Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article
(06-10-2009, 12:39 AM)lamentabili sane Wrote:
(06-09-2009, 11:07 PM)newschoolman Wrote:
Quote:Again, DH teaches that error has rights. The drafters of DH admit this...why can't you?

Again, it teaches no such thing.  In fact, the Catechism explicitly rejects it.  You are simply repeating a falsehood over and over.

Quote:2108 The right to religious liberty is neither a moral license to adhere to error, nor a supposed right to error,37 but rather a natural right of the human person to civil liberty, i.e., immunity, within just limits, from external constraint in religious matters by political authorities. This natural right ought to be acknowledged in the juridical order of society in such a way that it constitutes a civil right.38

37 Cf. Leo XIII, Libertas praestantissimum 18; Pius XII AAS 1953, 799.
38 Cf. DH 2.

Here's something a friend sent me today:

Quote:Here's a quote on "Error has no rights" from a post V2 reference book: after correctly explaining the phrase, viz. the rights of a sincere but erroneous conscience are in no wise equal to the rights of sincere and correct conscience, it succinctly says, "The Second Vatican Council rejected this thinking in its Declaration on Religious Freedom (n.3)."

Of course, other related articles are long hymns of praise to the heretic John Courtney Murray.

Well, have no fear since the Catechism itself speaks very clearly on the matter.  "The right to religious liberty is neither a moral license to adhere to error, nor a supposed right to error."
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Bishop Sanborn responds to the "rupture theology" article - by newschoolman - 06-10-2009, 10:04 AM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)