Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article

[lamentabili sane]

DH (and you are defending it) assumes a conscience contrary to this definition:

The rule and measure of duty is not utility, nor expedience, nor the happiness of the greatest number, nor State convenience, nor fitness, order, and the pulchrum. Conscience is not a long-sighted selfishness, nor a desire to be consistent with oneself; but it is a messenger from Him who both in nature and in grace, speaks to us behind a veil, and teaches and rules us by His representatives.

So, you assert that this contradicts DH?  Show me where and how?

Conscience "is a messenger from Him who both in nature and in grace, speaks to us behind a veil, and teaches and rules us by His representatives." DH denies this.