FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: Europe, Islamophobia, Immigration, and "They"
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Ervin Kohn, whom you can read about in the Times of Israel and the Jewish Telegraph Agency tells us all about how Norway is just too danged white and how Norwegians are racist. They're apparently racist even though they don't act racist or talk racist and would practically die if they were called racist, "racist" being the worst thing a person could be called.




Mr. Kohn: "The Norwegian society is an ethnic homogenous society.
They, um, huge majority of the population, and the Norwegian society
has a very short history with ethnic minorities, um, at a scale.
So, um, um, there is a job to be done."

"Islamophobia"  is apparently a major problem in Norway, according to this guy. There's "a job to be done" 'cause, of course, Muslims will be imported into that country even though no one but a handful of elites wants them there. And if a Norwegian were to hate the idea of Muslims taking over the country, he's a "racist." (I wonder how Mr. Kohn feels about "Islamophobia" in Israel with regard to Palestinians or Iranians. I also wonder whether he'd be OK with moving a bunch of Muslims into Israel.) (Actually I don't wonder about either of those things. I know the answers. What's good for Israel is too good for Christendom, of course.)

And meanwhile, in Sweden, according to The Sweden Report, my emphasis in bold:


Swedish police: 55 official no-go zones
October 29, 2014
The Sweden Report


The Swedish police recently released a map of 55 areas where they publicly admit to having surrendered control to the criminal gangs. These areas have long had problems with mailmen, fire trucks and ambulances being attacked when trying to enter, which has led to them routinely requesting police escort. Now it’s the police being attacked outright.

These no-go zones are primarily so-called “exclusion areas” which is the politically correct term for the 186 ghettos that have sprung up around Sweden in the past two decades. These areas are predominantly populated by immigrants from muslim countries with low education and even lower employment rates. The exception being the enthusiastic entrepreneurs in the fields of drug dealing, protection rackets and robberies.

Since the real law doesn’t apply, the function of justice has largely been taken over by the gangs themselves, not unlike how the mafia is seen as the go-to place in rural Italy when the local police is too corrupt to serve its purpose. Unofficial courts are held and punishments are meted out based on the cultural norms of the dominant gangs. Some no-go areas even have vehicle checkpoints at the border. Not police checkpoints, but the gangs protecting their turf from law enforcement and rival gangs.

This development would have been inconceivable only 20 years ago, and one would think this official surrender by the police would have made big headlines. This is not the case; the most attention it seems to have received in mainstream media is an opinion piece in national paper Svenska Dagbladet.

It can be speculated that this is due to the fact that any reporting on this could be seen as “support” for nationalist party SD that wants to restrict the vast inflow to these ghettos, which is an absolute no-no amongst the journalists and could cost them their jobs. The world’s most extreme immigration from the MENA-region must continue unchallenged, and another 100 000+ must be added annually to the ghetto gangs’ recruitment base.

Edit: Scratch that. They just announced they’re setting the sights higher with a significantly increased immigration for 2015. The new forecast should put the total immigration above 200 000 per year by the time all is said and done.

Edit 2: Some readers have expressed disbelief that things really could be this bad in Sweden. Well, the ambulance union is now demanding military protection gear to enter these no-go zones. If the police releasing an official report isn’t enough, perhaps you will at least listen to the people having to work in these areas?

Vox Wrote:
No one wants this crap, aside from a small handful of "elites." The next time I hear anyone pooh-poohing the idea of a conspiracy theory, I think I will print out this post and make them eat it. Ditto for the next time I hear anyone talk about how great democracy is. If there were a King in charge, we'd know whose head to lop off. But since we're a "democracy," it's all "our" fault that we're being invaded by Muslims -- even though none of us want it. We certainly can't go after "them" -- them who are the "they" that really run the world -- because even bringing up the concept of "them" is a matter of a "conspiracy theory," which is just so obviously insane on its face. Right?

