FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: Vatican to crackdown on alleged Marian Apparitions
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Benedict XVI to crack down on Alleged Apparitions

 http://www.papanews.it

 

Exclusive:

In a “Vademecum” the crackdown by Benedict XVI on Marian apparitions, with a ‘pool’ of theologians, psychiatrists and exorcists at the service of the bishops for exposing false visionaries

VATICAN CITY [January 8, 2009] - Civitavecchia and Medjugorje represent the most recent and sensational cases: places where the alleged visionaries say they have had and continue to have apparitions of the Virgin, even if Our Lady would simply give them absolutely inconsistent messages from a theological and spiritual point of view . The result: the faithful are bewildered because of the display that the Church not only has not yet recognized them as truthful, but will hardly approve them in the future.

As we know, however, the caution of the Church is very great in the matter: there are hundreds of cases of apparitions rejected and branded as false in the past fifty years. Nevertheless, there are those who continue to swear to see Madonna, drawing to their places crowds of desperate faithful, many times in search of a miracle or a grace that, however, does not come. How then, to deal with this phenomenon? How to prevent the spreading of untruthful messages of the Mother of Christ to mankind?

The answers to these and other questions are contained in a ‘directory’ Benedict XVI has made to instruct the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and that will soon be made public and sent to the diocesan bishops of the whole world. With this document, which integrates the Instructions already issued in 1978 by the Vatican, the Pope calls for the greatest severity in the verifications related to the establishment of the truthfulness Marian apparitions.

The bishops, having set up a commission of psychiatrists, psychologists, theologians and educators, should impose silence on the pseudo-visionaries. This will be a first test: history teaches, from Lourdes to Fatima, from Guadalupe in La Salette, that those who really have the gift of being in direct contact with the Madonna, follow the directives of the local Church, even in the face of enormous sufferings. Therefore, one who will not remain silent but causes the news of these alleged apparitions to circulate freely, attracting around themselves the presence of the curious, journalists and the faithful in search of a particular grace will have already given a sign that shows the falseness of their mysticism. Mary herself, in fact, would never validate an act of disobedience against a bishop, even if they were in error.

The second point: the pseudo-visionaries will be visited by psychiatrists and psychologists, possibly either atheists or Catholics, to certify their mental health and to verify whether or not they are suffering from diseases of a hysterical or hallucinatory character or from delusions of leadership.

The third step to do: determine the level of education of the one being proclaimed a ‘mystic’ so as to avoid one who might mislead the church authorities and the faithful after having carefully studied writings on theology and Mariology. In that sense, one who is under investigation by church authorities will be called upon to deliver to the Commission established by the Diocese the informational equipment in his possession, including personal computer, to make it possible to verify whether he has ever done research in the field of apparitions on the Internet, a wealth of information for those wishing to copy or learn the theological meaning of heavenly messages from true visionaries.

In the directory, also, the bishops are asked to determine whether pseudo-visionaries have direct or indirect economic interests in connection with the pilgrimages and in the inevitable sale of religious souvenirs in the places where they say they see the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Then there is the question of respect for orthodoxy: all that is revealed by the apparitions should not result in being contrary either to the Gospel or doctrine of the Church but be in harmony with them. Needless to say, therefore, that if a visionary attributes to the Madonna phrases or concepts contrary to the Magisterium, he or she is to be considered false.

If directly from the analysis nothing abnormal should result, and then the visionary be considered credible, ultimately that visionary will have to be questioned by one or more demonologists and exorcists to exclude the possibility that Satan (as has happened already so many other times in the history of Christianity) is hiding behind the apparitions in order to deceive the faithful.

Under the new instructions ready to be issued by the Holy See on behalf of  Benedict XVI, who already had to deal with the phenomenon of Marian apparitions during his more than twenty-year mandate as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, one can therefore expect a real crackdown with longer, more meticulous and strict processes on the part of the Dioceses, also in order to provide correct information to the faithful, so that no more events will take place like those in Civitavecchia and Medjugorje, where thousands of people continue to come even though the Vatican has never recognized as true and supernatural the  phenomena reported there.

Of course, according to the ‘Vademecum’ which the Pope had written for the competent Congregation, the same investigative practice will be used if someone should claim to see and talk to Jesus, the angels or the saints, or even (a recent case is in the province of Salerno) manifest the stigmata or say they have statues and sacred images that shed tears in the house.

To know the mind of Benedict XVI on the subject, it suffices to remember what he said, while still a Cardinal, to the journalist and author Vittorio Messori:

“In this field, more than ever before, patience is a fundamental element. No apparition is indispensable to the faith, Revelation ended with Jesus Christ.”

The well-known theologian Rene Laurentin, after years of research, has recorded over 2,450 Marian documented events in the history of the Church. But out of almost 300 requests for investigation initiated in the last century, church authorities have officially certified as true only a dozen appearances. The most recent recognition is that of Our Lady of Laus, in France, which took place May 8, 2008, but the faithful had to wait three centuries before obtaining it. The other approved apparitions are mainly concentrated in Europe (Fatima, La Salette, Tuy, Beauraing, Banneux, Syracuse), but also in Egypt (Zeitun), Syria (Damascus) and Rwanda (Kibeho).

At the beginning of this article we mentioned Civitavecchia and Medjugorje; in the first case it is a little girl that claims to have had apparitions of the Virgin. In that context, a statue of Our Lady of Medjugorje placed in the garden of her home would have wept blood; the same phenomenon was supposed to have been repeated in the presence of then Bishop Girolamo Grillo, who was initially skeptical. John Paul II himself, when made aware of what happened, wanted that statue in his private chapel for several hours, but the Vatican has never come out in favor of the apparitions and the tears as being supernatural.

