Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article
#96
lamentabili sane Wrote:
"GodFirst" Wrote:Exactly what it says it is giving a right to, which is, the right to be free from being forced or coerced into doing something that is against your conscience.
Which means you have a right to do what your conscience says, like practice a false religion. That right must be tied to some duty to practice a false religion.
No. To say you have the right to freely find and accept the truth and not to be treatened into believing it, is not at all to say that you have the right to do whatever your conscience says. You are truly delusional if you can say that. Do you not see your illogical here. What you say above is like saying that just because the Church has the right to can stop people from practicing their false religion, that therefore, She has the right to force people to practice the True Religion, which as we know is not true for non-baptized souls.

Quote:
Quote:Tell me where the Church has ever taught that She has the right to force men to be baptized against their wills.
She does not. But that is not what the issue is here.
Yes, it is.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article - by GodFirst - 06-04-2009, 07:21 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)