Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article
(06-04-2009, 07:37 PM)INPEFESS Wrote:
(06-04-2009, 07:30 PM)GodFirst Wrote:
INPEFESS Wrote:A conscience that is subject to teachings is not objective which defeats the whole purpose of the conscience. It has been created to oppose wrong teaching even if one does not understand why it is wrong. The consience guides teaching; teaching does not guide the conscience. The conscience is always objective in order to discern the evil in false teaching. The subjective conscience is that conscience which is being ignored.
huh? What? Please explain? Are you saying an person's conscience cannot be invincibly ignorant?
My post explained itself. I'm sorry that you do not understand.
Please, help me. How are you helping this thread if you won't explain yourself.
Just because the conscience was created to oppose evil, does not mean that it will always recongnize evil. Hence the reason why a person can sin objectively but not subjectively. No? Is the conscience not to be guided by law (or teaching)?
I think your moral theology might be a little twisted, but then I'm only human like you and could be wrong. That is why I so wish you would explain.

Messages In This Thread
Re: Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article - by GodFirst - 06-04-2009, 07:47 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)