FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: Other Sheep Not of Our Flock.
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
I read this article in my diocesan newspaper and thought I'd share it.
I'm not trying to beat a dead horse, but articles like this help us to better recognize, and demonstrate to others, the dire state of crisis the Church is currently in.
Quote: Other Sheep Not Of Our Flock

2012-01-29

I grew up with strong, conservative, Roman Catholic roots: the Baltimore Catechism, the Latin mass, daily rosary, daily mass if possible, and a rich stream of devotional practices. And that's a gift for which I'm deeply grateful.

But that wonderful grounding also brought with it a distrust of all religious things not Roman Catholic. I was taught that the Roman Catholic Church was the only true church and the only road to heaven; so much so that we were strongly discouraged and tacitly forbidden to participate in any Protestant church services. In fairness to that catechesis, we didn't believe that Protestants and other religious communities were doomed to eternal perdition, but we struggled mightily to articulate how this might take place. Among other things, we postulated a place we called Limbo, where sincere, non-Roman Catholics with good souls might spend eternity, happy but without God.

But as T.S. Eliot once wrote, "home is where we start from".  And home is a good place to start from in terms of how we as faith communities, divided from each other, might better understand each other and each church's own particular relationship to Christ.

And often times the impetus for that comes not as much from biblical and theological insights as it does from an ecumenism of life. As we interact with each other we begin to sense that the question of who has access to God and Christ is infinitely more complex than can be captured in any theological formula. In John's Gospel (10, 16), Jesus says: I have other sheep too, that are not of this sheepfold. I must bring them also. They will listen to my voice, and there will be one flock and one shepherd.

I've learned the truth of that statement through personal experience. Within my nearly forty years in ministry I have met, befriended, and become a faith-companion to men and women from every type of denomination and religion: Protestants, Episcopalians, Anglicans, Evangelicals,  Unitarians, small free Churches of all kinds,  Jehovah Witnesses, Hindus, Moslems, and Buddhists. In all of these denominations and religious communities, I have met men and women of deep faith and outstanding charity.

And this has caused me to ask myself the question that Jesus once asked those who approached him and told him that his mother and family were outside the circle he was talking to, asking for him: "Who is my mother? And who are my brethren? And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! For whosoever does the will of my Father which is in heaven, is my brother, and sister, and mother. (Matthew 12:46-50)

We tend to believe that "blood is thicker than water" and so we sometimes defend our own families, ethnic groups, countries, and churches, even when they do wrong things. What Jesus affirms is that "faith is thicker than blood" and, even more deeply, that faith is also thicker than denominational or religious affiliation.

St. Paul agrees: In his Epistle to the Galatians, he asks the question: Who is living inside the Holy Spirit? Who really has genuine faith? His answer: Those whose lives manifest charity, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and chastity. The presence of these virtues manifests faith and Christ. Conversely, he warns that we shouldn't delude ourselves when our lives manifest, among other things, adultery, hatred, factionalism, strife, and envy. Our real brothers and sisters in faith are those whose lives manifest charity rather than selfishness, love rather than hatred, large hearts rather than selective sympathies, gentleness rather than hardness, and kindness rather than mean-spiritedness. Virtue trumps denominational identity.

I will always be a Roman Catholic, just as I will always be a member of my biological family, the Rolheisers, and my religious community, the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate. I've been baptized into these families and baptism, as the old catechisms rightly teach, leaves an indelible mark on our souls. These will always be my families; but they may not be my only loyalty. I have other families too, not of these sheepfolds: non-Roman Catholics, non-Rolheisers, non-Oblates. And I don't love the Roman Catholic Church, my biological family, or the Oblates of Mary Immaculate any less because of this. Paradoxically, I love them more.

When Jesus asks the question: "Who is mother and brother and sister to me?" he answers that whoever does the will of God is his true mother, true brother, and true sister. But, as the Gospels writers have at that point already strongly emphasized, his biological mother, Mary, was the first person who fit that description. Hence, he is not denigrating his mother, but re-establishing her worth and importance at a higher place.

The same should be true for us in our relationship to the faith families into which we have been baptized, even as we open up our hearts more and more to embrace those others who are not of our fold. Faith is thicker than blood - and thicker even than religious affiliation.
Ronald Rolheiser, a Roman Catholic priest and member of the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate, is president of the Oblate School of Theology in San Antonio, Texas.
http://www.ronrolheiser.com/
What rubbish.  Father needs to review the Council of Florence and then practice some true Charity:
11th Session Wrote:The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the "eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels" (Matthew 25:41) unless before death they are joined with Her.
Sad that a priest could write this.

Besides the usual false ideas, there's this mistaken notion that limbo was a sort of "heaven lite for Protestants."
So, here we have another priest "in good standing" with the Church but the SSPX are the schismatic ones who cannot exercise lawful ministry?

Why are some people so blind?
Well, yanno, since baptism isn't necessary for salvation...
grrr
(02-10-2012, 02:30 PM)Vetus Ordo Wrote: [ -> ]So, here we have another priest "in good standing" with the Church but the SSPX are the schismatic ones who cannot exercise lawful ministry?

This is why I strongly want to see the Society regularized.  We need them recognized as Catholic priests so that nobody can deny it.  The Church needs priests who will give sound teaching. We need men who will counteract the sort of teaching shown in the OP.
(02-10-2012, 12:46 PM)Dellery Wrote: [ -> ]Ronald Rolheiser, a Roman Catholic priest and member of the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate, is president of the Oblate School of Theology in San Antonio, Texas.
http://www.ronrolheiser.com/

For some reason it does not surprise me that this priest lead the parish mission at my neighborhood NO parish last lent.
The Church is in the midst of one of the worst crises in her history, and we
have this kind of namby-pamby preaching going on. If not for our Lord's
promise, I would have lost hope a long time ago.  So very depressing.
Sadly, that's all too commonplace now.  I remember passing by a room in which some priest was giving a "retreat" for children who were preparing for confirmation.  I only heard about fifteen seconds of what he was saying because I was just passing by, but I heard something like: "Now have you noticed that I've been speaking for fifteen minutes without mentioning the 'G' word.  And this is because people can't relate their religion well to the world when they can only think of God when they think of their religion.  But religion is so much more than that...."  That's paraphrasing, but it's about what he was saying.
That article is just plain blasphemy.  Do these people, priests or otherwise, just throw out everything the Church has always taught?  It seems to me their interpretation of the Church is that the Church was found in the 1960s.  Depressing...
Pages: 1 2