becoming infused
with the Holy Ghost, sealed to Him by grace and fortified in becoming true
soldiers of Christ (Acts 8:14-17, Acts 19:5-6, 2 Corinthians 1:21-22,
Ephesians 1:13, Hebrews 1:9, Hebrews 6:1-6).
We believe that at Mass (the "Divine Liturgy") the bread and wine truly
become the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ glorified and that
no one should eat of it unworthily (John 6, Luke 22:19, John 6:52-58, Acts
2:42, 1 Corinthians 10, 1 Cor. 11:27-29, Ignatius of Antioch's Letter to
the Smyraeans, Didache ch. 9 ). The Eucharist should only be received by
the baptized who are in a state of grace (who have no unconfessed mortal
sins on their soul), and after prayer and fasting. The bread used must be
made only of wheat and water (nothing else may be added, though leaven
is used in Eastern Churches); the wine must be true grape wine. The one offering
the Mass at which the bread and wine become Christ must be a validly ordained
priest using the proper form. See "Mass/Divine Liturgy" below.
(In the Eastern Catholic Churches,
three Sacraments are received at the same time, even infants.)
Penance ("Confession" or
"Reconciliation"): We confess our sins to God, in the presence of his
priests (through his priests), so that we can be freed from their
eternal effects and reconcile with Him and with His Church (Matthew 9:5-8,
Matthew 16:18-19, 1 Corinthians 11:27-29, 2 Corinthians 5:18, James 5:14-16,
Didache 4:14, 14:1). For there to be a valid confession, one must confess
his sins, with a contrite heart and the desire for pardon, to a priest with
jurisdiction (ordinary or supplied) who uses the proper form of absolution,
which is the words "Ego te absolvo" ("I absolve you"). If no priest is available,
one may make an act of perfect contrition, confessing to God directly and
begging forgiveness (one must resolve to go to a priest when one is available
for a perfect act of contrition to be valid). Confession of sins to other
Christians is a sacramental which remits venial sins and is encouraged, but
it is not a Sacrament.
Holy Matrimony: See
Matthew 5:31-33, Matthew 19:8-10, Mark 10:10-12, Luke 16:17-19, 1 Corinthians
7:10-11. The Sacrament of Matrimony is the covenental joining of the validly
baptized Bride and Groom as head of their own little domestic "church" and
the source of their spirit of self-sacrifice that allows them to put their
children first. A valid Sacramental marriage has as its primary purpose the
begetting and raising of children; the unitive aspects of marriage are secondary.
Marriage, therefore, is open to life if the marital right (the right of each
spouse to the other's body, 1 Corinthians 7:4) is exercised. In the rare
instance that both spouses mutually consent to not exercise
their marital rights and decide to remain sexually continent in imitation
of Joseph and Mary and for the sake of the Kingdom, the marriage is termed
a "Josephite marriage."
"What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder": marriage
lasts until the death of one of the spouses (Mark 10:11-12). "Re-marriage"
after separation (as in physical separation due to threats of physical danger)
in a valid, Sacramental and consummated marriage is impermissible.
A declaration of nullity ("annulment") is not a "Catholic divorce" (though,
sadly, it is too-often treated as such by many modern hierarchs); it is a
Church tribunal's finding that a valid Sacramental marriage never existed
in the first place (i.e., God did not join the two in the first place) because,
at the time the vows were exchanged, certain conditions were present
indicating that one of the couple did not intend for a valid, Sacramental
marriage to take place. Some of these conditions are impotence, unwillingness
to be open to procreation if the marital right is exercised, unwillingness
to commit to fidelity, etc..
For there to be a valid Sacramental marriage, there must be none of the
impediments listed above, the two must be validly baptized, and both must
mutually consent to marriage. The man and woman act as minister (the priest
presides, but does not marry them; they marry each other).
