Evolution
(12-01-2010, 10:50 AM)A Catholic Thinker Wrote:
(11-30-2010, 09:46 PM)steph_86 Wrote: In some respects, I agree with you. It is interesting to note that the Church has not made a definitive statement whatever either on the age of the world - and by relation, the age of humanity - the place of the earth in the universe and the theory of evolution. As far as the place of the earth in the universe is concerned it is seen that she has not officially changed her teaching on geocentrism which following the council of Trent was reasserted during the 16th and 17th centuries since, the Holy Office condemned the real possibility of the heliocentric theory of Galileo to be true, as a heretical.

It would be far more interesting if the Church had made any definitive statement on the age of the world, given that the Church has *never* strayed in the realm of natural science authoritatively.

The age of the universe is also not directly related to whether or not any sort of evolution occurred.


Quote:As far as evolution is concerned, the faithful are required to believe that souls are immediately created by God, that Adam and Eve existed and that all humanity was derived from them (monogenism). Still, it must be said that contrary to popular opinion, science is not a neutral endeavor. Naturalism, is the metaphysical and methodological position of science. According to this perspective, only natural causes are to be sought in order to explain the phenomena occurring within Creation. This is certainly in contradiction to the Catholic Faith for whom, the supernatural is a real, causal agent in the created world. Nevertheless, scientists would rather conjure up very hypothetical explanations in order to divest themselves of the reality of the Divine Intelligence.

Yes, the soul created instantaneously by God and monogenism are required beliefs (as has been covered here).

"Still, it must be said that contrary to popular opinion, science is not a neutral endeavor. Naturalism, is the metaphysical and methodological position of science." - you are making your misunderstanding of natural science evident.  You've been influenced by popular philosophers who want to redefine "science" to include a certain philosophical bent (materialism).  In fact, that is *not science* and not related to natural science.  The Church has always been clear on those things.

I'm not sure how much of the thread you've read, but it is clear your thought process is already to some degree pitting (what you see as) science against the Church (and thus against Truth) - a dangerous and in fact illogical position. 


Quote:It is in this context that the theory of evolution exists. Evolution radically excludes God in the natural world and explains Creation as though it had never been produced ex nihilo out of the Thought and Hands of the Creator God. And this, is the fatal flaw of science since the time of the Renaissance. It attempts to explain the world and its history without any reference to the world of Faith, namely Sacred Scripture. Since that time, Faith and Reason have been dissociated and today it must be said that they are perceived to be in enmity. As such, I am of the opinion that the conviction that science actually undermines Faith is a certainty brought by the evidence of the facts. Rationalism, which has come to the fore, since science came to become the final authority on all knowledge, has contributed to persistent doubt and a skepticism that undermines true, unwavering Faith.

What kind of evolution?  What "radically excludes God"?  By definition, theistic evolution does not exclude God at all.  (As I've said over and over in this thread, I do not accept the common formulation of theistic macroevolution because of the scientific evidence against it.)

What you are speaking of above, actually, is neo-Darwinian evolution - the Darwinian worldview.  It's a rather different subject than "evolution" in general or even macro-evolution in general.

I'm not going to comment on the rest of the post since it's written with this science-vs.-faith bias.  You should study what natural science truly is, how the Church has always viewed it, why it cannot by definition ever contradict the faith, and how, where, and why modern materialistic philosophers attempt to blur the lines between natural science and philosophy.

You could start with the writings of Fr. Stanley Jaki or any of the neo-atheist debunkers (books refuting Dawkins, et al).  They all cover this territory.

Forgive me if my comments seem to have been misunderstood. Regarding the relationship between science and religion, I must say that, in current times, there is a divergence of interests between the activity of the scientific community and the concerns of the Christian religion. As a good example, the current controversy over human and animal cloning is in the scientific community a futile and irrelevant one since, it is known that, animal hybrids are produced on a regular basis in biological experiments; as such, humans who are seen as no different from other species, should not be regarded and awarded a special status. Hence, much of the scientific community is quite oblivious to the guidelines set by the Magisterium and sees its efforts as stunting the advances of science towards progress and knowledge.