Who is "They"? I guess the way to figure it out is to ask yourself first "cui bono?" -- who benefits? Who'd benefit -- or think they'd benefit -- by having Christendom made powerless? Then ask who could arrange for it to happen? Who is powerful enough to make that happen in spite of what the vast, vast majority of the people living in these invaded lands want? Who can arrange for virtually every newspaper in the land to be on "the right side of history," as this sort of thing is described? Who can make it so pretty much every movie that's ever made shows Christianity as bad, Christians as stupid, and the Catholic Church as the worst of the lot, an institution that's evil to the core and populated by alcoholic pedophiles?

Someone recently said on this forum that we've lost every single battle in the culture wars for the past 60 years. And that's a fact. Now think of the odds. I mean, if everything were random, we'd win about 50% of the time, right? But we don't. We lose e-v-e-r-y  s-i-n-g-l-e  t-i-m-e. And "we" are the vast majority. No such thing as a true conspiracy theory? Ha.
Oh, my gosh... What *^*(^%T HUBRIS. What absolute arrogance. She is an Israeli now -- but she has plans and tells Europe how things are GOING to be, whether they like it or not. This is just sickening:




"I think there's a resurgence in anti-semitism because at this point in time, Europe has not learned how to be multicultural. And I think we're going to be part of the throes of that, of that transformation, which MUST take place. Europe is not gonna be the monolithic, uh, uh, societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make, they are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role, but without that leading role, without that transformation, Europe will not survive."

WTF? How the hell would Europe not survive if it's not invaded by Muslims and Africans and whoever? How the hell will it survive if it IS so invaded? What is she talking about? And who does she think she is, being a former American who made aliyah and became an Israeli, telling Europe what "MUST" happen? She said that Jews are leading this, and she knows that they "will be" resented because of it -- resented why? Because no one wants it! -- but the people will get it anyway because she and her pals will make it happen.

I am so disgusted right now. I am mad as Hell.
Another Jewish woman talking about how Europe needs to be "multicultural." She says, "You have to really change the policy of immigration inside Europe. This is very important. You have to adapt the educational system and adapt all the, um, self-understanding of the States, uh, they are not any more only white or only Swedish or only Portuguese or only German, they are, um, multicultural places in the world."

-- unlike Israel, which is for Jews only. Of course.



Yeah, this is what the Norwegian people want more of:







Too bad the Norwegians don't have any choice. Nor do any of us, I guess. We get what "they" want to give us. Here's what Belgians are getting:




What's doubly scary about that last video is that the "first generation" Muslims are even more radical than their parents. I.e., they're doing the extreme opposite of integrating and assimilating; they're becoming radicalized.

And the sickest thing of all is that there is no Christianity worth speaking of in place to resist this and to offer European youth something to believe in and fight for. My fear is that European youth will convert to Islam simply because Islam asserts that there's something bigger than they are. Religion -- even bogus, evil ones like Islam -- gives a person a reason to live, gives them meaning. Young men especially want something to fight for. And the watered-down crap-form of "Catholicism" that's typical now isn't nearly enough. There's no reverence, no sense of the sacred. Even priests don't take the Holy Faith seriously. Even the Holy Father himself doesn't seem to. So why should young people who are approached by apologists? But let some cray-cray Muzzie get a hold of them and they'll see seriousness, people who are willing to fight and die for what they believe, and also "exotic-ness," which traditional Catholicism has in spades, but which "Novus Ordo Catholicism" lacks. They'll also see masculine men (caricatures of masculinity, but at least masculine) and women who have a sense of modesty -- something that men want in women (at least any women they'd marry). They'll see order and simplicity as well instead of the chaos that makes for modern secular life.

Along with fighting against that sort of immigration, we need to restore traditional Catholicism. Without it, the West IS lost.
Vox, an excellent series of posts. Quite disturbing, yet hardly surprising, unfortunately.
Allow me to add my own two cents.
The first step in this multiculturalism need not be the immigration of Moslems etc. into the European states. Rather the first step is the erosion of borders as envisioned by the EU and its predecessor treaties. As a Pole, who has observed 10 years under the yoke of the EU, I can say that the nation and its customs are completely disappearing from everyday life. First westernise. Introduce blue-jeans, McDonald's, Playboy, Rock etc. In other words, give the populace its easy gratification. Open the market to foreign companies. ING Bank, Deutsche Bank, etc. Eliminate native industries and protective tariffs (closure of coal mines in Silesia, stop production of clothing etc.). Finally erase borders and integrate into „Europe". In one generation, I can assure you that Poland will no longer be Poland. It will at best be Polish (maybe English or German) speaking France or any other western type society. Eliminate the roots.

