Liturgical Relativism?
#3
(06-30-2013, 07:17 PM)JayneK Wrote: I think this is an example of what Michael Davies called "time bombs" of Vatican II. It was not the intent of the majority of Council Fathers that the documents be taken as they have, but the vagueness and ambiguity of the wording do permit it.  So technically, it is authorized by Rome.

That's sad to read.

If I were to say this to any official from Rome, they would deny this. It's even more sad that a man of dubious orthodoxy, such as Cardinal Kasper, is the only one to come out say, "Huh? Oh, yeah, there are ambiguities in the documents."

Stuff like that scares me.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Liturgical Relativism? - by RedCaves - 06-30-2013, 06:26 PM
Re: Liturgical Relativism? - by JayneK - 06-30-2013, 07:17 PM
Re: Liturgical Relativism? - by RedCaves - 06-30-2013, 07:29 PM
Re: Liturgical Relativism? - by JayneK - 06-30-2013, 07:39 PM
Re: Liturgical Relativism? - by SaintSebastian - 07-01-2013, 11:16 AM
Re: Liturgical Relativism? - by Tim - 07-01-2013, 11:40 AM
Re: Liturgical Relativism? - by RedCaves - 07-01-2013, 11:49 AM
Re: Liturgical Relativism? - by dark lancer - 07-01-2013, 12:02 PM
Re: Liturgical Relativism? - by lauermar - 07-02-2013, 10:07 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)