06-16-2017, 02:23 PM
(06-11-2017, 08:50 PM)Zubr Wrote: Some more questions...I would argue that, by and large, lust for one's spouse is rarely a problem in marriage. A husband is allowed to desire his wife, and a wife is allowed to desire her husband. Like Josef Silouan said, how would you confess it? If you said "I desired my wife once this week" would the priest think this is a sin? What if you said "I desired her twenty times"? If something isn't a sin, it isn't a sin. I wouldn't think any amount of desire for your spouse could be "lust." Now, the nature of the desire could be lust (I guess if he thought "I need to find something to have sex with....I guess my wife will do..." that could be lust). But having been married for seven years, I can't imagine that kind of desire really happening. When you're married, you usually know the spouse too well to objectify him or her.
My husband chases me around the house and just doesn't leave me alone. At what point does this become inordinate desire? How am I to know when this is objectification? And if so, am I to feel guilty for that? I know we're newlyweds but he's not a young guy that just got a wife and can't handle himself.
Quote:Secondly, sadism is an obvious disorder. I'm fully aware of that and know this is an inordinate desire. How was I to know of this inclination prior to marriage since we were chaste? How does one rectify this? This is where I know sin is being committed. And no, this did not emerge from pornography as he has minimal interest in that and never did.This is more disturbing, and I don't want to ask for too much detail, but "sadism" seems like a broad term. For instance, my wife is terrified of bugs. If I laugh when she freaks out because she saw a spider, that is I suppose slightly sadistic. After all, I'm finding amusement in her suffering. But if I put a bug on her, that would be going farther. And if I tied her up in a room full of cockroaches, that would obviously be much worse. I would probably say that the first is "normal," the second is "mean," and the third is "sadistic." But by a technical definition, all of them involve some degree of sadism. I suspect a truly saintly man wouldn't do any of them. But most of us have imperfections.
I would advise (not that I know everything) that anything degrading, harmful, or dangerous needs to be avoided. But on the other hand (to put it delicately) a certain degree of playfulness and "naughtiness" are probably normal. It's sort of like why it's hard to have sex while looking at the icons. Overthinking it ruins it (and leads to feelings of guilt, etc.). To be clear, I think you're probably talking about real sadism, which is obviously a problem and which shouldn't be written off as playfulness, etc.