FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums
Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - Printable Version

+- FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums (https://www.fisheaters.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Church (https://www.fisheaters.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Forum: Catholicism (https://www.fisheaters.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Thread: Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal (/showthread.php?tid=32228)

Pages: 1 2 3


Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - Credo - 11-23-2009

Linked is the Ordinary text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal. The whole "for many/for all" issue is now a moot point.

Third Edition of the Roman Missal - http://www.usccb.org/romanmissal/examples.shtml




Re: Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - Historian - 11-23-2009

And yet the Latin remains the same, right?

Well, it has been long in coming, but I'm glad it is almost here.


Re: Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - Ravenonthecross - 11-23-2009

Is it me:or is this rather "anti-climatic?" I say not jokingly, but rather,having examined the changes posted on the USSBC, they don't really change the text of the Novus Ordo much; it is still not terribly close to the depth of the Tridentine Mass's prayers, which even though I attend only the Novus Ordo [out of necessity; never having had the chance to go to a TLM], I recognize the intrinsic superiority of the TLM.


Re: Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - Historian - 11-23-2009

(11-23-2009, 11:22 AM)Ravenonthecross Wrote: Is it me:or is this rather "anti-climatic?" I say not jokingly, but rather,having examined the changes posted on the USSBC, they don't really change the text of the Novus Ordo much; it is still not terribly close to the depth of the Tridentine Mass's prayers, which even though I attend only the Novus Ordo [out of necessity; never having had the chance to go to a TLM], I recognize the intrinsic superiority of the TLM.

No, it is just a new translation of the original Latin, to be more literal. The original text remains the same, so that isn't resolved yet.


Re: Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - Norbert - 11-23-2009

Is the NO going to be changed in it's entirity to this missal?  And if so, when?


Re: Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - Louis_Martin - 11-23-2009

Isn't this the 1st edition of the Roman Missal?  Before this we had "sacramentaries".  It always confused me, because there was the General Instruction of the Roman Missal, but no missal it related to.


Re: Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - trident59 - 11-23-2009

Raven,
Although I welcome the change, it still boils down to the "weakness" of the Novus Ordo (OF to those who are PC) prayers.
A weak sister is still a weak sister no matter how she dresses and acts.



Re: Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - SaintRafael - 11-23-2009

(11-23-2009, 07:14 AM)Credo Wrote: Linked is the Ordinary text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal. The whole "for many/for all" issue is now a moot point.

At the very least, this shuts down the years of debate over invalidity of the Mass due to "for all/for many".  Now traditional Catholics get get on with more serious matters.


Re: Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - Vetus Ordo - 11-23-2009

(11-23-2009, 04:29 PM)SaintRafael Wrote:
(11-23-2009, 07:14 AM)Credo Wrote: Linked is the Ordinary text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal. The whole "for many/for all" issue is now a moot point.

At the very least, this shuts down the years of debate over invalidity of the Mass due to "for all/for many".  Now traditional Catholics get get on with more serious matters.

Yes, because the invalidity of the Mass is a "minor" matter.


Re: Text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal - SaintRafael - 11-23-2009

(11-23-2009, 04:32 PM)Vetus Ordo Wrote:
(11-23-2009, 04:29 PM)SaintRafael Wrote:
(11-23-2009, 07:14 AM)Credo Wrote: Linked is the Ordinary text of the 3d Edition of the Roman Missal. The whole "for many/for all" issue is now a moot point.

At the very least, this shuts down the years of debate over invalidity of the Mass due to "for all/for many".  Now traditional Catholics get get on with more serious matters.

Yes, because the invalidity of the Mass is a "minor" matter.

It's not that it was a "minor" matter, but there was sufficient evidence to convincingly show that "for all" did not invalidate the Mass. The whole "intend what the Church intends" problem was always ten times more serious.