Holy Orders ("Ordination"):
the integration of men into the order of bishops, presbyters, or deacons
which confers a gift of the Holy Ghost that permits the exercise of a sacred
power (sacra potestas) which can come only from Christ Himself, through
his Church, by the laying on of hands by a true Bishop in the line of Apostolic
Luke 10:16, John 13:20, John 15:5, John 20:21, Acts 14:23, Romans 10:15,
2 Corinthians 5:20, 1 Timothy 4:14, 1 Timothy 5:23, the Book of Hebrews).
In the Latin Church's discipline, only unmarried men can become ordained.
In many of the Eastern Churches, married men can become ordained, though
they may not marry after ordination and may not become Bishops. In
the early Church, married priests were sexually continent (abstinent); it
is this Tradition that lives on only in the sexually continent and celibate
(unmarried) priesthood of the Latin Church and in those Eastern Catholic
priests who are sexually continent, whether celibate or not. See Canon 33
of the Council of Elvira (A.D. 300-306); Canon 1 of the Council of
Neocæsarea (A.D. 315); Canon 3 of the Council of Carthage (A.D. 390);
Canon III of the Quinisext Council of Trullo (A.D. 691) which speaks of the
Eastern Churches changing their chastity rules while "they of the most holy
Roman Church purpose to keep the rule of exact perfection," etc.
Women cannot and will never be ordained into the priesthood, though
a female diaconate of sorts is part of our Tradition insofar as women, referred
to as "deaconesses," sometimes helped minister to other women in the early
Church (moreso in the East) when it came to such things as the Baptism of
other women by immersion, where modesty was an issue, and caring for the
sick. They were not, however, priests, they did not receive the Sacrament
of Holy Orders, etc. (see Canon 19 of the First Council of Nicaea, 325
Extreme Unction ("Sacrament
of the Sick"): See Matthew 10:1, Luke 9:1-2, Luke 9:6, and James 5:13-15.
the annointing before death with consecrated olive oil is known as "Last
Rites" or "Extreme Unction," and the Eucharist itself that is given at that
time is known as "Viaticum" ("food for the journey" from the Latin
viaticus meaning "journey". Unction purifies the soul by remitting
sins, and heals the body if it is God's will.
Sacraments are not magic:
while they impart sanctifying grace, in order for those who've reached
the age of reason to benefit from them, he must receive them with the proper
intention; in other words, they require faith! If one has attained
the age of reason, for ex., and does not believe in Christ but is baptized,
objectively, true grace is given, but, subjectively, he will receive the
fruits of his Baptism only when/if he later believes. The Sacrament
of Confession, as an other example, requires true contrition (e.g., one can't
knowingly commit a sin, go to Confession without true repentance and while
planning on committing that same sin again, and expect to receive Sacramental
The Sacraments are also normatively required: for example, if one is in the
middle of a desert and no water is available to conduct the rite of Baptism
in the proper way, as Christ desires we be baptised, one is still "baptised"
by desire if he would be baptized in the proper way if the means were available
to him. This does not make the rites less important; it only demonstrates
the power of Christ's mercy. One who has no priest available may make a spiritual
Communion and receive the fruits of the Eucharist. A perfect act of contrition
can give one the fruits of Confession even though no priest is available.
And so on. The point: God is not bound by the Sacraments; we are bound
by the Sacraments!
The Sacraments also are not human works; they are the work of Christ operating
through the priest (or other minister, as in some cases of Baptism and in
Matrimony), and their effectiveness does not depend on the personal holiness
of the minister. The necessary elements are that the priest have proper power
and authorization, the proper intention, and that he uses the prescribed
matter (e.g. water, oil, bread made of wheat and water, etc.) and form (i.e.,
the rite must be properly performed). In other words, if these things are
followed, the Sacraments give sanctifying grace in a manner known
as ex opere operato, or "by the deed done" -- by the very fact of
the action. The grace is fruitful depending on the faith of the one who receives
the Sacrament (or the faith of his parents, in the case of infant
The Most Sacred Mystery of the Eucharist
Christ is our High Priest
after the order of Melchizedek -- and in order for a priesthood of any kind
to exist, there must be a sacrifice. When we go to Mass (the Divine Liturgy),
the Sacrifice of Christ's once and for all, historical Passion and Crucifixion
is re-presented; it is not repeated in any sense of Christ "dying again."
