Posts: 820
Threads: 37
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2009
7HolyCats Wrote:I think Father showed incredible discretion in his statements. Like St Thomas More. Williamson, on the other hand, was incredibly imprudent, walked right into it.
Bishop Williamson has no hesitation butchering PC sacred cows but I have never heard nor would I ever expect to hear of him gossiping about fellow religious to the yellow press.
•
Posts: 678
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2007
As far as I am aware, imprudence is not a sin; however telling a lie is. I'm sorry, Dom Augustine Oppenheimer, but in the circumstances, I still don't see how Bp. Williamson did anything wrong.
•
Posts: 3,385
Threads: 32
Likes Received: 123 in 75 posts
Likes Given: 30
Joined: Jan 2009
St. Thomas says
imprudence is a sin.
(I don't really know enough about the situation to say whether or not Bishop Williamson actually committed the sin of imprudence.)
•
Posts: 10,571
Threads: 403
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jun 2007
Just as a general point of interest, Father Oppenheimer is the grandson (I think) of the Oppenheimer who built the first atomic bombs. He is definitely related to him, not 100% sure how. I met him once at the seminary. Nice chap, very clever indeed.
•
Posts: 678
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2007
SaintSebastian Wrote:St. Thomas says imprudence is a sin.
(I don't really know enough about the situation to say whether or not Bishop Williamson actually committed the sin of imprudence.)
Thanks, SaintSebastian.:)
I guess time will tell who has been imprudent and who has not.
•