Obama to speak at Kennedy's "Catholic" Funeral.
#21
(08-27-2009, 07:20 PM)SanctiDominici Wrote:
(08-27-2009, 02:43 PM)jovan66102 Wrote:
(08-27-2009, 02:30 PM)SanctiDominici Wrote: I saw on the news that Obama was telling other countries that America is NOT a Christian country and shouldnt be considered one. He has some damn nerve! Dont get me started!

Article 11 of the Treat of Tripoli, unanimously advised and consented to by the US Senate on 7 June 1797 and signed by President John Adams on 10 June 1797.

Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.(edited to correct dates)

Except the main reason this country was started was so persecuted christians could have a new land to practice in and the fact that 3/4 of the nation is christian. By my standards, thats a christian country

Well, at the time of the Treaty the percentage of Christians probably approached 100% and they obviously didn't think it was a Christian country.
Reply
#22
What Osama wants is a universal socialist health system which is not Catholic.
Reply
#23
I am sure that it will be a lavish star studded event. I wonder what Mary Jo Kapechnicks was like.

As to Osama Husseein speaking at this of course he would he just cant get enough of himself.
Reply
#24
(08-27-2009, 08:12 PM)Baskerville Wrote: What Osama wants is a universal socialist health system which is not Catholic.
If you strike health from that sentence, you pretty much have the whole Truth.
Reply
#25
(08-27-2009, 08:14 PM)DarkKnight Wrote:
(08-27-2009, 08:12 PM)Baskerville Wrote: What Osama wants is a universal socialist health system which is not Catholic.
If you strike health from that sentence, you pretty much have the whole Truth.

So your saying that the Catholic Church advocates Universalist healthcare? And I dont mean the USCCB in their pretty pink panties but the real Catholic Church pre Vatican II.
Reply
#26
(08-27-2009, 08:19 PM)Baskerville Wrote:
(08-27-2009, 08:14 PM)DarkKnight Wrote:
(08-27-2009, 08:12 PM)Baskerville Wrote: What Osama wants is a universal socialist health system which is not Catholic.
If you strike health from that sentence, you pretty much have the whole Truth.

So your saying that the Catholic Church advocates Universalist healthcare? And I dont mean the USCCB in their pretty pink panties but the real Catholic Church pre Vatican II.


I interpreted Dark Knight as meaning that your statement is too modest:  he means that Obama wants a totally socialst state, not socialism limited to the health care system.
Reply
#27
(08-27-2009, 08:19 PM)Baskerville Wrote:
(08-27-2009, 08:14 PM)DarkKnight Wrote:
(08-27-2009, 08:12 PM)Baskerville Wrote: What Osama wants is a universal socialist health system which is not Catholic.
If you strike health from that sentence, you pretty much have the whole Truth.

So your saying that the Catholic Church advocates Universalist healthcare? And I dont mean the USCCB in their pretty pink panties but the real Catholic Church pre Vatican II.
This is what I meant:
Quote:What Osama wants is a universal socialist ... system which is not Catholic.
Reply
#28
(08-27-2009, 06:38 PM)DarkKnight Wrote: Obama will be playing the part of the voice of God, no doubt wearing his new robes from Notre Dame while assisting Father with the Consecration.

That's obviously not true, but it does paint a sickening, gut-wrenching picture, doesn't it?
Reply
#29
One that the NCR would whole-heartedly endorse, for that matter.
Reply
#30
I don't think the body was even cold yet when I saw the first quote from a Democrat saying this might turn health care around, that people might want to pass it "in Teddy's memory," or some such nonsense.  Of course they'll take that angle if it helps; the end justifies the means.

I'm not sure that would work, though.  An awful lot of the articles about Kennedy today have brought up Chappaquiddick---far more than I expected, and probably more than it's been mentioned during his last dozen elections.  He's being lionized by the extreme Left, but the middle doesn't seem to have forgotten his faults.  I'm not sure turning Obamacare into Teddycare would help right now.  It's a little weird to see someone being criticized more after death than he was before it, but that might be happening.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)