FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

(08-15-2013, 07:30 PM)lumine Wrote: [ -> ]Showing my ignorance here...under Conservative Catholic:  RNC ? 

republican national committee.

being a republican is part and parcel of being a neocon catholic in the united states.

(08-15-2013, 07:34 PM)guacamole Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-15-2013, 07:30 PM)lumine Wrote: [ -> ]Showing my ignorance here...under Conservative Catholic:  RNC ? 

republican national committee.

being a republican is part and parcel of being a neocon catholic in the united states.

No thank you....Republican, boooooo.......see what I mean about the chart?

Well, you're in-between.  (What are your political views, by the way?)

However, keep in mind that these taxonomies never capture reality perfectly.  We're talking about human beings.  But that doesn't make them useless.

Sedevacantists should be added to Radical traditionalists I think. Otherwise, Trad and Rad trad are too similar.

(08-15-2013, 07:51 PM)guacamole Wrote: [ -> ]Well, you're in-between.  (What are your political views, by the way?)

However, keep in mind that these taxonomies never capture reality perfectly.  We're talking about human beings.  But that doesn't make them useless.

Political views: mainly Democrat.

And another thing, Saint Athanasius is one of my favorite saints, however I would not compare his time in Church history to ours at all.  The Church has always had crises.  You have a good point about the chart, it's a starting place.

(08-15-2013, 06:59 PM)lumine Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think there are ambiguities in the Vatican II Documents.  They are written in a way that promotes higher level thinking (remember that phrase from your college days, anyone?)

Reminds me of the 'Higher Criticism' by which the prots and rationalists attempted to destroy the Faith.

(08-15-2013, 08:22 PM)jovan66102 Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-15-2013, 06:59 PM)lumine Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think there are ambiguities in the Vatican II Documents.  They are written in a way that promotes higher level thinking (remember that phrase from your college days, anyone?)

Reminds me of the 'Higher Criticism' by which the prots and rationalists attempted to destroy the Faith.

Here you go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom's_Taxonomy

And:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higher-order_thinking

(08-15-2013, 08:32 PM)lumine Wrote: [ -> ]Here you go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom's_Taxonomy

Oh, I knew what you were talking about. Of course, I buy very little of what comes out of the 'educational establishment' since John Dewey corrupted it in the early part of the XXth century. I consider Dewey, Marx and Freud the three great modern destroyers of civilisation.

(08-15-2013, 08:37 PM)jovan66102 Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-15-2013, 08:32 PM)lumine Wrote: [ -> ]Here you go:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloom's_Taxonomy

Oh, I knew what you were talking about. Of course, I buy very little of what comes out of the 'educational establishment' since John Dewey corrupted it in the early part of the XXth century. I consider Dewey, Marx and Freud the three great modern destroyers of civilisation.

I added a second link.

So I am a Traditionalist after all!  :LOL: