FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: Sedevacantism Debate at this Forum
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
(01-23-2013, 10:11 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]I say stuff a bit like that, but when I say it, it makes sense.   Smile

So you admit saying, "blah, blah, blah" and further assert that it makes sense?
If this thread cannot be civil, then it is clear how a subforum would be...

Maybe I would suggest a subforum for controversies as a whole. This forum would have topics in it that could be scandalous by their topic, but still, legitimate discussions.

Topics such as the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin, private revelations which are contested (three days of darkness), Sedevacantism, and standards of Catholic conduct (trousers for women) which may be scandalous or represent traditional Catholics in a bad light if they are not seen as essentially private discussions of people within a group would be good for such a forum. It would not be publicly viewable, and it would be moderated strictly and held strictly to logical discourse, respectful rhetoric, and citation of sources. This means that people who could not discuss the topic without using logical fallacies, personal abuse, and who cannot present sources, would be excluded from that forum.

A Sede forum is a bit much, but I can see a use for the sort of forum I just described.
(01-23-2013, 10:12 PM)DrBombay Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:11 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]I say stuff a bit like that, but when I say it, it makes sense.   Smile

So you admit saying, "blah, blah, blah" and further assert that it makes sense?

LOL

You can be quite the wit, good Doctor.  Tip o' the hat
(01-23-2013, 10:12 PM)DrBombay Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:11 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]I say stuff a bit like that, but when I say it, it makes sense.   Smile

So you admit saying, "blah, blah, blah" and further assert that it makes sense?

I said that blah is blah when it is blah.  What could be more sensible and profound?  Everyone should take these words to heart and live by them.
(01-23-2013, 10:26 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:12 PM)DrBombay Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:11 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]I say stuff a bit like that, but when I say it, it makes sense.   Smile

So you admit saying, "blah, blah, blah" and further assert that it makes sense?

I said that blah is blah when it is blah.  What could be more sensible and profound?  Everyone should take these words to heart and live by them.

Obviously you have been infected with Modernist cooties because of blah blah.  Blah, blah, blah
(01-23-2013, 10:34 PM)Parmandur Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:26 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:12 PM)DrBombay Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:11 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]I say stuff a bit like that, but when I say it, it makes sense.   Smile

So you admit saying, "blah, blah, blah" and further assert that it makes sense?

I said that blah is blah when it is blah.  What could be more sensible and profound?  Everyone should take these words to heart and live by them.

Obviously you have been infected with Modernist cooties because of blah blah.  Blah, blah, blah

Such profound debate. It's clearly leading us all closer to God!
I knew there was a reason I voted "no" two days ago.  Eye-roll
(01-23-2013, 10:39 PM)Servus Immaculatae Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:34 PM)Parmandur Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:26 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:12 PM)DrBombay Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:11 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]I say stuff a bit like that, but when I say it, it makes sense.   Smile

So you admit saying, "blah, blah, blah" and further assert that it makes sense?

I said that blah is blah when it is blah.  What could be more sensible and profound?  Everyone should take these words to heart and live by them.

Obviously you have been infected with Modernist cooties because of blah blah.  Blah, blah, blah

Such profound debate. It's clearly leading us all closer to God!
I knew there was a reason I voted "no" two days ago.  Eye-roll

Yeah, this thread makes me regret my "yes" vote.
This thread makes me glad I'm sufficiently anti-democratic not to vote...  Wink
(01-23-2013, 10:34 PM)Parmandur Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:26 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:12 PM)DrBombay Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 10:11 PM)JayneK Wrote: [ -> ]I say stuff a bit like that, but when I say it, it makes sense.   Smile

So you admit saying, "blah, blah, blah" and further assert that it makes sense?

I said that blah is blah when it is blah.  What could be more sensible and profound?  Everyone should take these words to heart and live by them.


Obviously you have been infected with Modernist cooties because of blah blah.  Blah, blah, blah



(01-23-2013, 09:07 PM)Parmandur Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-23-2013, 09:05 PM)TrentCath Wrote: [ -> ]Jayne, in more than a few posts, has posted this. 'Oh every council needs time, maybe in a hundred years it'll be sorted' to paraphrase her words.

Paraphrase is a dangerous tool.  What were her exact words, and where?

Yes, Jayne did say this recently, in response to one of my posts, so I can find it for you.  As for my points earlier, I exaggerated a little ("infinitely more"), but I have heard others say that we're not qualified to compare Magisterial documents and that, like Protestants, we're engaging in private interpretation (if I'm not mistaken, it was a discussion between Jayne and INP, but I've got to look through 497 pages of her posts to find it, assuming it took place within the last year).

Here it is: http://catholicforum.fisheaters.com/inde...sg33853051

JayneK Wrote:As I understand it, it is typical for there to be a period of confusion after a Council as its teachings become assimilated.  The historical pattern is that one should allow at least a hundred years for this.  I have seen enough progress in the last 50 years that I have no trouble believing that we are moving through the process and will arrive at more clarity in the future.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35