Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article
#80
(06-04-2009, 05:04 PM)GodFirst Wrote:
lamentabili sane Wrote:If one say absolute in a certain situation...but not absolute in another...then it is not to say absolute overall. That's exactly what I said...you just didn't understand it.
No, I understood that clearly. What I don't understand is why you won't accept that DH doesn't even talk about "a right to practice an objectively false religion" when the document doesn't even contain these words.

No, DH does not use those words. What do you think it is giving a right to do?

Quote:2. This Vatican Council declares that the human person has a right to religious freedom. This freedom means that all men are to be immune from coercion on the part of individuals or of social groups and of any human power, in such wise that no one is to be forced to act in a manner contrary to his own beliefs, whether privately or publicly, whether alone or in association with others, within due limits.

The council further declares that the right to religious freedom has its foundation in the very dignity of the human person as this dignity is known through the revealed word of God and by reason itself.(2) This right of the human person to religious freedom is to be recognized in the constitutional law whereby society is governed and thus it is to become a civil right.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article - by lamentabili sane - 06-04-2009, 05:20 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)