FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: The Prophecies of Blessed Elizabeth Canori Mora
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
What's interesting about this prophecy is it includes a miraculous apparition of St. Peter, like in Bl. Anna Maria Taigi's prophecy. St. Peter will collect all the remaining Catholics of the earth, and they will choose the new pope.
We do know that Revelation ended with John the Evangelist?

And that visions are not canonized even if the visionary is.
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]We do know that Revelation ended with John the Evangelist?
Public revelation, yes
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]And that visions are not canonized even if the visionary is.
Yes, but it shows that there are saintly souls who believe, like some sedevacantists today, that the miraculous election of a pope is possible.
(03-04-2014, 10:32 PM)Geremia Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]We do know that Revelation ended with John the Evangelist?
Public revelation, yes
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]And that visions are not canonized even if the visionary is.
Yes, but it shows that there are saintly souls who believe, like some sedevacantists today, that the miraculous election of a pope is possible.

And, that like sede vacantists, even saintly souls can be mistaken.
(03-04-2014, 11:21 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 10:32 PM)Geremia Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]We do know that Revelation ended with John the Evangelist?
Public revelation, yes
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]And that visions are not canonized even if the visionary is.
Yes, but it shows that there are saintly souls who believe, like some sedevacantists today, that the miraculous election of a pope is possible.

And, that like sede vacantists, even saintly souls can be mistaken.
Yes, but saintly souls are certainly to be trusted more than ourselves.
(03-04-2014, 11:48 PM)Geremia Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 11:21 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 10:32 PM)Geremia Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]We do know that Revelation ended with John the Evangelist?
Public revelation, yes
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]And that visions are not canonized even if the visionary is.
Yes, but it shows that there are saintly souls who believe, like some sedevacantists today, that the miraculous election of a pope is possible.

And, that like sede vacantists, even saintly souls can be mistaken.
Yes, but saintly souls are certainly to be trusted more than ourselves.

Trusted more than Church teaching?

Jesus never promised that we would have sin free, or even intelligent Popes, when he gave Peter the Keys to the Kingdom.
(03-04-2014, 11:48 PM)Geremia Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 11:21 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 10:32 PM)Geremia Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]We do know that Revelation ended with John the Evangelist?
Public revelation, yes
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]And that visions are not canonized even if the visionary is.
Yes, but it shows that there are saintly souls who believe, like some sedevacantists today, that the miraculous election of a pope is possible.

And, that like sede vacantists, even saintly souls can be mistaken.
Yes, but saintly souls are certainly to be trusted more than ourselves.
Would those saintly souls include Padre Pio, who acknowledged Pope Paul VI as pope in, not one, but two letters, the contents of which are available to this very day?

How about Sister Lucia dos Santos, who acknowledged Pope Paul VI as the pope and even attended his Mass during the pope's 1967 trip to Fatima?  Not to mention her acknowledgment of Pope John Paul II as pope.

Should we trust their judgment on the question of who is a legitimate pope, more than our own?  Do sedevacantists trust the judgment of those two saintly souls on the matter? 
(03-04-2014, 11:55 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 11:48 PM)Geremia Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 11:21 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 10:32 PM)Geremia Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]We do know that Revelation ended with John the Evangelist?
Public revelation, yes
(03-04-2014, 09:35 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]And that visions are not canonized even if the visionary is.
Yes, but it shows that there are saintly souls who believe, like some sedevacantists today, that the miraculous election of a pope is possible.

And, that like sede vacantists, even saintly souls can be mistaken.
Yes, but saintly souls are certainly to be trusted more than ourselves.

Trusted more than Church teaching?
No, we are not Church teaching…
(03-04-2014, 11:55 PM)triumphguy Wrote: [ -> ]Jesus never promised that we would have sin free, or even intelligent Popes, when he gave Peter the Keys to the Kingdom.
But Catholics must not a priori dismiss private revelations that do not contradict Church teaching.
(03-05-2014, 12:05 AM)DJR Wrote: [ -> ]Would those saintly souls include Padre Pio, who acknowledged Pope Paul VI as pope in, not one, but two letters, the contents of which are available to this very day?

How about Sister Lucia dos Santos, who acknowledged Pope Paul VI as the pope and even attended his Mass during the pope's 1967 trip to Fatima?  Not to mention her acknowledgment of Pope John Paul II as pope.

Should we trust their judgment on the question of who is a legitimate pope, more than our own?  Do sedevacantists trust the judgment of those two saintly souls on the matter? 
Obviously not
Pages: 1 2