FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: On Church Architecture: Preaching Hall or Temple?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Excerpts from another pretty good article by Fr. Dwight Longenecker, whose latest book is titled “The Romance of Religion.”
I am going to order it!


On Church Architecture: Preaching Hall or Temple?

Architects will quibble about the “form follows function” dictum, but assuming that there is at least some truth to it, we can then ask, “What is a church for?” If we are being merely practical about it, a church is for people to gather for divine worship. Therefore the seating should be comfortable. Everyone should be able to see the altar and the pulpit. There should be a good sound system and adequate amenities like air conditioning, heating and toilets and cry rooms and bride rooms.

The Catholic tradition offers something greater. When we ask what a Catholic Church is for the answer is more than simply an auditorium. Within the Catholic tradition the Church building has more than a practical function. Therefore if “form follows function” we have to ask what these other functions might be for  a Catholic church.

A Catholic Church is first and foremost God’s house. It is where the Divine Presence resides. It is not primarily where we come to meet one another. It is where we all come to meet God. God is here and we come here to worship him. The fellowship we share and the community we build is part of our greater life together that flows from our worship of God in God’s house.

If the Catholic Church is God’s house, then it should be worthy of the Divine Presence. It should speak to us of the dwelling place of God on earth and point us to the dwelling place of God in heaven. In fact, it should be a place called “Bethel”. This is the place where Jacob saw the ladder into heaven with the angels going up and down. He cried out, “This is the very threshold of heaven and the doorstep of God!” In other words, a church should be so beautiful that it points our hearts and minds not only to the presence of God here, but to Holy of Holies in Heaven.

Furthermore, the church should speak of the qualities of the One who dwells there. So the Catholic Church should be beautiful. How do we make it beautiful? We can make it beautiful by putting pretty things in it, but this is only ornamentation. For a church to be truly beautiful it needs not just pretty things in it; it has to be beautiful from the depth of its design. The beauty can’t be just skin deep. It has to be integral to the building as a whole. It has to be beautiful from the ground up and has to be designed from the beginning as a beautiful building.

How does one ensure that a building is beautiful at this deep level? This is not an easy question to answer, but the classical answer is that the dimensions and proportions of beauty were established by the architects of the classical world, and these beautiful proportions have come down to us through 2000 years of Christian tradition in architecture. Therefore, when the church is designed these classical proportions should be incorporated so that the essential design of the building at its very heart will be, in itself, beautiful. When we experience these classical proportions we feel the beauty of the design at a deep level in our souls.

Another function of this temple of God is that it should inspire feelings of wonder and awe. There should be a sense of spaciousness and grandeur–even in a small church–which lifts the heart and mind to heaven. These feelings of wonder and awe open the heart to the beauty which lies at the heart of the church, and at the very heart of God. These feelings prepare the soul for worship and help to bring the soul into the presence of God who dwells in this temple.

[i]Another function of the Catholic Church is that it instructs. It is a sermon in stone[/i]. It tells everyone who sees it, from the inside to the outside, certain truths about the Catholic faith–that the Catholic faith is beautiful and permanent and strong. That the Catholic faith has inner integrity and honesty and truth. All these things are deep, down impressions that register profoundly within the human heart and mind. The decoration of the church will also seek to instruct. We do not install stained glass and mosaics and wall paintings and carvings just to make it look pretty. All of these things reflect the beauty of God and the eloquent beauty of our Catholic faith.

How do we build a traditional church, therefore, in the modern age? We follow the classical proportions when designing the church, and we try to establish an honest relationship between methods and materials.  Finally, we do this with materials that are contemporary to our place and time, and are therefore affordable and simple and strong. When we do all these things together we should therefore produce a church which fulfills all the functions that we expect from a Catholic Church–not just the practical functions of sound system, seating, toilets and storage. Instead we will also fulfill the function stated by the unknown architect of Glastonbury Abbey in England in the Middle Ages, who said, “I want to build a church so beautiful that even the hardest heart will be inspired to pray.”

http://catholicexchange.com/preaching-hall-temple

Fr Dwight Longenecker’s latest book is The Romance of Religion–Fighting for Goodness, Truth and Beauty. Visit his blog, browse his books and be in touch at dwightlongenecker.com
Comfortable seating and sound systems are modernist novelties which have no place in a Catholic church.
(07-08-2014, 04:20 PM)frater Wrote: [ -> ]Comfortable seating and sound systems are modernist novelties which have no place in a Catholic church.

