Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article
#97
(06-04-2009, 07:19 PM)QuisUtDeus Wrote:
(06-04-2009, 07:03 PM)Borromeo Wrote: I guess I don't understand why a key element is always missed or passed over in the debate/argument over DH.  At the time it was written the Catholic Church and her members were being persecuted and denied worship by the Communist in Eastern Europe, particularly Poland.  There was a very influential Polish archbishop who had a GREAT influence in the writing and pushing forth of DH.  That certain archbishop is a hero to many in Poland because he put his neck on the line, literally. 

It is easy to sit here some 40 odd years later in the comfort of the grand ol' US of A where "freedom rings" behind a keyboard, having no concept of what it is like to be under a communist government.  For those of you against DH and Vatican II, I say to you, how short sighted and exceedingly arrogant you are.  . 

I should have put this in my first comment...

One of the main architects of DH was a Modernist American Jesuit who had been scolded by the Holy Office and his writings suppressed by his superior before V2.  The source of this line of thinking is deeply rooted in the U.S. system, not in those suffering under a Communist system. If you read Fr. Murray's comments, you will see his line of thinking and his goals in working on DH speak for themselves.

Yes, and this battle was fought out in the 1950's in The American Ecclesiastical Review under Monsignor Joseph Clifford Fenton.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article - by lamentabili sane - 06-04-2009, 07:23 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)