But more precisely, let us tackle once again the issue of the philosophy that forms the world view of the natural sciences. The natural sciences are like, any human endeavor, defined in terms of a specific philosophical and even metaphysical position. What must be said however, is that, science in general, reveals a commitment to a world view that is oblivious or in the eyes of some atheists, antithetical to the reality of the supernatural. Naturalism, is adopted both as a method of inquiry and also as a source of explanation. In the face of natural phenomena, scientists seek natural causes for their explanation. And in this, they do well since, there is in this respect, the assumption that, the cause and the effect are related by the same nature. However, the difficulty comes in when naturalism is adopted as a world view, that is, a metaphysical understanding of reality. This is naturalism, in its most authentic expression and as you can see, it poses a serious problem to the rationality of God as a causal agent in creation. Indeed, it poses the phenomena perceived by the scientific method as accounting for the whole of reality. The problem lies in the sense that, scientists seem unaware of the fact, by the very practice of the scientific method, there comes a limitation on their ability to explain the whole of reality using only natural causes. But to the common man, such distinctions are hardly ever noticed. Hence, there comes the assumption that since science has accounted for the causes behind the phenomena occurring in nature, then, such an investigation is exhaustive.

Clearly, this is detrimental to the cause of the faith and a greater appreciation of the fact that the questions raised by science need to find adequate philosophical exposition. It is in this sense then, that, the natural sciences unconsciously or consciously, oppose the province of faith. Faith, in fact, since the time of the Renaissance, has been divorced from reason. Since that time, scientists have sought to explain the world using their reason alone apart from the living Tradition and the indications contained within Sacred Scripture. And this, is the problem: human reason left to its own powers is able to arrive at the truth, but at the same time, it is prone to error. This reality, I believe, is one that is not asserted enough in current times. This means that, science standing apart from the wisdom of the Church, is in danger of promoting error and misunderstanding due to the fact that, human beings are ignorant. Also, and this applies more specifically to the issue of the theory of evolution; since God is the author of the world, a simple question may be asked: must have God used natural causes alone to create, or instead, did He create directly in such manner that, creation cannot be understood without reference to Him. If indeed, God used natural causes alone to create then, it is possible for science on its own powers to arrive at the truth. But if creation has come out of his hands directly, as accounted for in the Book of Genesis, then, it is impossible to understand creation without recourse and reference to God. And in this sense, it must be said that natural history and human history which evolution attempts to account for on its own, can only be truly understood when there has been recourse to the Magisterium. The crux of argument is therefore this: in order to exclude error from scientific investigation, it is necessary to refer to the living Tradition of the Church and the Sacred Scriptures.

For example, let us suppose that the Lord created all animals directly - as I believe, the Sacred Scriptures reveal. In this hypothesis, it is certain that, the manner in which God created them must have been different than the hypothesis that is surmised by Darwinian evolution. In this respect, it is certain that the process must not have taken eons to work itself out, but must have occurred instantaneously. In this sense then, God must have created according to laws which, in reality, might be unknown to us. But if indeed, God created all species according to "their kind", then it must be said that evolution in the sense of macro-evolution or transformism, did not occur. In my opinion, the Sacred Scriptures and the Tradition of the Church point to this reality: God created the animals on the sixth day of creation according to laws known to Him and in accordance to His plan, and all of them were created according to "their kind", meaning that, they were full, complete species. Now, it is certain that his particular point of view is not shared by all. Faced with the evidence of the fossil record, many are those who are convinced of the rationality of supporting Darwinian evolution as the most adequate theory to account for the observations found in the natural world. Others, in an attempt to reconcile their faith to secular science, favor a theistic form of evolution, in which God is the initiator and the supervisor of the evolutionary process. Certainly, I do not share any of the above views.

Finally, going back to my previous point concerning the world view that forms the bias of science; it must be said that, naturalism does not necessarily equate itself with materialism. Indeed, it is possible to be a naturalist and still adhere to the reality that, for example, man is a composite of body and of soul. As such, spirituality can still exists even a universe in which there is no God as demonstrated by pantheism and other forms of religion. However, in current times, naturalism has given birth - in my understanding - to materialism, the conviction that, only matter exists and that the spirit or more precisely, the mind, is an epiphenomenon of matter. The following is presented to you for your examination, it speaks of the inherent bias that pervades the scientific community and the commitment that many have made on a priori grounds, to a materialistic world view:

‘We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism.
It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.
The eminent Kant scholar Lewis Beck used to say that anyone who could believe in God could believe in anything. To appeal to an omnipotent deity is to allow that at any moment the regularities of nature may be ruptured, that Miracles may happen [but see the difference between origin and operational science—Ed.].’