Well, I guess bathrooms would be a modernist novelty too, but, geeee.............
Here in Glasgow, the metropolitan Cathedral, a modest but pretty Victorian neo-Gothic church, has had it high altar and reredos ripped out and replaced by three chairs, one of which is the bishop's (humble types these Vatican II prelates, aren't they).

Mind you, they're only following Church law.

The tabernacle has been moved to a side altar, under a hideous painting of Saint John Ogilve. 

Our Lady's alter has been replaced by two brass doors.

The place feels like a concert hall, or the lobby of a grand municipal building: the floor has been replaced with these squeaky shopping centre style tiles, the walls have been whitewashed and adorned with gaudy gold and multicoloured floral patterns.

The old stone columns have been  covered in plaster-shells (or fibreglass) which have been painted to look stone, it looks so cheap and tacky.

The columns have wide screen television mounted on them.

All the holy water stoops have been removed. They have been replaced by a large baptismal font, in the middle of the nave. It smells of bleach, because the water has been treated, because it is also a fountain. The smell resembles a swimming pool, and the font itself is like something you'd buy in a garden centre.

The original doors from the narthex to the nave have been replaced with glass doors, and these have the bishops coat of arms frosted on to them.

It's hideous. It's free-masonic. It's desacralised. It's secular. It's Protestant. It's a nightmare.

They spent 4 million GBP on it.

It makes me sick. I feel sick when I go in there, which I don't any-more, and I won't.

Oh, and the altar rails have been ripped out, obviously. And the new altar is like a butchers block.

What's so sad, is that in Britain there are a large number of architectural antiquities, especially of this style and era, and so there are many specialists who could have restored this church sympathetically. For half the money. 


Just a reminder:  if you buy anything (anything -- books, DVDs, electronics, games, whatever) from Amazon, go through FE to do it and I get a commission.

To get Father's book, use this link:  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0...lfboutique

(07-08-2014, 02:39 PM)SCG Wrote: [ -> ]If the Catholic Church is God’s house, then it should be worthy of the Divine Presence. It should speak to us of the dwelling place of God on earth and point us to the dwelling place of God in heaven. In fact, it should be a place called “Bethel”. This is the place where Jacob saw the ladder into heaven with the angels going up and down. He cried out, “This is the very threshold of heaven and the doorstep of God!” In other words, a church should be so beautiful that it points our hearts and minds not only to the presence of God here, but to Holy of Holies in Heaven.

Strictly speaking, nothing we could possibly build would be worthy of God. That said, I wholeheartedly agree with your post. The way I think of it is, it's like a child who has received an arts and crafts set as a gift from its father clumsily making something to give back to the father out of love. The father appreciates it because the child did its best, even though the work would be terrible if done by the father himself.

(07-08-2014, 08:31 PM)Miles Immaculatae Wrote: [ -> ]Here in Glasgow, the metropolitan Cathedral, a modest but pretty Victorian neo-Gothic church, has had it high altar and reredos ripped out and replaced by three chairs, one of which is the bishop's (humble types these Vatican II prelates, aren't they).

...

What's so sad, is that in Britain there are a large number of architectural antiquities, especially of this style and era, and so there are many specialists who could have restored this church sympathetically. For half the money. 

I am sad now.
I always felt that the Metropolitan Cathedral should always be the most decked out, a true temple in the style of Solomon.  As it is the heart of the Diocese, a centre of pilgrimage and devotion.  Oratories and parishes should be much more modest in comparison, but you can have modest but beautiful.  Frankly, I find it disturbing the cost of some Churches like the Rog Mahal in LA.  If you are going to spend that kind of money, you might as well make it actually nice, traditional.  But I understand that the committee who designs Churches, particularly in the US, based their philosophy on an 18th century Lutheran who had a penchant for Puritan era town halls as models for Church design.