FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: Vatican Asks For Parish Level Input on Marriage and Contraception
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
http://ncronline.org/news/vatican/vatica...d-document

NATIONAL CATHOLIC REPORTER
Joshua J. McElwee 
Oct. 31, 2013
WASHINGTON

The Vatican has asked national bishops' conferences around the world to conduct a wide-ranging poll of Catholics asking for their opinions on church teachings on contraception, same-sex marriage and divorce.
Archbishop Lorenzo Baldisseri, secretary general of the Vatican's Synod of Bishops, asked the conferences to distribute the poll "immediately as widely as possible to deaneries and parishes so that input from local sources can be received."

The poll, which comes in a questionnaire sent to national bishops' conferences globally in preparation for a Vatican synod on the family next October, is the first time the church's central hierarchy has asked for such input from grass-roots Catholics since at least the establishment of the synod system following the Second Vatican Council.

The upcoming synod, which Pope Francis announced earlier this month, is to be held Oct. 5-19, 2014, on the theme "Pastoral Challenges of the family in the context of evangelization."

The questionnaire was sent Oct. 18 from Baldisseri to the presidents of the world's individual bishops' conferences.


It asks the conferences to quiz their populations on topics that sometimes have sharply divided the U.S. church, like the Catholic teaching prohibiting the use of artificial contraception, the possibility of a divorced Catholic to remarry or receive Communion, and the number of young people choosing to live together before marrying.

NCR obtained a copy of the letter and questionnaire.

While Baldisseri asks in his letter for wide consultation on the questions, an accompanying letter sent with the U.S. version of the Vatican document does not request the American bishops undertake wide consultation in their dioceses.

That accompanying letter, dated Oct. 30, is sent from Msgr. Ronny Jenkins, the general secretary of the U.S. bishops' conference, and only asks the U.S. bishops to provide their own observations.

"In his correspondence, Archbishop Baldisseri requests the observations of the members of the Conference regarding the attached preparatory documents and questionnaire that will provide a basis for the preparation ... for the extraordinary synod," Jenkins writes.

Helen Osman, the secretary of communications for the U.S. bishops' conference, said Thursday that Jenkins was out of the office for the day and was not available to comment on how the U.S. bishops might pursue consultation for answering the questions.

In an email after initial publication of this story, Osman said the bishops will follow a “usual process” for soliciting information as “Rome asks for this kind of consultation on a regular basis.”

“We [the conference] pass on to bishops what is sent to us,” wrote Osman. “They then take care of the local consultation and send the data back to us. We transmit it to the Holy See. That is why the letter says the bishops will send back observations (gathered locally).”

“It will be up to each bishop to determine what would be the most useful way of gathering information to provide to Rome,” she wrote.

Among topics bishops' conferences are asked in the Vatican document to question their Catholic populations about:

How the church's teaching on "the value of the family" is understood today. "In those cases where the Church's teaching is known, is it accepted fully or are there difficulties in putting it into practice?" the document asks. "If so, what are they?"
Whether cohabitation, the problem of divorce and remarriage, and same-sex marriages are a "pastoral reality" in their church. "Does a ministry exist to attend to these cases?" the document asks. "How is God's mercy proclaimed to separated couples and those divorced and remarried and how does the Church put into practice her support for them in their journey of faith?"
How persons in same-sex marriages are treated and how children they may adopt are cared for. "What pastoral attention can be given to people who have chosen to live these types of union?" it asks. "In the case of unions of persons of the same sex who have adopted children, what can be done pastorally in light of transmitting the faith?"
Whether married couples have "openness" to becoming parents and whether they accept Humanae Vitae, an encyclical written by Pope Paul VI that prohibited artificial contraception use by Catholics. "Is this moral teaching accepted?" it asks. "What aspects pose the most difficulties in a large majority of couple's accepting this teaching?"
In contrast to the Americans, the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales has set up an online survey that Catholics in their countries can use to respond to the Vatican questions.

Baldisseri asks in his letter that the conferences respond to the questions by the end of January.

Baldisseri also states that Pope Francis wants the October 2014 synod to only be the first step in evaluating these questions and that he intends to address the questions again during a planned synod in 2015 marking the 50th anniversary of the synod's establishment.

The October meeting, the accompanying preparatory document states, will "define the 'status quaestionis' " while the 2015 synod will "seek working guidelines in the pastoral care of the person and the family."

"Concerns which were unheard of until a few years ago have arisen today as a result of different situations, from the widespread practice of cohabitation, which does not lead to marriage … to same-sex unions between persons," the preparatory document states.

