02-23-2009, 03:57 PM
I just finished watching Michael Wood's 2003 series for PBS on Shakespeare. Throughout the four episodes, Wood adduces evidence that Shakespeare was himself a recusant--though perhaps entirely in secret later in life, as he supported the local Anglican parish in Stratford.
Is anyone here enough of a Shakespeare scholar to assess the extent to which Wood might have been simply trying to attract viewers with sensational claims? Or perhaps have a personal affinity the Faith that would be gratified by his view?
I ask, because I never understood there to be anything more than an absence of any evidence that Shakespeare was or wasn't Catholic.
Is anyone here enough of a Shakespeare scholar to assess the extent to which Wood might have been simply trying to attract viewers with sensational claims? Or perhaps have a personal affinity the Faith that would be gratified by his view?
I ask, because I never understood there to be anything more than an absence of any evidence that Shakespeare was or wasn't Catholic.