The "uglification" of a church
#26
CollegeCatholic –

The sign was specific to “firearms,” not the person carrying the firearm – The brass sign has clearly been erected many years prior to the passage of 2011 Wisconsin Act 35.  Therefore, the sign applies equally to cops as well as all the other dirty (lawfully armed ) scum who may wish to enter the church and praise and worship Our Lord.  I noticed however that the "Old St. Mary’s" church just a couple blocks away, had no such sign and indeed niether did any of the other churchs I visited (including the lovely little Episcopalian Cathedral) – so why the disparity? 

I would like to know, scripturally or liturgically or where in the catechism or anywhere in Catholic dogma that firearms have been declared to be profane?

(10-19-2012, 08:11 PM)DrBombay Wrote: Perhaps the pastor should carry a gun?  Would that be considered kosher?  :sneaky:

Come join me out west – We’ll go to Mass where the celebrating priest, and the decon are both packing (not to mention at least a quarter of the congregation). 

(10-20-2012, 02:27 AM)Hawaii Five-0 Wrote: That's not a dove.  It's only a wishbone from a dove... or a chicken. :puke:

Only a pastor who thinks that firearms are profane could think that wishbone is a dove.

Cheers!

Caoimhín P. Connell

(The opinions expressed here are exclusively my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect my professional opinion, opinion of my employer, agency, peers, or professional affiliates. The above post is for information only and does not reflect professional advice and is not intended to supercede the professional advice of others.)

AMDG

Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by DrBombay - 10-17-2012, 10:00 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Lycorth - 10-17-2012, 10:29 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Pheo - 10-17-2012, 10:33 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Lycorth - 10-17-2012, 10:47 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Poche - 10-18-2012, 12:37 AM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Guardian - 10-19-2012, 12:14 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by sw85 - 10-19-2012, 06:49 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by DrBombay - 10-19-2012, 08:11 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Lateran15 - 10-19-2012, 08:13 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Lateran15 - 10-19-2012, 08:17 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by DrBombay - 10-19-2012, 08:18 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Lateran15 - 10-19-2012, 08:36 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by CaoimhinPConnell - 10-20-2012, 09:51 AM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by moneil - 10-20-2012, 10:43 AM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Lycorth - 10-20-2012, 08:27 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by DrBombay - 10-20-2012, 08:59 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by MRose - 10-20-2012, 09:06 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Lateran15 - 10-20-2012, 09:43 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by DrBombay - 10-20-2012, 09:48 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Lateran15 - 10-20-2012, 10:31 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by DrBombay - 10-20-2012, 11:03 PM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by Lateran15 - 10-21-2012, 12:47 AM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by moneil - 10-21-2012, 10:33 AM
Re: The "uglification" of a church - by DrBombay - 10-21-2012, 11:43 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)