The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all"

Thread Modes

The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all"

Stubborn Offline

Posts: 4,995
Threads: 54
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2006

#37

12-18-2010, 11:19 AM

Trent seems clear enough......the Vulgate is free from error in doctrine and morals.

Why worry about what St. Jerome did, did not do or why he did what he did? Bestter to be glad he did what he did and be done with it no?

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Zakhur - 11-30-2010, 07:52 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 11-30-2010, 08:07 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 11-30-2010, 08:09 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 11-30-2010, 10:27 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by INPEFESS - 11-30-2010, 10:47 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Zakhur - 11-30-2010, 11:31 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by MMLJ - 12-03-2010, 05:25 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-08-2010, 05:56 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-09-2010, 12:43 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by NorthernTrad - 12-09-2010, 11:01 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Zakhur - 12-10-2010, 08:48 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-12-2010, 12:37 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Justin - 12-12-2010, 02:18 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-12-2010, 05:29 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by AxxeArp - 12-12-2010, 06:20 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-12-2010, 06:24 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Grasshopper - 12-12-2010, 06:45 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-12-2010, 06:50 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Grasshopper - 12-12-2010, 06:54 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-12-2010, 06:56 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Grasshopper - 12-12-2010, 07:18 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-12-2010, 08:46 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-12-2010, 08:49 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-14-2010, 10:54 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-17-2010, 01:40 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-17-2010, 03:15 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-17-2010, 06:46 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 12-17-2010, 07:17 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by SouthpawLink - 12-17-2010, 09:14 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 01:15 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-18-2010, 01:19 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 12-18-2010, 02:18 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-18-2010, 07:43 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 12-18-2010, 10:38 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 10:48 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 12-18-2010, 11:16 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 11:19 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 12-18-2010, 11:32 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 11:39 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-18-2010, 12:12 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Justin - 12-18-2010, 12:16 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 12:37 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-18-2010, 12:42 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 01:05 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-18-2010, 01:19 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 01:28 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Justin - 12-18-2010, 01:36 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-18-2010, 01:58 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by SouthpawLink - 12-18-2010, 02:25 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-18-2010, 06:32 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-18-2010, 07:52 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-20-2010, 01:38 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 02:53 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 05:07 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 05:21 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 08:57 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 09:05 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 09:35 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 10:16 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 10:35 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 11:54 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 12:06 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 12:14 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 12:19 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 12:50 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 01:28 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 01:38 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 01:38 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Vetus Ordo - 12-20-2010, 02:18 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 02:19 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-20-2010, 05:42 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 05:44 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-20-2010, 11:49 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-21-2010, 01:52 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Vetus Ordo - 12-21-2010, 06:06 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-21-2010, 06:22 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-21-2010, 06:37 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-21-2010, 09:36 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-22-2010, 12:37 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 09:53 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 10:09 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 10:12 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-22-2010, 02:16 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-22-2010, 05:46 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-22-2010, 06:01 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 09:32 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 09:56 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-22-2010, 11:21 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 11:34 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-23-2010, 01:37 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-23-2010, 04:21 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-24-2010, 08:35 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-25-2010, 04:35 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-27-2010, 01:22 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-27-2010, 03:34 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-27-2010, 05:50 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-28-2010, 08:26 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-29-2010, 03:04 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Justin - 12-29-2010, 04:46 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-29-2010, 04:59 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Justin - 12-29-2010, 05:26 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-29-2010, 06:22 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-29-2010, 06:28 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by charlesh - 12-30-2010, 03:56 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-30-2010, 07:31 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by charlesh - 12-30-2010, 01:36 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-30-2010, 03:10 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-30-2010, 05:05 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-30-2010, 05:43 PM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Tweets by FishEaters

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me