FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: John Vennari on Global Warming Myth
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
http://www.voiceofcatholicradio.com/

Go to archives and it is in there.

Interesting discussion.  I think he makes the point quite well that the whole environmental thing has an evil design and the Church supporting it is truly diabolical.

Give it 10 or 20 years and I reckon they'll have controls on the number of children you can have.
(11-12-2009, 07:23 PM)ggreg Wrote: [ -> ]http://www.voiceofcatholicradio.com/

Go to archives and it is in there.

Interesting discussion.  I think he makes the point quite well that the whole environmental thing has an evil design and the Church supporting it is truly diabolical.

Give it 10 or 20 years and I reckon they'll have controls on the number of children you can have.

Just though you should know, I clicked the link and got a "virus detected" warning. Is somebody perhaps attacking VOCR?
More likely your anti-virus program was written by a modernist :laughing:
I have been to a couple of the conferences hosted by J Vennari of Catholic Family News (I suscribe to CFN) and they are well worth it. Fr's Kramer, Grunner, and Perez are all 100% traditional, informed, and good holy priests. I would say J V is correct about global warming.
You only have to go and view the global warming forums and read the materials they write to each other and it is pretty clear that involuntary population control either through laws, coercement or high taxes are what they see as a "must" in the future.

Basically none of them believe that humans will voluntarily reduce their "emissions" fast enough, so the only practical option is to reduce the human population to a sustainable number.  The consensus seems to be around 1 billion globally.  Besides the whole environment cause is about more than carbon emissions.  It is also about sustaining fish populations, oil, human waste etc etc etc.

The logic is simple.  Less humans, less of a problem for all aspects of the environment.

They'll start with African first, then India and Indonesia and then they'll be after westerners who have more than 1 or 2 children.  Don't believe it?  Did you believe you'd see homosexuals getting married 20 years ago?
Don't you think that global reduction of population may be  is in God's near future plan? See Akita, Fatima etc...
But not for the same reasons, of course.
The enviornmental groups have been saying that since the beginning, all of the progressive organizations are eugenecists.
tim
One of the reasons I had accused the Pope of being a modernist is because he buys the global warming myth hook, line, and sinker. As well as he is a full supporter of one world government throug the UN. If that ain't modernist, nothing is. But, if I can't excuse his actions, I should at least try to excuse his intentions...hopefully, his intent isn't the promotion of one world government and socialism/communism so I guess I have to give him the benefit of the doubt as well as pray for the Holy Father.

The population almost certainly will go up to 10 billion, than will start to diminish slowly. The rate of the growing already diminished quickly, and not only because of the forced abortions in China. The reason is that outside of the rural communities larger family is obstacle, not benefit, and the rural communities are rapidly shrinking.

That many people could live comfortably with somewhat more justifiable distribution of the goods. This goal probably will require the termination of the Western Culture. Somewhere there is a limit of the abuses, and we reached it.

Do not worry. The Christianity will survive without us, God is triumphant.

(11-13-2009, 01:06 PM)ggreg Wrote: [ -> ]You only have to go and view the global warming forums and read the materials they write to each other and it is pretty clear that involuntary population control either through laws, coercement or high taxes are what they see as a "must" in the future.

Basically none of them believe that humans will voluntarily reduce their "emissions" fast enough, so the only practical option is to reduce the human population to a sustainable number.  The consensus seems to be around 1 billion globally.  Besides the whole environment cause is about more than carbon emissions.  It is also about sustaining fish populations, oil, human waste etc etc etc.

The logic is simple.  Less humans, less of a problem for all aspects of the environment.

They'll start with African first, then India and Indonesia and then they'll be after westerners who have more than 1 or 2 children.  Don't believe it?  Did you believe you'd see homosexuals getting married 20 years ago?
(11-14-2009, 12:16 PM)maso Wrote: [ -> ]Don't you think that global reduction of population may be  is in God's near future plan? See Akita, Fatima etc...
But not for the same reasons, of course.

Perhaps.  But that is God's business.  He is the author of life and death, not Jonathan Bloody Porrit.
Pages: 1 2