09-28-2010, 08:42 PM
What is The Real Threat to The Unity of the Roman Rite? Card Ratzinger's Letter.
|
09-28-2010, 10:38 PM
09-28-2010, 10:54 PM
09-29-2010, 12:16 AM
(09-28-2010, 10:54 PM)glgas Wrote: That was approved even the mighty Archbishop Lefebvre, he signed it. All bishops and the pope cannot be wrong. "Not every valid council in the history of the Church has been a fruitful one; in the last analysis, many of them have been a waste of time. Despite all the good to be found in the texts it produced, the last word about the historical value of Vatican Council II has yet to be spoken." Ratzinger, Joseph. Principles of Catholic Theology: building Stones for a Fundamental Theology. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1987, p. 378.
09-29-2010, 12:20 AM
(09-28-2010, 10:38 PM)Unum Sint Wrote:(09-28-2010, 07:23 PM)Gerard Wrote: The real threat to unity is the divisive Council called Vatican II. Smoke can get into the eyes as well as the lungs. Vatican II has plenty of smoke in it to attack, unity, orthodoxy and a whole host of other areas of the Church and the world.
09-29-2010, 12:58 AM
(09-29-2010, 12:20 AM)Gerard Wrote:(09-28-2010, 10:38 PM)Unum Sint Wrote:(09-28-2010, 07:23 PM)Gerard Wrote: The real threat to unity is the divisive Council called Vatican II. Agreed.
09-29-2010, 03:35 AM
Too many people invest V2 with a character it lacks.
09-29-2010, 03:36 AM
09-29-2010, 09:53 PM
(09-28-2010, 10:51 AM)Augstine Baker Wrote:(09-28-2010, 10:18 AM)3Sanctus Wrote: Cardinal Ratzinger made it clear that the unity of the Roman Rite is not today "threatened by a small community, who use the Indult [Permission to Celebrate the Old Mass] and are generally treated like they have the plague, as people not understood, if not even possibly doing something immoral." So how can so many trads be so against him? ??? The evidence is there - he's alright.
09-29-2010, 09:55 PM
(09-28-2010, 10:54 PM)glgas Wrote:(09-28-2010, 07:23 PM)Gerard Wrote: The real threat to unity is the divisive Council called Vatican II. Isn't there strong evidence he was actually tricked into signing support of the new rite? He was blind, of course. It made little sense that he did an about-face so soon after his famed Intervention, with nothing really changed. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)