Other issues specifically identified in the document as "requiring the Church's attention and pastoral care" include:

Mixed or interreligious marriages;
Single-parent families;
Polygamy;
"A culture of non-commitment and a presumption that the marriage bond can be temporary"; and
"Forms of feminism hostile to the Church"
"A reflection on these issues by the Synod of Bishops, in addition to it being much needed and urgent, is a dutiful expression of charity towards those entrusted to the Bishops' care and the entire human family," the document states.
Cue Fr. Z posting on about how OMG THERE IS A POLLEVERYONE GO VOTE NOW
Edited because there was nothing to suggest the Pope, Father Z, the Church Bishops of any country did anything wrong here.

I apologize for any sins of Gossip, Detraction, Calumny, and/or Slander caused by this post, as well as any other sins committed such as scandal , and any sins others fell or might fall into by reading it as a result.

Glory be to the Father, and to the Son,
and to the Holy Spirit,
as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be,
world without end. Amen.
Surely I am not the only one who sees this to be quite disturbing? First we read that the Gang of Eight are planning major revisions in the governance of The Church, and now we find out that polling data may be used to set policy. Starting to sound more democratic all the time. And look how well that works for the U.S.
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2013/10...-hype.html

Now, the exact same thing is being asked for the Extraordinary Synod convoked by Pope Francis for 2014 on the Family. Since it is a shorter process, the procedure has been summarized, but the intent is the same: to present questions prepared by the Synod Secretariat to the Conferences of Bishops for local discussion. The questions were posted here by NCR, delivered to them by one of their USCCB contacts. In the procedure used for this Extraordinary Synod, the answers will then provide a basis for the lineamenta, but it makes no difference - in the 2012 regular synod, the order was the same: questions formatted by the Synod Secretariat, to be discussed on a local level, and presented as input to the Synod. The only difference now is that the lineamenta will be presented much closer to the Synod's date, which is to be expected considering the 2014 Synod's Extraordinary and rushed nature. The very complex and verbose nature of the current questions make it clear that they are not meant for individual debate by Catholics, but presented for input by local-level bureaucratic structures.

That was not enough to prevent the current set of questions from already being portrayed by religion reporters on Twitter - led astray by the usual liberal Catholic sycophants - as an "unprecedented" "poll" on "controversial questions". We are not a democracy yet, but this "level of discussion" is "incredible".

The media, especially in the Anglosphere, must become more discerning when reporting on this pontificate. There is no need for the malicious anti-Catholic stridency of the Ratzinger years, but the current level of naïveté is ridiculous, and a disservice to readers, Catholic or non-Catholic. Time to find a middle ground anchored in truth.
Edited because there was nothing to suggest the Bishops of any country did anything wrong here that doesn't fall into the realm of speculation.

I apologize for any sins of Gossip, Detraction, Calumny, and/or Slander caused by this post, as well as any other sins committed such as scandal , and any sins others fell or might fall into by reading it as a result.

Glory be to the Father, and to the Son,
and to the Holy Spirit,
as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be,
world without end. Amen.
(11-01-2013, 01:00 PM)Drover Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-01-2013, 12:50 PM)McNider Wrote: [ -> ]http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2013/10...-hype.html

The media, especially in the Anglosphere, must become more discerning when reporting on this pontificate. There is no need for the malicious anti-Catholic stridency of the Ratzinger years, but the current level of naïveté is ridiculous, and a disservice to readers, Catholic or non-Catholic. Time to find a middle ground anchored in truth.

Rorate's article is good, but it looks like some Bishops Conferences are letting laity post responses. That is what has NCR in a tizzy because the USCCB isn't doing that.

The worrying use of this is that some Bishops and Cardinals may be led astray by what the laity say in these matters.

McNider, while I agree in general with what your saying concerning the questionnaire, in the reporting of it I am not so apt to believe this is just on the press.  The truth will not be found amongst the press, secular or catholic, or anywhere at all, in any middle ground.  The harsh anti-catholic press of the secular world against Benedict's papacy  was a result of the message from Pope Benedict being closer to "the truth" than it has been in decades.  The truth is  a tough message to swallow; it was for Pilate in his time, it is for the catholic in the pew today.
Since it's widely known that a majority of Catholics accept and even support the sexual immoralities of this day
and age, I see this only as a way to justify the Pope's already stated intentions (on multiple occasions) to begin
allowing and accepting and supporting various sexual immoralities in the Church.
Maybe only people who can name the 7 Sacraments should have their votes count  Eye-roll
Kind of like asking the fox if he should be allowed access to the henhouse.... LOL
Pages: 1 2