SSPX says no to Rome
#91
(07-17-2012, 11:17 AM)jonbhorton Wrote: I see not only a corollary to Protestantism, but also the Pharisees and Sadducees,
...

The Church is Israel, and boy oh boy, don't we play the part. 

Tell us, then, since you point out that protestants have quoted St. Paul to the Galatians to justify their heresy, have you any application of it to anybody today?  Because it is, you know, the Word of God.

Also, keep in mind that the Pharisees and Sadducees were the officials of the church of the Old Law.

Those of us who apply St. Paul's instruction concerning those who preach a new gospel, to the wolves in the clothing of sheep that our Lord told us very forcefully to beware of, cannot be playing the part of the Pharisees or the Sadducees, since we have no official role.  We'd be much more like the outcasts and lepers and tax-collectors whom Our Lord was displaying such scandalous interest in.

But yes, boy oh boy, don't you play the part.  All for obedience and sticking by the letter of the law, and very, very concerned that men like Muller, who is responsible for his writings and can speak perfectly well for himself, is defended by legalistic and totally unreasonable arguments.

Did Muller defend himself?  No.  He poured scorn on his critics.  Did he even ask you to interevene on his behalf?  Of course not.  He's happy with what he wrote, and the fact that it leads people to doubt about Our Lady's virginal honour does not bother him.  So why not leave him in his chosen swill and let the faithful who are outraged by his filth warn others against him?  Muller's reputation clearly matters a whole lot more to you than it does to him.  Let that be a conclusive argument for you.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
SSPX says no to Rome - by Petertherock - 07-14-2012, 06:58 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by tmw89 - 07-14-2012, 07:02 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by GottmitunsAlex - 07-14-2012, 07:04 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Petertherock - 07-14-2012, 07:05 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by tmw89 - 07-14-2012, 07:06 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Gerard - 07-14-2012, 07:29 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by GottmitunsAlex - 07-14-2012, 07:34 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Gerard - 07-14-2012, 07:39 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by JayneK - 07-14-2012, 08:15 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by John Lane - 07-14-2012, 08:21 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Historian - 07-14-2012, 08:24 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by salus - 07-14-2012, 08:48 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by James02 - 07-14-2012, 08:53 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by St. Pius of Trent - 07-14-2012, 08:55 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Stubborn - 07-14-2012, 09:13 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by The Dying Flutchman - 07-14-2012, 09:30 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Crusader_Philly - 07-14-2012, 10:07 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by B of Navarre - 07-14-2012, 11:03 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Guardian - 07-14-2012, 11:06 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by SouthpawLink - 07-15-2012, 01:26 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-15-2012, 01:34 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by MorganHiver - 07-15-2012, 02:56 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by TS Aquinas - 07-15-2012, 03:01 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by SLCFranciscan - 07-15-2012, 02:29 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-15-2012, 07:57 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by The Dying Flutchman - 07-15-2012, 08:06 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by The Dying Flutchman - 07-15-2012, 08:17 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by John Lane - 07-15-2012, 08:57 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-15-2012, 09:34 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Stubborn - 07-15-2012, 09:41 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by The Dying Flutchman - 07-15-2012, 09:52 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-15-2012, 09:58 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by SouthpawLink - 07-15-2012, 11:00 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Doce Me - 07-15-2012, 11:23 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-15-2012, 11:27 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-15-2012, 11:28 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by John Lane - 07-15-2012, 11:49 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by INPEFESS - 07-16-2012, 12:01 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Adeodatus01 - 07-16-2012, 01:27 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Crusader_Philly - 07-16-2012, 01:30 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by GottmitunsAlex - 07-16-2012, 02:05 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-16-2012, 02:25 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Crusader_Philly - 07-16-2012, 02:40 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by GottmitunsAlex - 07-16-2012, 02:44 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-16-2012, 03:00 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Crusader_Philly - 07-16-2012, 03:03 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-16-2012, 03:12 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by MorganHiver - 07-16-2012, 03:14 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by GottmitunsAlex - 07-16-2012, 03:16 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Guardian - 07-16-2012, 03:27 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Crusader_Philly - 07-16-2012, 03:31 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Crusader_Philly - 07-16-2012, 03:33 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Guardian - 07-16-2012, 03:42 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Guardian - 07-16-2012, 03:49 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by INPEFESS - 07-16-2012, 03:51 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Guardian - 07-16-2012, 03:55 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by GottmitunsAlex - 07-16-2012, 04:00 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by INPEFESS - 07-16-2012, 04:04 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Guardian - 07-16-2012, 04:11 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by INPEFESS - 07-16-2012, 04:11 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by INPEFESS - 07-16-2012, 04:14 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Guardian - 07-16-2012, 04:17 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Guardian - 07-16-2012, 04:20 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by INPEFESS - 07-16-2012, 04:23 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by MorganHiver - 07-16-2012, 04:23 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Stubborn - 07-16-2012, 05:33 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by JayneK - 07-16-2012, 07:21 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Habitual_Ritual - 07-16-2012, 08:13 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by JayneK - 07-16-2012, 11:19 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Habitual_Ritual - 07-16-2012, 11:34 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by jonbhorton - 07-16-2012, 11:38 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Crusader_Philly - 07-16-2012, 11:52 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by jonbhorton - 07-16-2012, 11:59 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by JayneK - 07-16-2012, 12:00 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Dellery - 07-16-2012, 12:15 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by JayneK - 07-16-2012, 12:44 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Stubborn - 07-16-2012, 03:26 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-16-2012, 03:45 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by DeiMateralma - 07-16-2012, 03:58 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Stubborn - 07-16-2012, 04:01 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-16-2012, 04:13 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Allan - 07-16-2012, 04:49 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Joshua - 07-16-2012, 04:55 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by newyorkcatholic - 07-16-2012, 05:00 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by newyorkcatholic - 07-16-2012, 05:01 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by DeiMateralma - 07-16-2012, 05:13 PM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Habitual_Ritual - 07-17-2012, 10:59 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by JayneK - 07-17-2012, 11:09 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by FHM310 - 07-17-2012, 11:12 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by jonbhorton - 07-17-2012, 11:17 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by John Lane - 07-17-2012, 11:35 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Habitual_Ritual - 07-17-2012, 11:36 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Habitual_Ritual - 07-17-2012, 11:40 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by SouthpawLink - 07-17-2012, 11:45 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Adeodatus01 - 07-20-2012, 12:00 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Gerard - 07-20-2012, 12:57 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Crusader_Philly - 07-20-2012, 01:51 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by GottmitunsAlex - 07-20-2012, 01:54 AM
Re: SSPX says no to Rome - by Crusader_Philly - 07-20-2012, 02:01 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)