In the absence of roots, I will say that sometimes material (referring to material itself as well as non-religious factors) can alone maintain the religiously driven order, although after some time they themselves collapse (1991).

For example during the Soviet era ( I am referring to the post-Stalinist system after 1956), Orthodoxy had nearly disappeared from Russian public consciousness, except for the few pockets of resistance. However, the society still remained conservative from a moral and social point of view. First, vestiges of Orthodox upbringing still remained ingrained. Nevertheless, the Soviet system itself, with the absence of western features, consumerism driven by a free market, along with the presence of central authority guaranteed that the populace remained less inclined to the unfortunately decadent behaviour of western societies. I say this simply based upon my own first hand observations of post-socialist Poland and research in my studies as a student of history. There is some truth that material affects the relations between people. Ultimately, the material situation can provide a framework upon which certain Christian values persist despite the eclipsing of the Church.
Sometimes the Tsarist motto Православие, Самодержавие, Народность (Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nation) reflects the perfect antidote to this craziness. The Church shapes society, the autocracy guarantees the earthly manifestation of the divine for the populace (power, maintenance of hierarchy etc.) and all are tied intrinsically with what it means to be ______ nation (Russian in this case).
Nevertheless, as you probably can guess, the programme I have laid out contradicts the entire globalist, market-oriented and consumerist model dominating contemporary policy.
I hope that this ramble is not too inflammatory, but if I may, I speak what I think.
As someone who is racially mixed (half-Caucasian/half-Japanese), I still want to cry: wake up, white man--the world needs you!

Though what I am, I still identify with Western culture. It is beyond heartbreaking to see the West sell its patrimony (a violation, if you think about it, of the fourth commandment) for a bowl of multi-cultural porridge .

Get up off your knees and start kicking ass.
(11-24-2014, 03:51 PM)Bourbon Apocalypse Wrote: [ -> ]Get up off your knees and start kicking ass.
Although not western, per se, Russia is thus far the only European nation truly „kicking ass". Unfortunately, the world, including my disgraced Polish homeland has been set up against the Russian trend of restoration.
(11-24-2014, 03:51 PM)Bourbon Apocalypse Wrote: [ -> ]As someone who is racially mixed (half-Caucasian/half-Japanese), I still want to cry: wake up, white man--the world needs you!

Though what I am, I still identify with Western culture. It is beyond heartbreaking to see the West sell its patrimony (a violation, if you think about it, of the fourth commandment) for a bowl of multi-cultural porridge .

Get up off your knees and start kicking ass.

It won't happen until and unless European and European-derived people stop wilting and going apoplectic if they're accused of "racism," xenophopbia," "misogynism," "homophobia," "anti-semitism," and the like. Those words have been allowed far, far too much power. I mean, look at the whole "Shirtstorm" controversy I just posted about (see this sub-forum). A grown-ass man crying (literally!) and blubbering because a handful of man-hating feminists called him names. People have got to take those words in utter stride. Those words need to be laughed at, or at least reserved for true instances of such -- which are pretty rare things in the "white world" -- at least in my experience. European and European-derived people have been made absolutely helpless and ineffective because of mere words. It has to stop.

But I fervently pray that real racism and hatred don't get coupled in with European and European-derived people fighting back and protecting their cultures. (note that I use "European and European-derived" instead of "white" because the preservation of our cultures has nothing to do with skin color or true racism. I really hope that E&ED people adopt that phrasing of things to strip any racial overtones from discourse about all of this. I myself sort of cringe when I hear about how "white people" need to wake up because I do hate real racism, and talking in terms of skin color sort of rubs me the wrong way -- and, more importantly, rubs a lot of people the wrong way, thereby making defense of E&ED people ineffective. This is about CULTURE. To that end, I propose "European & European-derived people", with E&ED for short, pronounced "EEDS" in conversation.)