--- Professor Richard Lewontin, a geneticist (and self-proclaimed Marxist)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Evolution - by mirarivos - 10-21-2010, 10:21 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-21-2010, 10:26 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-21-2010, 09:26 PM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 10-21-2010, 09:29 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-21-2010, 09:36 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-21-2010, 09:48 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-22-2010, 10:35 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-22-2010, 10:40 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 12:27 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-23-2010, 04:33 AM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 10-23-2010, 07:57 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-23-2010, 10:26 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 10:34 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 10:36 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 10:41 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-23-2010, 10:50 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 10:52 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-23-2010, 10:58 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 11:20 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-23-2010, 11:28 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-23-2010, 11:30 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-23-2010, 11:34 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 11:40 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 11:53 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 12:25 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-23-2010, 12:30 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-23-2010, 04:26 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 05:46 PM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 10-23-2010, 06:55 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-23-2010, 07:29 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-23-2010, 11:47 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-24-2010, 08:13 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-25-2010, 09:01 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-25-2010, 09:01 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-25-2010, 09:10 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-25-2010, 09:22 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-25-2010, 09:55 PM
Re: Evolution - by ggreg - 10-26-2010, 06:18 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-26-2010, 08:15 AM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 10-26-2010, 09:27 AM
Re: Evolution - by SaintSebastian - 10-26-2010, 10:57 AM
Re: Evolution - by SaintSebastian - 10-26-2010, 11:04 AM
Re: Evolution - by formerbuddhist - 10-28-2010, 08:08 PM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 10-28-2010, 09:14 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-28-2010, 09:39 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-28-2010, 09:44 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-28-2010, 09:50 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-28-2010, 10:02 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-28-2010, 10:09 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-28-2010, 10:28 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-29-2010, 08:09 AM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 10-29-2010, 03:37 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-29-2010, 05:09 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-29-2010, 05:19 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-29-2010, 08:59 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-29-2010, 09:03 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-30-2010, 06:14 AM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 10-30-2010, 08:48 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-30-2010, 09:21 AM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 10-30-2010, 09:30 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-30-2010, 09:34 AM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 10-30-2010, 09:42 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-30-2010, 09:45 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-30-2010, 09:55 AM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 10-30-2010, 10:12 AM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 10-30-2010, 11:45 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-30-2010, 12:09 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-30-2010, 04:41 PM
Re: Evolution - by Cambrensis - 10-30-2010, 04:48 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-30-2010, 04:55 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-30-2010, 05:21 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-30-2010, 05:43 PM
Re: Evolution - by Cambrensis - 10-30-2010, 07:19 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-30-2010, 07:30 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-30-2010, 07:31 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-30-2010, 07:33 PM
Re: Evolution - by Cambrensis - 10-30-2010, 08:12 PM
Re: Evolution - by Cambrensis - 10-30-2010, 08:12 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-31-2010, 06:23 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-31-2010, 06:44 AM
Re: Evolution - by Cambrensis - 10-31-2010, 08:56 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-31-2010, 09:39 AM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 10-31-2010, 10:13 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-31-2010, 10:26 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-31-2010, 10:43 AM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-31-2010, 10:53 AM
Re: Evolution - by Cambrensis - 10-31-2010, 01:27 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 10-31-2010, 02:30 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-31-2010, 05:34 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 10-31-2010, 05:35 PM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 10-31-2010, 05:36 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 10-31-2010, 05:50 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 11-01-2010, 04:08 PM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 11-01-2010, 04:58 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 11-01-2010, 05:25 PM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 11-01-2010, 05:37 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 11-01-2010, 11:38 PM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 11-02-2010, 03:45 PM