While the Crucifixion was a specific, finite historical event from our
physics-bound point of view, God is transcendent and outside of time, and
Christ's offering of Himself is eternal. As one apologist puts it,
"One can't 'repeat' what has never ended!"
At the Mass, the bread and wine become the sacramental
Presence of Jesus Christ. It is not only "symbolic"; it is the real, true
bringing-forth of the glorified Body and Blood of our Lord, Who is
then offered to appease the Father as a perfect Sacrifice -- a re-presentation
of Christ's Historical and perfect, once and for all Sacrifice at Calvary.
This offering was predicted (see Malachi 1:1011) and was believed
to be sacrificial and propitiatory in nature by the very earliest
Christians (I challenge all who call themselves Christian to
research this! Read Ignatius, John Chrystostom, Pope Clement I, Justin Martyr,
the Didache -- any of the very earliest Christians' writings!).
The reality of the Presence of God in the Eucharist is made clear in the
6th chapter of John, and Luke 22:19-20 minces no words when it says "This
IS my Body... This IS my Blood." The Jews in John 6, even some of His followers,
walked away from Him out of disgust over this teaching, but Jesus didn't
backtrack at all; He maintained that we must eat His Flesh and drink His
Blood. The Temple walls fell as Jesus said they would, and those "last days"
of the Old Covenant have ended. But the Sacrifice continues with Christ's
eternal offering to us the gift of Himself. The New Covenant is here, and
we are all invited to enter into it! The tabernacle lamps still burn brightly
in Catholic churches... (at least the ones that follow pre-Vatican II
In our liturgy, Christ's ordained priests offer Christ under the appearances
of bread and wine (Genesis 14:18, Psalm 110:1-4, Malachi 1:1011, John
6:5358) as a pure sacrificial offering to the Father in order to appease
Him; Christ offers Himself to us by His Real Presence in the Eucharist after
the Holy Ghost changes these gifts from "bread and wine" into Sacrament;
and we, members of the royal priesthood (what Protestants call "the priesthood
of believers"), offer ourselves to God, worshipping Him with the angels in
Heaven who sing "Holy, Holy, Holy!" without ceasing. (Listen to Real Audio
lessons about the Eucharist at the bottom of the
Scott Hahn Apologetics page of this site,
and listen to how the Book of Revelation (Apocalypse)
describes, in part, the Heavenly liturgy)
In the Old Testament, the
Israelites upheld their Covenant with God by keeping Moses' Law and, of course,
the great Commandments. Christians are freed from The Law (later twisted
into Talmudism by the Pharisees) and enter into the New Covenant by Baptism.
We are saved by the grace of His Passion and Blood alone, a grace we have
to actively cooperate with through metanoia (repentance and a turning of
the heart toward Christ), submitting our wills to our Father's, and obedience.
When we enter into this Covenant, we literally become His children,
His family. God the Father becomes for us Abba and Christ seals us
to Him with His own Blood. Our task -- and our reward -- is to "become divinized"
(to undergo "theosis"), to "put on Christ" and share in the Divine Energies
of God and Christ's Sonship. We become the heirs of God Himself. In
this divinization, this theosis, His Chosen will share in God's divine nature
(2 Peter 1:4) -- but still as creatures of God and not as God Himself or
in any way apart from God. We will forever and always be creatures, "becoming
God" by sharing in His divine nature, but never in His divine essence --
and never, ever apart from God, which is the lie Satan first told to Eve.
The created can never become Uncreated.
We agree entirely with the many Protestants who say one has to "have a personal
relationship with Jesus" or "let Jesus into one's heart" if, by that, they
mean that we are to pray earnestly, walk the walk, make His Will manifest
in our lives, preach the Gospel, etc. We are to turn our hearts toward Christ!