(11-24-2014, 04:38 PM)Vox Clamantis Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-24-2014, 03:51 PM)Bourbon Apocalypse Wrote: [ -> ]As someone who is racially mixed (half-Caucasian/half-Japanese), I still want to cry: wake up, white man--the world needs you!

Though what I am, I still identify with Western culture. It is beyond heartbreaking to see the West sell its patrimony (a violation, if you think about it, of the fourth commandment) for a bowl of multi-cultural porridge .

Get up off your knees and start kicking ass.

It won't happen until and unless European and European-derived people stop wilting and going apoplectic if they're accused of "racism," xenophopbia," "misogynism," "homophobia," "anti-semitism," and the like. Those words have been allowed far, far too much power. I mean, look at the whole "Shirtstorm" controversy I just posted about (see this sub-forum). A grown-ass man crying (literally!) and blubbering because a handful of man-hating feminists called him names. People have got to take those words in utter stride. Those words need to be laughed at, or at least reserved for true instances of such -- which are pretty rare things in the "white world" -- at least in my experience. European and European-derived people have been made absolutely helpless and ineffective because of mere words. It has to stop.

But I fervently pray that real racism and hatred don't get coupled in with European and European-derived people fighting back and protecting their cultures. (note that I use "European and European-derived" instead of "white" because the preservation of our cultures has nothing to do with skin color or true racism. I really hope that E&ED people adopt that phrasing of things to strip any racial overtones from discourse about all of this. I myself sort of cringe when I hear about how "white people" need to wake up because I do hate real racism, and talking in terms of skin color sort of rubs me the wrong way -- and, more importantly, rubs a lot of people the wrong way, thereby making defense of E&ED people ineffective. This is about CULTURE. To that end, I propose "European & European-derived people", with E&ED for short, pronounced "EEDS" in conversation.)

Vox, you are much more prudent in your use of "European and European-derived people" than I was in my phrasing.  I was a bit hasty in my racially-loaded use of the phrase "white man," but, hell, I get pretty damn tired of the media dumping upon white men. Nonetheless, I, too, cringe when the emphasis is placed more on melatonin than culture, though I am a "racial realist," for whatever that matters. In addition, teaching at a community college in the Deep South that is becoming, each semester, more and more racially polarized and politically correct has made me very sensitive to such issues.

Jesus, Mary, Joseph, bless us now and at the hour of our social and political and cultural death. 
(11-24-2014, 05:18 PM)Bourbon Apocalypse Wrote: [ -> ]Vox, you are much more prudent in your use of "European and European-derived people" than I was in my phrasing.  I was a bit hasty in my racially-loaded use of the phrase "white man," but, hell, I get pretty damn tired of the media dumping upon white men. Nonetheless, I, too, cringe when the emphasis is placed more on melatonin than culture, though I am a "racial realist," for whatever that matters. In addition, teaching at a community college in the Deep South that is becoming, each semester, more and more racially polarized and politically correct has made me very sensitive to such issues.

Jesus, Mary, Joseph, bless us now and at the hour of our social and political and cultural death.

I consider myself a "race realist" as well -- one who also thinks that all races are absolutely equal in dignity, in belovedness by God, and in deserving charity and respect. And I'm also extremely sick and tired of how white people, especially white men, are treated as some great evil. It's disgusting, and it's so incredibly common and overt.  It'd be fair if we were to defend ourselves using the same rhetoric -- i.e., by using phrases like "white people" -- but I don't think it'd be effective because the people who tend to defend white people now and use that sort of phrasing are noxious Nazi types who often hate other races (which I totally differentiate from speaking realistically, and gently and with charity, in terms of stats and such). More importantly, even though the race-baiters want to make it (and everything) about race, this, like I said, isn't about race; it's about culture. Defending European and traditional American cultures by referring to "European and European-derived" totally takes away from multiculturalists a very obvious route of attack that'd be there if "whiteness" were referred to. It puts the focus right where it needs to be, and invites those of other races who honor those cultures to live in those societies as well.