FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums
The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - Printable Version

+- FishEaters Traditional Catholic Forums (https://www.fisheaters.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Church (https://www.fisheaters.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Forum: Catholicism (https://www.fisheaters.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Thread: The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW (/showthread.php?tid=74844)

Pages: 1 2


The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - Qoheleth - 02-23-2016

:LOL: :crazy:

http://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/fetzen-fliegen/item/2337-the-sspx-must-be-regularized-now


Re: The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - Eric F - 02-23-2016


                                               
                                                                        And somewhere, people are asking how exactly does this violate Catholic teaching.


Re: The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - GangGreen - 02-23-2016

I feel ashamed that this took place in Italy.


Re: The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - Credidi Propter - 02-23-2016

The title is confusing. The link says "must not be regularized" but the article title and this thread title say that it should be. The article itself suggests that being regularized would be dangerous. According to the article, Pope Francis would be able to control it and that he would destroy it.


Re: The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - DeoDuce - 02-23-2016


(02-23-2016, 04:07 PM)Credidi Propter Wrote: The title is confusing. The link says "must not be regularized" but the article title and this thread title say that it should be. The article itself suggests that being regularized would be dangerous. According to the article, Pope Francis would be able to control it and that he would destroy it.

The link say they must regularize on my phone? Also the article seems to be satire


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Re: The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - Truecharity - 02-23-2016

[Image: xptt2x.jpg]
https://twitter.com/Pontifex/status/700041659862663169


Re: The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - austenbosten - 02-23-2016

(02-23-2016, 07:05 PM)Truecharity Wrote: [Image: xptt2x.jpg]
https://twitter.com/Pontifex/status/700041659862663169

Okay I'm going to not be a prisoner of the past...hence a 50-year old pastoral council that doesn't mean anything in the grand scheme of things, because it's not an actual ecumenical council.


Re: The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - Zea mays - 02-23-2016

it means singing a new church into being.




Re: The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - Jeanannemarie - 02-23-2016

:LOL: I watched it this morning, and I thought it looked like an aerobics class, if it weren't so pathetic, it would be funny.  I am becoming desensitized to these things and do not even register surprise anymore.  The worst I ever saw was that priest dancing down the aisle with the Baby Jesus for the Nativity, a procession of some sort done by him, wildly tossing the statue.  I wish I could find it.  But alas would not know how to post it anyway. 


Re: The SSPX MUST Regularize NOW - charlesh - 02-23-2016

I just watched it and am presently vomitting all over myself. Compared to the video, the vomit isn't so bad.