FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: The Heretical Kueng Attacks Benedict XVI and calls for New Council
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
After finding hope in his meeting with Pope Benedict at the beginning of his pontificate, Kueng criticizes his former colleague for failing the world by not approving of birth control to control "overpopulation", not passing out condoms to control "AIDS" among other things, and condemns the Pope for issuing the Motu Proprio, Anglicanorum Coetibus (the document inviting Anglicans to join the Catholic Church).

Uncharacteristically, Associated Press, noted that the heretical priest is encouraging Bishops to be disobedient.

After declaring Benedict's "restoration" dead, in his open letter for the Suddeutsche Zeitung, the rebellious cleric issues a feeble rallying call to the Bishops to hold a new council which he wants to correct all of the problems of Church by submitting to the the spirit of the world and instituting changes to the Church he supposes will fulfill the will of the Council Fathers.

There is a war of interpretations going on about the true import of the ambiguous documents of the Second Vatican Council.


http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2010...edict.html
On top of the absolute wrongness of everything he is saying, there's the whole "hitting a man when he's down" thing.  Just despicable.
Don't kid yourselves he with this communique has tickled more than a few ears. The progressives would like to use this "crisis" to advance their agenda.
tim
Küng is dangerous.
Aren't they friends from their years together at Tübingen? Didn't the Holy Father host Küng for dinner some years back?
(04-15-2010, 03:46 PM)Cyriacus Wrote: [ -> ]Aren't they friends from their years together at Tübingen? Didn't the Holy Father host Küng for dinner some years back?

Yes. That is what caused Stephen Hand to become a Traditionalist and leave his neo-con Novus Ordo sensibilities behind. I don't know how you can have dinner with a man who denies the physical resurrection of Christ. A heresy that goes beyond anything Luther ever held. Kung is still a Catholic in good standing. 
(04-15-2010, 05:19 PM)SaintRafael Wrote: [ -> ]Kung is still a Catholic

Is he? Maybe as far as the world is concerned, but a person who denies any dogma of the Catholic Church is not truly Catholic.
(04-15-2010, 05:36 PM)INPEFESS Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-15-2010, 05:19 PM)SaintRafael Wrote: [ -> ]Kung is still a Catholic

Is he? Maybe as far as the world is concerned, but a person who denies any dogma of the Catholic Church is not truly Catholic.

Of coarse he is an apostate and outside of the Church when it comes to the judgement of God, but here on Earth, it "appears" he is Catholic because there is no judicial canonical censure against him. The Church hasn't physically excommunicated him even though he is no longer Catholic. That the Church does not do her job of discipline, making it clear the actual reality of the state of Kung's soul is what leads to confusion for many Catholic.
SOMEONE SHOULD PULL THE PUG ON THIS WHACK JOB.
(04-16-2010, 11:08 AM)JCCMADD Wrote: [ -> ]SOMEONE SHOULD PULL THE PUG ON THIS WHACK JOB.

Wait, what?
Pages: 1 2