More complex is the case of Medjugorje: for more than a quarter of a century, the Madonna would appear every day to the visionaries, and once a month would speak a message for mankind. .But Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Pope's right-hand man, has never hidden his skepticism? Since 1981, Mary would have appeared tens of thousands of times in Medjugorje. This is a phenomenon that cannot even be compared to other Marian apparitions”. For this reason, the Vatican has asked Opera Romana Pellegrinaggi (one of the most important agencies of religious tourism which belongs to the Vicariate of Rome) to delete from their catalogue visits to the most famous place in Bosnia-Hercegovina, where, nevertheless, more than two million faithful are visiting every year.

Where is the problem? Two factions have been created: one in favor of the apparitions, and therefore on the side of visionaries; the other one openly sided with the diocesan bishop, Msgr. Ratko Peric, who like his late predecessor, does not believe in the truthfulness of these phenomena, and after never having been listened to, already some time ago requested the alleged visionaries to live a hidden life and not disclose any message attributed to the Madonna.

This failure to obey the Bishop would already be enough, according to the ‘Vademecum’ devised by Benedict XVI, to declare the apparitions of Medjugorje to be false.

[Amateur translation from the Italian by Fr. Philip Pavich OFM]

on a side note: This Fr. Pavich was my confessor when I went to Medjugorje in 1998. I wonder what this means,  him being the translator here?  Magdalen


A crackdown on Medjugorje is long over due.
I wonder if these apparitions were truly Our Lady in the beginning, and somewhere along the way - she stopped appearing - and the thing deviated from the truth. Perhaps the seers continued under a farce or a delusion, or perhaps the devil had set up his own counterfeit. It just seems to me that if it was a lie, one of them would have come forward by now and admitted it.
 
Are the messages of Medjugogie published anywhere online? If so, I would like to compare the messages of the earliest days to later days, just to see if/when/where there is a pattern; a moving away from orthodoxy.
 
- Lisa

didishroom Wrote:A crackdown on Medjugorje is long over due.

I couldn't agree more.
StrictCatholicGirl Wrote:I wonder if these apparitions were truly Our Lady in the beginning, and somewhere along the way - she stopped appearing - and the thing deviated from the truth. Perhaps the seers continued under a farce or a delusion, or perhaps the devil had set up his own counterfeit. It just seems to me that if it was a lie, one of them would have come forward by now and admitted it.
 
Are the messages of Medjugogie published anywhere online? If so, I would like to compare the messages of the earliest days to later days, just to see if/when/where there is a pattern; a moving away from orthodoxy.
 
- Lisa

I'd do a websearch, I used to read them regularly before I started scratching my head bald.
Medjugorje and Garabandal need to be laid waste by the hierarchy, and it is high time that something is done about this.

The "seers" at Garabandal said they passed the Infant Jesus around like a toy!

The so-called "seers" at Medjugorje said that "Mary" told them that all religions were equal in her Son's eyes, among several other quotes that are strictly against Catholic teaching. 
Medjugorje has been condemned by its diocese bishop - and Garabandal has been condemned by the FIVE consecutive bishops of its diocese.  Hmmmm...

All other visionaries of TRUE Marian Apparitions have went on to be clergy or other religious, not to live in million dollar homes with tennis courts and swimming pools and driving around Escalades. --- Medjugorje is nothing but a tourist trap and a money pit!

These two false apparitions are proof that Satan is truly taking advantage of the "spirit of Vatican II" and false ecumenism.

Quote: These two false apparitions are proof that Satan is truly taking advantage of the "spirit of Vatican II" and false ecumenism.
 Alright.. I'll play the game. As you are aware, there are people who do not trust the Vatican when it comes to Fatima. They say the third secret has not been revealed in its entirety, that Russia has not been consecrated, and they accused Ratzinger of sweeping the whole Fatima message into oblivion, like it's some sort of embarrassment.  Most of these same folks, however, are hip-hip-hooraying the Vatican for silencing Medjugorgie. But what if the Vatican is trying to do the same thing here? What if it's a conspiracy of silence? Certainly all Marian apparitions - even the real ones - have been downplayed in recent years. - Lisa
didishroom Wrote:A crackdown on Medjugorje is long over due.

+1

At first I thought it was just a non-approved thing, but after investigation I found the most shocking heresy.
Lisa,

Just look up Medjugorje yourself. You don't need the Vatican to tell you it's trash. The 'Seers' are millionaires and live off the tourist's dollars in their mansions. According to them our Lady says that all religions are pleasing to her Son. This is outright blasphemy.  

One of the reasons that the Church has always been very cautious about all apparitions is that the Church teaches that all that we need to know about God, our eternal salvation, and our sanctification, was revealed to us by Christ, and that all Divine Revelation ceased with the death of the Last Apostle.

All that the Church states when it finally approves an apparition is that, after thorough investigation, that it appears that the alleged apparition is not a product of mental illness on the part of the seer, and is not the result of diabolical influence or natural phenomena. However, the faithful are never required to believe in any particular apparition, as all that they (we) are required to believe is the Deposit of Faith that was left to the Church by the Apostles, and the solemn definitions of this by the Church.

I think we need to get back to the basics of what Christ and the Church have always taught, and to quit worrying about whether this or that apparition is authentic. Most of the people I've known that are wrapped up in the various aspects of one apparition or the other really don't know much about their faith, the Bible, or what the Church really teaches, and seem to be looking for some 'new truth'. Guess what? There are no new truths. Nothing is new under the sun.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11