Trance Formation of America by Cathy O'Brien
#1
Anybody read it? I'm about halfway through it, and don't know how seriously I should take it. I don't think I'm going to finish it because it's a revolting read and my gut tells me that it's disinformation. I do find it strange that none of the people Cathy O'Brien accuses have come forward to sue her.
Reply
#2
(09-17-2009, 10:31 PM)stvincentferrer Wrote: Anybody read it? I'm about halfway through it, and don't know how seriously I should take it. I don't think I'm going to finish it because it's a revolting read and my gut tells me that it's disinformation. I do find it strange that none of the people Cathy O'Brien accuses have come forward to sue her.

I would think it's the opposite, that it's anything but disinformation.

From all we've found out over the years about Bohemian Grove, books like "The Franklin Cover Up", government operations like MK-ULTRA, Paperclip and Northwoods, etc., I wouldn't put it past the powers-that-be to do stuff like this.

Not one bit at all.
Reply
#3
(09-18-2009, 06:02 PM)HailGilbert Wrote:
(09-17-2009, 10:31 PM)stvincentferrer Wrote: Anybody read it? I'm about halfway through it, and don't know how seriously I should take it. I don't think I'm going to finish it because it's a revolting read and my gut tells me that it's disinformation. I do find it strange that none of the people Cathy O'Brien accuses have come forward to sue her.

I would think it's the opposite, that it's anything but disinformation.

From all we've found out over the years about Bohemian Grove, books like "The Franklin Cover Up", government operations like MK-ULTRA, Paperclip and Northwoods, etc., I wouldn't put it past the powers-that-be to do stuff like this.

Not one bit at all.


Have you read the book? If you haven't I would encourage you not to since she doesn't hold back with pornographic details. Her claims almost defy belief. Almost. Again, why haven't any of these people sued her. I could see a vivid imagination making all of this up, but how to explain the people she accuses not suing her? I'm at a loss. I'll have to read the Franklin Coverup.
Reply
#4
Vince that would be because ignoring it will be used as proof the author is telling the truth as they are scared to respond to it.

However if the people slandered sue it gives the author publcity free of charge, proof of telling the truth and validation all at once and oh if something happens to the author that's it.

Ignoring it is really all you can do.
Reply
#5
(10-14-2009, 03:53 AM)CatholicCrusade Wrote: Vince that would be because ignoring it will be used as proof the author is telling the truth as they are scared to respond to it.

However if the people slandered sue it gives the author publcity free of charge, proof of telling the truth and validation all at once and oh if something happens to the author that's it.

Ignoring it is really all you can do.

It's still hard to believe her claims, even though you provide good reasons for why nobody attacks her. It just seems so fantastic.

And to think that Jerry Reed is one of my favorite musicians!
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)