FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: When did Vatican II become dogma?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
In no particular order, a quick google comes up with these and more................

Council of Vienne
http://www.piar.hu/councils/ecum15.htm

“It is an insult to the holy name and a disgrace to the Christian faith that in certain parts of the world subject to Christian princes where Saracens (The followers of Islam) live, sometimes apart, sometimes intermingled with Christians, the Saracen priests, commonly called Zabazala, in their temples or mosques, in which the Saracens meet to adore the infidel Mahomet, loudly invoke and extol his name each day at certain hours from a high place… This brings disrepute on our faith and gives great scandal to the faithful. These practices cannot be tolerated without displeasing the divine majesty. 


ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS X
ON THE DOCTRINES OF THE MODERNISTS

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_x...is_en.html

..........How far off we are here from Catholic teaching we have already seen in the decree of the Vatican Council. We shall see later how, with such theories, added to the other errors already mentioned, the way is opened wide for atheism. Here it is well to note at once that, given this doctrine of experience  united with the other doctrine of symbolism, every religion, even that of paganism, must be held to be true. What is to prevent such experiences from being met within every religion? In fact that they are to be found is asserted by not a few. And with what right will Modernists deny the truth of an experience affirmed by a follower of Islam? With what right can they claim true experiences for Catholics alone? Indeed Modernists do not deny but actually admit, some confusedly, others in the most open manner, that all religions are true. That they cannot feel otherwise is clear. For on what ground, according to their theories, could falsity be predicated of any religion whatsoever?


MORTALIUM ANIMOS
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius11/P11MORTA.HTM

A similar object is aimed at by some, in those matters which concern the New Law promulgated by Christ our Lord. For since they hold it for certain that men destitute of all religious sense are very rarely to be found, they seem to have founded on that belief a hope that the nations, although they differ among themselves in certain religious matters, will without much difficulty come to agree as brethren in professing certain doctrines, which form as it were a common basis of the spiritual life. For which reason conventions, meetings and addresses are frequently arranged by these persons, at which a large number of listeners are present, and at which all without distinction are invited to join in the discussion, both infidels of every kind, and Christians, even those who have unhappily fallen away from Christ or who with obstinacy and pertinacity deny His divine nature and mission. Certainly such attempts can nowise be approved by Catholics, founded as they are on that false opinion which considers all religions to be more or less good and praiseworthy, since they all in different ways manifest and signify that sense which is inborn in us all, and by which we are led to God and to the obedient acknowledgment of His rule. Not only are those who hold this opinion in error and deceived, but also in distorting the idea of true religion they reject it, and little by little. turn aside to naturalism and atheism, as it is called; from which it clearly follows that one who supports those who hold these theories and attempt to realize them, is altogether abandoning the divinely revealed religion.

Scipio_a Wrote:
GodFirst Wrote:
devotedknuckles Wrote:A fasle religion cannot worship the true triune GOD.
Religion, whether false or true, cannot worship at all period for religion is a virtue, and only created persons, human or angel, can love God.
Pedant #2
His statement was so ironically true, don't you think?
Godfirst u r a modernist and a libtard to the highest degree!!!
For u to believe the devil is not involved in the continued outrage to God called protestantism is a modernist ideal. For u continue to defend the evil scurge mohamdanism is a disgrace!!!  I may not be the best typer but I'm a straight shooter when it comes to what counts.
The Holy Faith our faith the only true one!! All others are to use a highbrow term
Full of shit!
Sip sip
(09-26-2009, 11:37 AM)devotedknuckles Wrote: [ -> ]Godfirst u r a modernist and a libtard to the highest degree!!!
For u to believe the devil is not involved in the continued outrage to God called protestantism is a modernist ideal. For u continue to defend the evil scurge mohamdanism is a disgrace!!!  I may not be the best typer but I'm a straight shooter when it comes to what counts.
The Holy Faith our faith the only true one!! All others are to use a highbrow term
Full of shit!
Sip sip

Love it! Sure is nice to hear it like it is! Thanks DK!
Sip sip
(09-26-2009, 11:37 AM)devotedknuckles Wrote: [ -> ]Godfirst u r a modernist and a libtard to the highest degree!!!
For u to believe the devil is not involved in the continued outrage to God called protestantism is a modernist ideal. For u continue to defend the evil scurge mohamdanism is a disgrace!!!  I may not be the best typer but I'm a straight shooter when it comes to what counts.
The Holy Faith our faith the only true one!! All others are to use a highbrow term
Full of shit!
Sip sip
And you, sir, are a sinner. Go and show thyself to the priest for your lies. Can you ever read? I did the exact opposite of all that you claim here. You, sir, better watch out for, as St. Paul infallibly said, "...drunkards....shall [not] possess the kingdom of God", so watch the drinking because it seems to me like you're losing it.

EDIT: I see now: "No, not at all!" was in response to "R u arguing they were right?" not "R u suggesting the devil was not invloved?"
Comming from a modernist libtard ill take that as a compliment!!
Sip sip
(09-26-2009, 01:17 PM)devotedknuckles Wrote: [ -> ]Comming from a modernist libtard ill take that as a compliment!!
Sip sip
You make me laugh.
If you truly take that as a compliment then you're insane.
I maybe insane but I'm no libtard modernist
Sip sip
(09-26-2009, 01:23 PM)devotedknuckles Wrote: [ -> ]I maybe insane but I'm no libtard modernist
Sip sip
I hope we're both neither. Don't let Satan play with you, you're not insane, I was just joking.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13