FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: Low Church Evangelical Youths Moving Toward High Church
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

From "The Christian Pundit" blog. See original article at the blog itself for links contained in the article:

Young Evangelicals Are Getting High

A friend of mine attended a Christian college where almost all of the students, including her, grew up in non-denominational, evangelical Protestant churches. A few years after graduation, she is the only person in her graduating class who is not Roman Catholic,  high Anglican or Lutheran. The town I live in has several “evangelical” Protestant colleges: on Ash Wednesday you can tell who studies at them by the ash crosses on their foreheads.

Young Christians are going over to Catholicism and high Anglicanism/Lutheranism in droves, despite growing up in low Protestant churches that told them about Jesus. It’s a trend that is growing, and it looks like it might go that way for a while: people who grew up in stereotypical, casual evangelicalism are running back past their parents’ church to something that looks like it was dug out of Europe a couple hundred years ago at least. It’s encouraged by certain emergent leaders and by other “Christian” authors whose writings promote “high” theology under a Protestant publisher’s cover.

Ten or fifteen years ago, it was American evangelical congregations that seemed cutting edge. They had the bands, the coolest youth pastor, professional babysitting for every women’s Bible study, and a church library full of Christian novels. But now, to kids who grew up in that context, it seems a bit dated or disconnected—the same kind of feeling that a 90′s movie gives them. Not that it’s not a church; it’s just feels to them the way that 50′s worship felt to their parents. So they leave. If they don’t walk away from Christianity completely, they head to Rome or something similar.

In a way, it’s hard to understand. Why would you trade your jeans, fair-trade coffee, a Bible and some Getty songs for formal “church clothes”, fasting, a Bible and a priest? It makes no sense to want to kneel on a stone floor instead of sit in a comfy chair. And if you’re hearing about Jesus anyway, why does it really matter?

In another way, it’s very obvious why these kids are leaving and going where they are. In her recent article, “Change Wisely, Dude”, Andrea Palpant Dilley explains her own shift from Presbyterianism to apostacy to generic evangelicalism to high church: “In my 20s, liturgy seemed rote, but now in my 30s, it reminds me that I’m part of an institution much larger and older than myself. As the poet Czeslaw Milosz said, ‘The sacred exists and is stronger than all our rebellions.’ Both my doubt and my faith, and even my ongoing frustrations with the church itself, are part of a tradition that started before I was born and will continue after I die. I rest in the assurance that I have something to lean against, something to resist and, more importantly, something that resists me.”

The kids who leave evangelical Protestantism are looking for something the world can’t give them. [html]The world can give them hotter jeans, better coffee, bands, speakers, and book clubs than a congregation can. What it can’t give them is theology; membership in a group that transcends time, place and race; a historic rootedness; something greater than themselves; ordained men who will be spiritual leaders and not merely listeners and buddies and story-tellers. What the kids leaving generic evangelicalism seem to want is something the world can never give them–a holy Father who demands reverence, a Saviour who requires careful worship, and a Spirit who must be obeyed. They are looking for true, deep, intellectually robust spirituality in their parents’ churches and not finding it.[/html]

But not all kids who grew up in American evangelicalism are jumping off into high church rite and sacrament: congregations that carefully teach robust, historic Protestant theology to their children are notably not losing them to the Vatican, or even Lambeth. Protestant churches that recognize their own ecclesiastical and theological heritage, training their children to value and continue it in a 21st century setting, usually retain their youth. These kids have the tools they need to think biblically through the deep and difficult issues of the day and articulate their position without having a crisis of faith. They know the headlines, church history, theology and their Bibles, and so are equipped to engage culture in a winsome, accessible way. They have a relationship with God that is not based on their feelings or commitments but on the enduring promises of the Word and so they can ride out the trends of the American church, knowing that they will pass regardless of mass defections to Rome. That’s not to say that the Book of Common Prayer is unbiblical in its entirety–far from it! It is to say that children raised in spiritually substantive and faithful homes usually find things like holy water, pilgrimages, popes and ash on their faces an affront to the means for spiritual growth that God has appointed in His Word.

Vox Wrote:In other words, it seems that the religious young who receive logical, sane teachings that can be backed up with Scripture and History, who get meat and potatoes rather than feel-goody, felt banner nonsense, stay put. This is what the non-trad Catholics have to come to understand:  their Kum-bah-yah party is over. Way over. This isn't to undermine in the least the importance of fellowship, warmth, serving the community, informal Bible studies, socializing, fun, etc. -- all of which I consider very important! -- but these are things that need to come outside of and after the liturgy. That's what parish basements -- not naves -- are for.

“He cannot have God as his Father who does not have the church for his Mother,” said Cyprian, nearly two millennia ago. Perhaps if Protestant churches began acting more like dutiful mothers instead of fun babysitters, there would be fewer youth leaving their ecclesiastical homes as soon as they are out of the house.

Vox Wrote:Sounds like the time is ripe to reach out to young Evangelicals and teach them Scripture according to the Fathers, Church History, History in general, and Catholic theology -- and to do so with prudence, charity, empathy, and while acting as an example of someone who has the peace and joy of Christ.
Praised be Jesus Christ, now and forever!

Thank you for posting this. I happen to have followed a similar path. As a child, I was brought to various Baptist congregations. Eventually, the non-denominational fad lured a large part of my family into that happy-go-lucky feel-good sort of sing-along "worship" service, where people would be invited to come to the front and be "saved" after accepting Jesus as personal lord and savior. When high-school came around, there wasn't anything obligatory or substantial about that sort of Christianity, so I stopped going. That presto-conversion seemed to be all you would need for salvation, and once you were "saved," you literally could not be "unsaved," so it didn't really matter if you missed church for a week, or a month, or, well, you get the idea. I still considered myself Christian, but admittedly confused. To make a long story short, the conversion of this sinner to the Catholic Faith went like this:

1) Stop attending church in 9th grade.
2) Start dating first and only girlfriend.
3) Dine with said girlfriend and her catholic family.
4) Witness their Faith and desire it.
5) Begin joining them in their pre and post dinner prayers.
6) At year 4 of the relationship, inform father of desire to become catholic.
7) At year 6, ask for girlfriend to marry me.
8) At year 8, baptized in Roman Catholic church.
9) Break up with fiancé to discern vocation to the Priesthood and/or religious life.
10) Still discerning.

Thank you, Vox, for this wonderful website.
Just as the sunflowers turn toward the sun so the those who want to follow Christ will turn toward the Catholic Church
Smile Smile Smile
Interesting that the author quotes St Cyprian who, of course, was talking specifically the Catholic Church and not the heretical conventicles which were the protestants and evangelicals of the dy. Smile