We must experience true conversion! We believe, too, that no aspect of our
relationsip with Christ can be more intimate and awesome than by prayerfully
and humbly receiving Him through the Eucharist and receiving His graces through
His other Sacraments!
We refute the idea that all one needs to do in order to be saved is to say
"The Sinner's Prayer" (though it is a nice prayer, as far as it goes); we
believe that we are to work out our salvation in fear and trembling (Philippians
2:12) lest we be cast away (I Corinthians 9:27) -- but always with the knowledge
of God's Fatherly Love and Mercy for us, His adopted children. Likewise,
we reject the idea that one can work his way into Heaven or that any Christian's
works have salvific merit outside of Christ's grace. Neither faith alone,
nor works alone, nor faith and works together saves us or puts God into debt
to us; He owes us nothing! Neither getting on your knees once and saying
the "Sinner's Prayer," no matter how sincerely, nor a lifetime working at
soup kitchens, but without faith and the Sacraments, will save you. It is
His grace alone that saves -- a grace we accept in faith and
by doing His will!
Though we believe in predestination (Ephesians 1:11), we see it as an inscrutable
Mystery, and we reject any ideas of predestination that deny the free will
of man or which make God the Author of sin by seeing Him as also predestining
some souls to go to Hell (i.e., as in any idea of "double predestination").
We assert that we are created by God in His image, that He created us freely
able to choose Him or to choose sin, and that predestination beyond recognizing
His omniscience, would render His divine plan meaningless. We believe that
free will exists both before and after justification. In other words, a person
who enters the Covenant may freely leave it and lose his salvation (2 Peter
2:20-21). While we do believe that whom God elects, He will save, we don't
presume to know who the elect are (I Corinthians 4:4)! This is a Mystery
of God that we can't presume to know, let alone base an entire theology and
Summary: We are saved by grace alone, through a saving faith
(i.e., a faith that works in love, Galatians 5:6), and as a
fruit of Christ's having suffered and shed His blood for us. Christianity
is both a "head religion" and a "heart religion"; we intellectually assent
to the Truths given to us by the Church through Her Scripture and Sacred
Tradition, and these Truths affirm that we must give our hearts to Jesus.
In other words, we are to love God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength
(Mark 12:30). To focus only on the heart without including the mind (i.e.,
to forget doctrine and rely on "experience" and "feelings") is to lapse into
heresy and subjectivism; to focus on the intellect without including the
heart (i.e., to forget humility, repentance, and, above all, charity) is
to lapse into a legalistic Pharisaism. [Read more about
To be saved: believe and trust in Jesus, repent of your sins, be baptized,
receive the Eucharist, and obey the will of God as taught to us in the Bible
and the constant teachings of the Church. Love God with all your heart and
mind and soul and strength, and love your neighbor as yourself.
We absolutely reject the prevalent
idea that the most important aspect of Christ's Incarnation was His preaching
of "tolerance" and "sentiment" and "non-judgementalism." The idea that Jesus
was merely a "great teacher" is a most poisonous doctrine that renders Christ
not only no more profound than a Hallmark card, but a liar to boot. If "luv"
is the centrality of the Christian message, then any hippie-chick would have
served the purpose as well, and if "wise sayings" were all He was about,
then any Confucius would do. If "feel-goodism" was His driving motivation,
He could've sent Oprah Winfrey in His place.
This idea is most egregious when what Christ preached is twisted into banalities.
There seems to be the popular opinion out there that Jesus was a feminist
political revolutionary Whose main purpose for taking on Flesh was to present
an example of how to bring down "the man" and eradicate "bad feelings" between
culturally diverse groups and the sexes. To these people, He never got
righteously angry. He never spoke of sin and Hell. He never told people to
sin no more after forgiving them -- and He'd forgive people whether they
were repentant or not. They think that even though He created us male and
female, He sees no difference in the sexes at all (He must've been playing
a joke on us on that 6th Day of Creation!). This "Jesus" is not the Jesus
of the Gospels.
