Smokers, overweight get pay docked
We knew this was coming. Vox said it in this thread.
Vox Wrote:Today the smokers, tomorrow the sugar-eaters, the overweight, the women who have "too many" children, the men who don't exercise enough...

Firms dock pay of obese, smokers

August 13, 2007

By Gregory Lopes - Companies seeking to cut rising health care costs are starting to dock the pay of overweight and unhealthy workers.

Clarian Health, an Indiana hospital chain, will require workers who smoke to pay $5 out of each paycheck starting in 2009. For workers deemed obese, as much as $30 will be taken out each paycheck until they meet certain weight, cholesterol and blood pressure standards.

Clarian employees will also be required to take part in a health risk appraisal that will inform the company which employees smoke.

Such appraisals are becoming a popular tool for businesses to determine the health of their work force. The type of health benefit program Clarian is setting up could become a model for businesses in coming years, analysts say.

"We anticipate that more employers will require employees to complete a health risk appraisal and participate in screenings," said Tracy Watts, a health benefits consultant for Mercer Human Resource Consulting. "We also are seeing more interest in rewards for healthy behaviors such as participating in health management-related programs and for healthy behaviors such as not using tobacco products."

A survey of nearly 3,000 employers last year by Mercer found that 53 percent required a health risk assessment of its workers. That number is up from 35 percent in 2004.

And 62 percent of the 135 top executives who responded to a PriceWaterhouseCooper's survey this year said their companies should require employees who show unhealthy behaviors to pay a greater share of their health care costs.

Weyco, a Lansing, Mich.,[Me: Remind me never to apply to work here] benefits administrator, recently adopted a policy to completely eliminate tobacco use from its work force. In 2003, the company introduced a policy of not hiring tobacco users and began offering smoking-cessation programs to employees, who were given a year to quit.

"While other employers' health plan costs have spiraled, Weyco's have stayed the same," said Gary Climes, vice president and general manager of Weyco.

While charging workers who smoke more for their health care is becoming a widespread practice, more employers are adopting a punitive approach to employees who take health risks such as letting obesity and high cholesterol go unchecked.

Critics view the latest changes as an encroachment on civil rights.

Last month, the federal government implemented new rules to ensure these stringent wellness programs comply with the nondiscrimination provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

Health care continues to be the No. 1 cost concern for U.S. companies, said Helen Darling, president of the National Business Coalition on Health, a D.C.-based health care consulting firm for large businesses. That concern rises to new levels each year as the cost of providing health insurance for employees increases at twice the rate of inflation, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit health policy organization in California.

While many employers have been using financial incentives to encourage participation in wellness programs, Clarian Health decided to use a more strong-handed approach and charge workers more for their health insurance if they opt not to join a wellness program.

Clarian took the dramatic step of docking workers' paychecks after several years of offering a voluntary wellness initiative. But Clarian's annual health benefit costs increased 12.9 percent in 2006 and nearly 16 percent this year.

"We believe that by using this premium charge approach, where it shows up in employees' paycheck every two weeks, it will keep costs in front of the person and we think it will be more effective at creating behavior change," said Steven Wantz, vice president of human resources at Clarian.

Critics of the cost-cutting strategy accuse businesses of turning their companies into little police states through their health care coverage.

"There are several problems with the current approach," said Jeremy Gruber, legal director for the National Workrights Institute in Princeton, N.J. "The progression of targeting certain groups — first smokers, now overweight people — will allow employers an unlimited amount of information about a person which has nothing to do with how somebody does their job.

"It's clearly discriminatory, as employers ask workers to work longer hours with longer commutes than ever before, to penalize someone because they don't have time to be healthy. It's a huge irony that may run into legal trouble under the Americans with Disabilities Act," Mr. Gruber said.

Employers are not the only ones touting the upside of a healthy lifestyle. UnitedHealthcare, a national health insurer, introduced an insurance plan last year that cuts nearly $4,000 from the annual $5,000 deductible for a family if a worker isn't obese and doesn't smoke.

Edited to add a link to the original story.

Maybe they should review which of their employees engage in high-risk sexual practices and fine them.  I'm tired of paying for abortions, birth control, etc.
This move is a slippery slope -- and it smells of political correctness. Smokers and the obese are obviously at higher risk for illness, and thus higher insurance rates. But why stop there? How about those who engage in unsafe sex practices? How about those who sky dive in their spare time? Things can get out of hand when we start picking and choosing our vices -- and virtues.

Every time I hear a report like this one, I think of George Orwell's book "1984." Folks, in many respects, we're already there...

Last year the State of IN began a program where those who signed a pledge not to use tobacco products had a $500 deductible on their insurance waived. Of course those who signed it were subject to random urine tests for nicotine.
The State of IN is one of the largest employers. I now work for the Health & Hospitals corporation of Marion Co and they are ramping up to begin surveying their employees for smoking, obesity, etc with an eye towards doing something like Clarian has already done.
Imagine what will happen when (not if) the government because the sole payer of health care costs. (we will have socialized medicine in the U.S. by 2010, I would stake a month's salary on it)
There will come a time when companies will be permitted to refuse health care coverage to smokers or the overweight.  
It seems to me that we're witnessing the birth of a politically-correct police state. In this brave new world, all thought, speech and behavior will have to conform to accepted standards. "They" (federal and local government, major corporations, etc.) will have the tools to keep a very close eye on all of us.

If I'd heard someone make this statement 20 years ago, I might have called them "paranoid" or a "conspiracy theorist." That's not the case today.


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)