FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: Romney is pro-abortion
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
Virgil Goode of the Constitution Party is who you want if you are pro life...

http://www.goodeforpresident2012.com/the-issues.html

Abortion: In the United States House of Representatives, I had a consistent pro-life voting record and in 2008 the National Right to Life Political Action Committee commended me "for your 100 percent pro-life voting record throughout your twelve years of service in the U.S. House of Representatives".  As President I would continue to oppose abortion and would submit a budget to Congress with zero funding for planned parenthood and any other similar entities.
I'm voting for Romney. Obama has to go.
In the past we have had "pro life" presidents and yet we still have abortion. So that issue is not really the main thing, esp in this election. Bush did a good thing appointing the 2 conservative justice's, paving the way for a possible overturn in the future, although I dont see that happenning anytime soon. If Obama stays, he likely will appoint 2 liberal justice's, a setback indeed. At least Romney would probably appoint conservative ones. That alone is worth putting him in. Then the court is heavy on the conservative side. If you dont vote and the big O gets in again, ask yourself if things will be better or worse. And no doubt Romney would be better at working on the economy. O will go after the 1st and 2nd ammendments; he has nothing to lose (except his soul, which he probably doesn't even think about) Gotta take Romney here given the choices available.
(08-31-2012, 11:40 AM)In nomine Patris Wrote: [ -> ]In the past we have had "pro life" presidents and yet we still have abortion. So that issue is not really the main thing, esp in this election. Bush did a good thing appointing the 2 conservative justice's, paving the way for a possible overturn in the future, although I dont see that happenning anytime soon. If Obama stays, he likely will appoint 2 liberal justice's, a setback indeed. At least Romney would probably appoint conservative ones. That alone is worth putting him in. Then the court is heavy on the conservative side. If you dont vote and the big O gets in again, ask yourself if things will be better or worse. And no doubt Romney would be better at working on the economy. O will go after the 1st and 2nd ammendments; he has nothing to lose (except his soul, which he probably doesn't even think about) Gotta take Romney here given the choices available.

Yes, Mitt Romney, Conservative from Massachusetts. How will he be better for the economy? You do realize that we are completely upside down in debt. Federal debt is all that is reported. And that makes sense we live in the United States of America. And all the power is at the Fed level. Individual State debt, County, and all kinds of unfunded liabilities make that $16 Trillion look like nothing. Because it is.

What in the First Amendment is of any benefit to us? The homosexuals use it for their "Pride" parades. And the bishops use it for couching their issue as a religious liberty issue rather than calling these activities evil. Are you dumb enough to actually try free speech in any meaningful way?

Freedom in America means license to talk about and engage in immoral sexual activity. Oh, and there has been no stopping of the porn distribution system. Or the sewage you open your home to if you decide to plug in a TV.

But, I fear many top players, who actually will decide, think Romney will be better than Obama. And looking at a few things I have seen on Drudge, it looks like the deciders do want Romney and he has a real chance. Take for instance a photo of Obama's face being eclipsed behind one of his tele prompters. That was a real sign and quite the departure from the halo effect with which they used to shoot him, or may have even photo-shopped in. I have noticed also other cheap shots taken at him for every little mistake he has made. Petty stuff.

So my theory is that Obama has done his work. And they want a white man to bring us into World War III.

Just a feeling I'm getting.

They were showing Romney's speech on Google and Youtube live. I clicked on it for a second. He was talking about how women should do whatever they want and blah, blah, blah. It was all I could take. Also noticed an item on Drudge that Romney's wife was pushing for Condi to be VP. What a joke. I'm assuming you all can read into my criticism of this show and fill in the blanks. 

the next pres will likely appoint 2 more justices. Who would Romney appt; who would Obama appt?
(08-31-2012, 01:22 PM)In nomine Patris Wrote: [ -> ]the next pres will likely appoint 2 more justices. Who would Romney appt; who would Obama appt?

When Bush jr. was President, the Repubs controlled all three branches of government. Any effort at an abortion ban? Didn't think so. They do not give a rip; if they outlaw abortion, they don't have that as a political tool to capitalize on pro-life lulled sheep.
(08-31-2012, 01:36 PM)MRose Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-31-2012, 01:22 PM)In nomine Patris Wrote: [ -> ]the next pres will likely appoint 2 more justices. Who would Romney appt; who would Obama appt?

When Bush jr. was President, the Repubs controlled all three branches of government. Any effort at an abortion ban? Didn't think so. They do not give a rip; if they outlaw abortion, they don't have that as a political tool to capitalize on pro-life lulled sheep.

Exactly. It would be the greatest tragedy ever for the GOP.
Pages: 1 2 3