Yes, Christ is a great Teacher. Yes, He is the Divine Physician. Yes, He
is forgiving and most merciful. But He also demanding, a Savior Who said
"If a man does not abide in Me, he is cast forth as a branch and withers;
and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire and burned" (John 5:6)
and "whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either
in this age or in the age to come" (Matthew 12:32). He called the Pharisees
"broods of vipers" and sons of the Devil who worshipped at the "synagogue
Yes, He loves children, and the poor, the sick, the suffering -- alleluia!
But He knows, too, when you're trying to pull one over on Him and squeak
your favorite sin past Him in the name of "social justice" and "tolerance."
He is not only Jesus the Bridegroom-Lover, He is Jesus the Judge and King
of Kings. Never forget it.
Most important, though, is that He is the Man of Sorrows, the One by Whose
stripes we are healed (Isaiah 53:3-5). Had He not suffered for us and offered
Himself up to appease the Father's honor, we would be doomed, period, the
end. This is the central Christian message, and this is why "we preach Christ
crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness"
(1 Corinthians 1:23). Yes, we preach Christ risen, too (that's why we worship
on Sundays) -- but it is His Blood that saves us, and we are exhorted to
pick up our crosses and follow Him. The hyper-focus on the Resurrection at
the expense of the Cross is a false focus that leads to a false gospel.
What was His purpose? Why did He come? Let Him tell
you with the words He spoke just before His Passion began:
And Jesus answered them, saying, The hour is come, that the Son of man should
be glorified. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall
into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth
much fruit. He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his
life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal. If any man serve Me,
let him follow Me; and where I am, there shall also My servant be: if any
man serve Me, him will my Father honour. Now is My soul troubled; and what
shall I say? Father, save Me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto
this hour. [NLT: "But that is the very reason why I came"!]
And what should be our reaction
to His purpose? To think "Gee, thanks, Jesus! Now let's just focus on the
happy stuff -- the Resurrection, the Ascension, the Pentecost? Let's all
babble in "tongues" and put on our happy grins? Let's forget the Cross and
morph the Gospel into "health and wealth" preaching" and "name it and claim
it" nonsense"? Let's not admonish the sinner lest we sound too mean? No.
Our reaction should be like the reaction of St. Paul:
Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the
knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all
things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, and be found in
Him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which
is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:
That I may know Him, and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship
of His sufferings, being made conformable unto his death; If by any
means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.
2 Corinthians 4:8-12
We are troubled on every side, yet not distressed; we are perplexed, but
not in despair; persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed;
always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that
the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body. For we which live
are always delivered unto death for Jesus' sake, that the life also of Jesus
might be made manifest in our mortal flesh. So then death worketh in us,
but life in you.
Again and again I say, relating
St. Paul's teachings: we get to the Resurrection through the Cross!
This is not to ever deny or forget the Resurrection, the Ascension, and the
Pentecost (the commemoration of all of these being Holy Days of Obligation
for Catholics!). It's not to deny the true joy that comes from knowing Who
He is. It's not to ignore the Joyful and Glorious Mysteries (which we Catholics
pray in our Rosaries, too, along with the Sorrowful Mysteries). No! But it
is to maintain proper focus and to receive our consolations and gifts
from the Comforter along with the sufferings we must endure in imitation
of Christ. We will not have our own resurrections if we do not pick up our
crosses and continue to offer Him up to the Father -- to ask the Father to
look at Him instead of us -- and at Him in us.
We absolutely and totally
acknowledge the Gifts of the Holy Spirit and the charismata (they being subject
to authority and having changed since the Pentecost), but see clamoring after
signs, wonders, supernatural gifts, and emotional highs as dangerous, especially
given the too-common lack of discernment of the spirits.
The experience of the traditional Mass is an entirely different sort of thing
than, say, the experience of Charismatic Pentecostal services: the Mass is
a true sacrifice in which we offer the Son to the Father as the spotless,
pure Offering predicted in Malachi 1:10-11, and prefigured by the Passover
lamb that the Israelites had to eat. We meet Almighty God in the Presence
of the Eucharist -- an awesome, reverent, and humbling experience when seen
through the eyes of faith. Our somber prayerfulness in no way indicates that
we are "spiritually dead" (a common accusation) any more than a quiet moment
watching your child, marvelling at his existence, means you are not in love
with that child just because you're not running around and playing with him.
