11-11-2011, 11:30 PM
I found an interesting post on the Catholic Knight blog.
http://catholicknight.blogspot.com/2011/...ction.html
The highlight of the post:
"The idea here is that a time will come, someday in the not-too-distant future (perhaps in another 8 to 16 years)
when the separation of the two forms will no longer be necessary. A new missal will be released, which will essentially
be Tridentine in nature, but with an expanded lectionary, tightening the rubrics for the Liturgy of the Eucharist in comparison
to today's Novus Ordo, and loosening the rubrics for the Liturgy of the Word in comparison to today's Tridentine mass.
Thus the Liturgy of the Eucharist would be set in stone, thoroughly Tridentine in nature, while the Liturgy of the Word would
have some flexibility. Priests who want to make their celebration as traditional as possible will be able to do so easily, and
exclusively in Latin if they prefer. While priests who want to make their celebration a bit more contemporary will also do so
easily, likely using the vernacular translations. The Liturgy of the Eucharist would remain constant for all priests, regardless
of their persuasion, and the canon of the mass (the consecration itself) will likely be said exclusively in Latin, regardless of
the vernacular translation being used for the rest of the liturgy. This is what the 'Knight' has heard will be the framework of
a future Missal for the Roman Rite."
On another comment page,
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=...Popup=true
if you look at the 10th comment, Catholic Knight mentions Bishop Fellay has direct knowledge of the proposed Ordinary
Form/Extraordinary Form hybrid Mass.
Will this really happen? Or is it more likely either the 1965 Missal or the Anglican Use Liturgy will simply replace the Novus Ordo as
the Ordinary Form, while the Tridentine Mass will remain the Extraordinary Form?
http://catholicknight.blogspot.com/2011/...ction.html
The highlight of the post:
"The idea here is that a time will come, someday in the not-too-distant future (perhaps in another 8 to 16 years)
when the separation of the two forms will no longer be necessary. A new missal will be released, which will essentially
be Tridentine in nature, but with an expanded lectionary, tightening the rubrics for the Liturgy of the Eucharist in comparison
to today's Novus Ordo, and loosening the rubrics for the Liturgy of the Word in comparison to today's Tridentine mass.
Thus the Liturgy of the Eucharist would be set in stone, thoroughly Tridentine in nature, while the Liturgy of the Word would
have some flexibility. Priests who want to make their celebration as traditional as possible will be able to do so easily, and
exclusively in Latin if they prefer. While priests who want to make their celebration a bit more contemporary will also do so
easily, likely using the vernacular translations. The Liturgy of the Eucharist would remain constant for all priests, regardless
of their persuasion, and the canon of the mass (the consecration itself) will likely be said exclusively in Latin, regardless of
the vernacular translation being used for the rest of the liturgy. This is what the 'Knight' has heard will be the framework of
a future Missal for the Roman Rite."
On another comment page,
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=...Popup=true
if you look at the 10th comment, Catholic Knight mentions Bishop Fellay has direct knowledge of the proposed Ordinary
Form/Extraordinary Form hybrid Mass.
Will this really happen? Or is it more likely either the 1965 Missal or the Anglican Use Liturgy will simply replace the Novus Ordo as
the Ordinary Form, while the Tridentine Mass will remain the Extraordinary Form?