Mark of the Beast

[INPEFESS]

Is this sort of dialogue objectively necessary?

Objectively no. Aber, Ich bin Menschliches, Allzumenschliches.

Ok, as are all of us, but I don't have to tell you why that is not a good enough reason to justify unpleasant behavior.

By the way, why the German?

Rosarium, you're more objective than the emotion you've subjected yourself to on this thread.

Yes, I am, however I did write:

The barcodes do not contain the number "sescenti sexaginta sex".

Which was countered with a questioning of whether I read the site (which I did). This keeps coming up. I read the site. Also, if you read my posts, I am repeatedly confronted with accusations and very weird logic and it always defaults to "you didn't read the site".

Ok. I am not a participant in this, so I have no significant investment in the outcome. But just so you know what I'm saying, I agree that he did ask you first whether or not you read the site, but you stepped it up a rather large notch in your first thoroughly explained refutation before he had any chance to reply:

I don't argue with illogical people as it really messes with my head.

Then you posted a rather insulting (in my opinion) mockery of John C’s logic.

Might as well try to convince ALICE the sky is red.

Here is ALICE: http://alice.pandorabots.com/

[Et cetera.]

Things seemed to deteriorate on both ends from there.

(I don't think John C is as logically wrong as some claim he is)

Well, he cleverly refutes any statements with "did you read the site" and whatnot. He never addresses what we say. I considered what he said and the site, and found it to be unrelated. I explained why to connect the Mark/Number of the Beast to barcodes was completely illogical (based on the fact that barcodes do not contain that number, which I demonstrated).

So, for those who consistently refuse to be logical or address the statements I've made, I think I'm entitled to a little personal statements. I surely cannot address his non existent arguments.

When I consider a problem, and think about it, and respond with clearly communicated words, I do think I should be respected a little bit more than to be called a liar and accused of not reading the site.

Ok, well I'm tempted to debate in his place, but I really don't have time for the involvement right now. But yes, you are right that those things aren't good either. I did not say he was innocent and exonerated of all culpability. I just think these little discourses look very bad and, in a word, scandalous, to all those reading (which could be anyone). You were simply the first of the two posters I addressed to see my post (I think).