The once and for all Sacrifice at Calvary, which is what is re-presented
at the Mass, calls for awe, humility, and gratitude, not glee, giddiness,
"holy laughter," rocking-and-rolling, hand-clapping, roaring like lions,
Are some Catholics spiritually dead? Of course. Are some non-Catholics
spiritually dead? Of course. Let's pray for them. But let's not confuse worship
with entertainment or with fellowship, for which Catholics have prayer groups,
Bible Studies, youth groups, groups for seniors, singles' groups, gatherings
for charitable and social causes, and most of all, families. And let's not
confuse our emotions with our virtue. Any Beatles concert could make a lot
of girls faint and feel "high," and a hit of Ecstasy or a line of
cocaine can make you feel warm-fuzzies. I'm sure we've all met those
"happy drunks" who take a drink and "love everyone." There's nothing wrong,
of course, with "emotional highs" (some Catholics get them all the time at
Mass), but we should never mistake our "feelings" for good theology or a
well-formed conscience. "Feeling good" is a great and welcome but unecessary
and potentially misleading phenomenon.
The rousing, "can't hear it and remain seated" Gospel music? Amen (as long
as the lyrics don't contradict the Faith)! What's more fun than that? But
not at the Mass, where we are at the foot of the Cross.
Lengthy talks by guest speakers filled with exuberant gestures, visual aids,
and such? Sure! But not at the Mass, where we are at the foot of the Cross
(and never from manifest heretics posing as "Catholics" or leaders thereof).
Dancing in honor of God? Casual, laid-back "fellowshipping" atmosphere? At
a party, yes, but not at the Mass, where we are at the foot of the
... the Mass itself must remain not only sacred, beautiful, reverent, but
in line with the liturgical heritage given to us by the faithful Hebrews
and Church Fathers, its sacred purposes given to us by Christ, its secondary
catechetical effects, and Natural Law. It must always be remembered that
at the Mass, we are at the foot of the Cross!
In addition, it must be remembered that it has always been traditional
Catholic worship (as opposed to post-Vatican II, Protestantized craziness)
that is replete with profound, emotion-provoking details. While, now,
evangelicals are flocking to see Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ"
and having intense emotional reactions (a wonderful thing), we Catholics
have always meditated on His Passion (note: it is His Passion and Blood that
saves us, not His Resurrection alone). When we pray the Sorrowful Mysteries
of the Rosary, when we make the Stations of the Cross, that is what we are
doing, and have been doing for two millennia. We meditate on His Sacred Heart,
full of love for mankind and wounded by our sins. We meditate on His Incarnation
and what it means for the dignity of man. We meditate on the hopelesness
of life without Him during our Tenebrae services before Easter time -- and
all in emotionally moving ways. There is no moment more glorious and joyous
than the unveiling of the icons and ringing of the bells at the Easter Vigil,
when we commemorate Christ's Resurrection. Now evangelicals are re-discovering
the power of the tangible through Gibson's movie, and are buying up "Crucifixion
Nails" to wear around their necks. But we Catholics have preached Christ
crucified (1 Corinthians 1:23) -- and risen! -- and have worn Crucifixes
and carried nails forever.
