FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums

Full Version: 54 Of 67 German Bishops Support Communion For Protestants
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
https://gloria.tv/article/RUUQ9DyDwkDq2FDgSF9AoUnmS

                                                   The destruction of all but a remnant of the Catholic Church is coming upon us more rapidly now.
Aaaaand that would necessarily mean that they themselves are not Catholic..
Allegedly conservative, Cardinal Napier of South Africa appears to have come out in favor of communion with Protestants as well https://gloria.tv/article/9ppapgRfxMWq4dBQSJU1YAiVq
wow.. nearly unbelivable

but then again, maybe not. If a person doesn't believe the Host is actually Jesus... reminds me of this story of some saint who actually could see Jesus entering people at Communion. She said he was extremely reluctant to enter some of the communicants.. because of the state of their soul.. hadn't been to confession for serious sins..

yes, that is hard to believe, that she saw Jesus visibly but she is a saint. Why would she lie?
I don't think this is quite heresy, rather rash or bad pastoring.  From what I've read, they are not proposing indiscriminate communion to Protestants, but rather in certain cases where there is good faith, the person is otherwise properly disposed, etc. 

The principle that baptized Christians separated in good faith can receive the other sacraments fruitfully was discussed at Vatican II--interestingly enough, the explicit justification for it is found in the original schemas (the one Archbishop Lefebvre said were perfectly orthodox) which cited to the treatise on the Eucharist by Cardinal Gasparri (the man St. Pius X put in charge of the first code of canon law). The relevant portions include:


Quote:In communities separated from the Church, sacraments besides baptism are sometimes
validly conferred, and it can happen that the children of the Church can and even must rightly
request the administration of those sacraments by separated ministers. On the other hand, kindly
Mother Church most greatly desires that the separated brethren, insofar as it is possible and they
need it, come to share in the many goods which Christ entrusted to his Bride alone;13
for, as properly baptized, they too, if they are in good faith, are per se capable of receiving the other
sacraments fruitfully.14 Finally, the Church, although reluctantly, does tolerate mixed marriages,
in which the Catholic party and the baptized non-Catholic party are the ministers of the
sacrament. For all these reasons, not every active participation by which dissident Christians
have some effective part in Catholic liturgy, or by which Catholics take a similarly active part in
the liturgy of the separated brethren, must be considered of itself intrinsically evil, even if quite
often such participation must, for serious reasons, be prohibited. Therefore, the Church has the
right and duty to lay down laws on communion in worship for the good both of the Church and
of those who are unfortunately separated from her.
....
Consequently, the active participation of dissident Christians both in the very worship of
the Church in general and in particular receptions of the sacraments generally cannot be
permitted, since, intrinsically, it is contrary to the unity of faith and communion and,
extrinsically, it obscures the sign of the unity of the Body of Christ, and from such defects the
dangers of religious indifferentism, interconfessionalism, and scandal often flow.

Whether and under what conditions the Church can assist with the sacraments those who have not departed
from the Church by their own act is to be determined in the first place by the seriousness of their
need or of the great spiritual benefit to them.
https://jakomonchak.files.wordpress.com/...s-1-11.pdf

Despite not being in the final decrees, these principles are incorporated into canon law (specifically 912 and following). 

It seems logical to me that a baptized person in good faith can receive the other sacraments fruitfully (provided, in the case of the Eucharist, they discern the Body and Blood of the Lord). That being said, the Church has traditionally acted with an abundance of caution in this regard based only on what is external (who can judge good faith with certainty?), which the current German "guidelines" seem to not do (a trend not limited to the Germans these days...).
Pope Francis and the German Bishops will answer to GOD one day, lets not forget its his Church not ours, they are attacking GOD
And the world groaned to find itself Modernist.
Well if a majority of bishops support it, then it must be true.  Because the Church is a democracy.
(04-05-2018, 05:00 PM)SaintSebastian Wrote: [ -> ] It seems logical to me that a baptized person in good faith can receive the other sacraments fruitfully (provided, in the case of the Eucharist, they discern the Body and Blood of the Lord). That being said, the Church has traditionally acted with an abundance of caution in this regard based only on what is external (who can judge good faith with certainty?), which the current German "guidelines" seem to not do (a trend not limited to the Germans these days...).

It's still intellectually dishonest, because then you're sort of making a Catch-22. When one receives Holy Communion they are also publicly declaring that they are in a state of grace and that they are in agreement with all the dogma and doctrines of the Catholic Church, which if they truly do then they would be Catholic. Also (I'm going to butcher this in layman's terms), Holy Communion is not just communion with Christ, you are united along with all the faithful, living and dead. That includes the Pope, so you are technically sort of declaring that you're in full communion with the Pope when you receive Holy Communion.
(04-05-2018, 11:44 AM)Eric F Wrote: [ -> ]https://gloria.tv/article/RUUQ9DyDwkDq2FDgSF9AoUnmS

                                                   The destruction of all but a remnant of the Catholic Church is coming upon us more rapidly now.

It's terrible, but not impossible. The Arian heresy took over a large portion of bishops, other clergy, and laity for example.
Pages: 1 2