Wild speculation on the 3rd Secret 'secrecy' please
#21
(04-10-2010, 05:15 AM)Baskerville Wrote:
(04-10-2010, 04:09 AM)Iuvenalis Wrote:
(04-10-2010, 03:43 AM)GeorgeT Wrote:It may or may not be the case, but he might believe it has been revealed. Remember, he wrote part of the interpretation of the part of the third secret that was released (which was proported to be the full third secret). I don't think he believes this, but stranger things have happened.

I also assume he's no dummy, I suspect he knows what the 3rd Secret is, in fact, he's contradicted himself at least once on this count-- so I have to think there's a reason to 'hide' it

Yes there is a reason it condemns the Vatican II religion.

I reckon it does more than that.  I reckon it is such a clear warning not to do what they did that when Catholics find out what happened they'll insist that the last four Popes are dug up, their remains burned and thrown into the Tiber.  They'll be seen to have disobeyed an explicit mandate from Heaven.  And that is why they've buried it because if they did not it would bury them.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Wild speculation on the 3rd Secret 'secrecy' please - by ggreg - 04-11-2010, 06:27 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)