We reject Puritanism and its
ideas that flesh is evil and that God's creation is not a gift to be gratefully
enjoyed to our true benefit. We regard nature, though broken, as almost
sacramental -- a visible sign of His glory, and we regard all that is true
and beautiful as pointing straight to our Lord. Our churches that we adorn
with icons and/or statues of Christ, His Mother and the other Saints, in
no way, shape, or form indicate that orthodox Catholicism is "of the flesh"
in the sense of being wordly. We are not "of the world", but we are obviously
in the world. We are on earth, in time, made partly of flesh. This
is how God made us. He made matter and said it was good, very good. But it
Our regard for beauty and the created order, and our use of them to help
us meditate on the Holy is not what Catholicism is all about any more than
your new sofa, bedroom suite, and matching sheets are what your home is all
about. Your home is where you live. It is a place you cherish. It is where
your family is. You want it to be beautiful. It is the same with our Catholic
churches where, in the Tabernacle, in the Holy of Holies, Christ is. We want
them to be beautiful, too! (Exodus 25:18-22, Exodus 26:1, 1 Kings 6:23-28,
Ezekiel 41:17-19, Revelation 5:8) [Read more about the use of
statues and icons and
The Church Today
The human element of the Church
today is greatly confused and under siege by the Evil One (the Church Herself,
though, is and always will be Holy, the spotless Bride of Christ, perfect
in every way).
Since the French Revolution, our Popes have warned with greater intensity
that "impious men" have the destruction of the Church as their goal. In 1907,
Pope St. Pius X wrote an encyclical,
Pascendi Dominici Gregis, which
described their actions and warned that those men were even then
to be sought not only among
the Church's open enemies; but, what is to be most dreaded and deplored,
in her very bosom, and are the more mischievous the less they keep in the
open. We allude, Venerable Brethren, to many who belong to the Catholic laity,
and, what is much more sad, to the ranks of the priesthood itself, who, animated
by a false zeal for the Church, lacking the solid safeguards of philosophy
and theology, nay more, thoroughly imbued with the poisonous doctrines taught
by the enemies of the Church, and lost to all sense of modesty, put themselves
forward as reformers of the Church; and, forming more boldly into line of
attack, assail all that is most sacred in the work of Christ, not sparing
even the Person of the Divine Redeemer...
Encyclical after Encyclical
warned about Freemasonry and its goal of destroying Christendom and replacing
it with man-centered government and Satanic religion filled with errors.
The ambiguities and typical interpretations of the Second Vatican Council
(1962-1965) was the triumph of these evil-doers. Though it was a non-dogmatic,
pastoral Council which produced mostly fallible documents and taught no solemn
teachings that Catholics must believe as an article of the Faith (see
Pope John XXIII's Opening Address), its
documents are marked by ambiguity which was later used by liberals to twist
Church teaching and destroy the liturgy and traditional practices in the
institutional Church. Most Catholics have followed these liberals blindly
out of a false sense of obedience. If you become Catholic today, you
must study pre-conciliar catechisms and encyclicals, come to
a very clear understanding of what is and isn't infallible, get a clear notion
of true obedience as opposed to false and blind obedience, and know the true
definition of schism. Without these tools, you will be lost and utterly confused
as to what is Catholic and what isn't because, even at the very highest levels,
our hierarchs are misleading us and heading toward apostasy.
Know, despite the profusion of bad Bishops and priests, and the weakness
and often bad example of even the Holy Father himself, that what the Church
has always taught for 2,000 years is still true, that the gates of Hell will
never prevail, and that the Church exists wherever validly ordained priests,
the true Faith, the true Sacraments, the true Sacrifice, and holy submission
to the legitimate successor of Peter are found (this is as opposed to unholy
submission to the Pontiff).
Sadly, the chances are good that this won't be at your nearest Catholic
parish. If you become Catholic, prepare to deal with confusion at first,
and dissonance between what is presented as Catholic teaching and
what you learn is Catholic teaching. The author of confusion (1
Corinthians 14:33) has entered the sanctuary of the Temple of God, to paraphrase
Pope Paul VI. Prepare to suffer, often -- even especially -- at the hands
of those who also call themselves "Catholic," including those in positions
of authority. Prepare to spend time trying to find a place of worship where
the ancient Mass and all the Sacraments are offered in the traditional way
by a validly ordained priest, and the Faith is presented in its entirety,
something that might require some travel. [For more on traditional Catholicism
as opposed to what is often misunderstood to be Catholicism, see
Traditional Catholicism 101: A Brief
God bless all who read this, and may He lead us to all Truth.
Defense of Catholicism