Blood Libel
#41
(11-29-2009, 01:34 AM)SaintSebastian Wrote: Obviously, as everyone should be justly held accountable (with room for the possibility of mercy of course). The point the Pope was making however, is that these actions weren't actually committed--that's why when he adds the part about one being caught in commission of the act, he says "which we do not believe."

My point is--and this goes to vps's point too--there's enough anti-Christian things in the Talmud or in historical events to make the point that Judaism as a religion is staunchly opposed TO Christianity (just as there is plenty of verifiable historical evidence that Islam historically tends to violence rather than peace) without having to grasp at accusations that are dubious at best--especially because that dubiousness is in large part caused by the fact that Christians were faking these things often enough for a Pope to have to point it out.

The case in question of little St Hugh of Lincoln and St Simon of Trent could hardly be described as being "dubious".
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Blood Libel - by John92 - 11-17-2009, 08:53 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Historian - 11-17-2009, 09:10 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by stvincentferrer - 11-17-2009, 09:29 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by GuyIncognito - 11-17-2009, 10:17 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by stvincentferrer - 11-17-2009, 10:24 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by John92 - 11-17-2009, 11:16 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by stvincentferrer - 11-17-2009, 11:32 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Arun - 11-17-2009, 11:49 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Anastasia - 11-18-2009, 12:38 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by Bonifacius - 11-18-2009, 01:13 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by Baskerville - 11-18-2009, 03:30 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by Vetus Ordo - 11-18-2009, 05:57 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by veritatem_dilexisti - 11-18-2009, 09:27 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by John92 - 11-18-2009, 10:39 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by devotedknuckles - 11-18-2009, 12:42 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Vetus Ordo - 11-18-2009, 01:24 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Cyriacus - 11-18-2009, 04:55 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by John92 - 11-18-2009, 05:08 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Pilgrim - 11-18-2009, 06:52 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Historian - 11-18-2009, 06:57 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Cyriacus - 11-18-2009, 07:58 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Pilgrim - 11-18-2009, 09:33 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Joshua - 11-18-2009, 10:27 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by anamchara - 11-18-2009, 10:45 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by John92 - 11-18-2009, 11:09 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by mike6240 - 11-18-2009, 11:53 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Baskerville - 11-19-2009, 12:37 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by Baskerville - 11-19-2009, 12:40 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by winoblue1 - 11-19-2009, 03:29 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by Vetus Ordo - 11-19-2009, 05:21 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by anamchara - 11-19-2009, 07:09 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by mike6240 - 11-19-2009, 07:21 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by Baskerville - 11-19-2009, 11:25 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by Vetus Ordo - 11-20-2009, 07:36 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by voxpopulisuxx - 11-20-2009, 06:07 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by John92 - 11-20-2009, 09:00 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by SaintSebastian - 11-28-2009, 03:48 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by voxpopulisuxx - 11-28-2009, 08:33 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by Arun - 11-28-2009, 09:26 PM
Re: Blood Libel - by SaintSebastian - 11-29-2009, 01:34 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by Arun - 11-29-2009, 01:43 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by SaintSebastian - 11-29-2009, 02:00 AM
Re: Blood Libel - by Arun - 11-29-2009, 03:41 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)