Re: Evolution - by Cambrensis - 11-02-2010, 07:14 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 11-02-2010, 08:07 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 11-02-2010, 09:13 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 11-02-2010, 09:16 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 11-03-2010, 01:05 AM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 11-03-2010, 08:00 AM
Re: Evolution - by Cambrensis - 11-03-2010, 03:47 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 11-03-2010, 04:09 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 11-03-2010, 06:04 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 11-03-2010, 06:49 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 11-03-2010, 08:44 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 11-05-2010, 05:02 PM
Re: Evolution - by Mixolydian - 11-20-2010, 01:06 AM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 11-20-2010, 11:06 PM
Re: Evolution - by Mixolydian - 11-21-2010, 03:19 AM
Re: Evolution - by steph_86 - 11-30-2010, 09:19 PM
Re: Evolution - by steph_86 - 11-30-2010, 09:46 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-01-2010, 10:50 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-01-2010, 06:22 PM
Re: Evolution - by steph_86 - 12-01-2010, 09:25 PM
Re: Evolution - by formerbuddhist - 12-22-2010, 07:16 PM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 12-22-2010, 07:27 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-22-2010, 08:33 PM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 12-22-2010, 10:32 PM
Re: Evolution - by formerbuddhist - 12-22-2010, 10:33 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-23-2010, 09:03 PM
Re: Evolution - by InNomineDomini - 12-23-2010, 09:46 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-23-2010, 10:53 PM
Re: Evolution - by InNomineDomini - 12-23-2010, 10:59 PM
Re: Evolution - by Gladium - 12-23-2010, 11:13 PM
Re: Evolution - by dnu - 12-24-2010, 01:38 AM
Re: Evolution - by InNomineDomini - 12-24-2010, 01:51 AM
Re: Evolution - by sheep101 - 12-24-2010, 06:01 AM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 12-24-2010, 11:35 AM
Re: Evolution - by DrBombay - 12-24-2010, 11:58 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-25-2010, 07:24 AM
Re: Evolution - by Gladium - 12-25-2010, 03:37 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-26-2010, 08:19 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-26-2010, 08:57 AM
Re: Evolution - by faith3faith - 12-26-2010, 10:58 AM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 12-26-2010, 11:07 AM
Re: Evolution - by steph_86 - 12-26-2010, 06:26 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-27-2010, 07:19 AM
Re: Evolution - by icecream - 12-27-2010, 07:34 AM
Re: Evolution - by Gladium - 12-27-2010, 03:22 PM
Re: Evolution - by Thomist7735 - 12-28-2010, 03:23 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-28-2010, 06:04 PM
Re: Evolution - by Gladium - 12-28-2010, 06:26 PM
Re: Evolution - by icecream - 12-28-2010, 06:31 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-28-2010, 06:43 PM
Re: Evolution - by Gladium - 12-28-2010, 06:46 PM
Re: Evolution - by Thomist7735 - 12-28-2010, 10:47 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-28-2010, 10:58 PM
Re: Evolution - by devotedknuckles - 12-28-2010, 11:01 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-28-2010, 11:15 PM
Re: Evolution - by devotedknuckles - 12-28-2010, 11:17 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-28-2010, 11:18 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-28-2010, 11:18 PM
Re: Evolution - by devotedknuckles - 12-28-2010, 11:40 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-29-2010, 07:19 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-29-2010, 07:23 AM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 12-29-2010, 01:32 PM
Re: Evolution - by faith3faith - 12-29-2010, 01:55 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 12-29-2010, 03:20 PM
Re: Evolution - by Cambrensis - 12-29-2010, 04:14 PM
Re: Evolution - by Thomist7735 - 12-29-2010, 04:49 PM
Re: Evolution - by James02 - 12-29-2010, 11:59 PM
Re: Evolution - by James02 - 12-30-2010, 12:08 AM
Re: Evolution - by James02 - 12-30-2010, 01:56 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-30-2010, 07:26 AM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 12-30-2010, 03:54 PM
Re: Evolution - by devotedknuckles - 12-30-2010, 04:44 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-30-2010, 05:28 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 12-30-2010, 05:32 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-30-2010, 05:34 PM
Re: Evolution - by Gladium - 12-30-2010, 05:43 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-30-2010, 05:59 PM
Re: Evolution - by Resurrexi - 12-30-2010, 07:26 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 12-30-2010, 07:46 PM
Re: Evolution - by InNomineDomini - 12-31-2010, 12:51 AM
Re: Evolution - by Resurrexi - 12-31-2010, 05:06 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 12-31-2010, 08:01 AM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 12-31-2010, 08:53 AM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 12-31-2010, 09:07 AM
Re: Evolution - by InNomineDomini - 12-31-2010, 08:07 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-31-2010, 08:28 PM
Re: Evolution - by InNomineDomini - 12-31-2010, 08:35 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 12-31-2010, 08:43 PM
Re: Evolution - by violet - 12-31-2010, 08:57 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-31-2010, 09:16 PM
Re: Evolution - by violet - 12-31-2010, 09:20 PM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 12-31-2010, 09:25 PM
Re: Evolution - by The Catholic Thinker - 12-31-2010, 09:45 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 01-01-2011, 07:59 AM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 01-01-2011, 08:42 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 01-01-2011, 09:15 AM
Re: Evolution - by Grasshopper - 01-01-2011, 12:51 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 01-01-2011, 02:03 PM
Re: Evolution - by justlurking - 01-01-2011, 05:35 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 01-01-2011, 06:07 PM
Re: Evolution - by Christus Imperat - 01-01-2011, 07:55 PM
Re: Evolution - by Resurrexi - 01-02-2011, 04:13 AM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 01-02-2011, 06:35 AM
Re: Evolution - by InNomineDomini - 01-02-2011, 06:21 PM
Re: Evolution - by cathkath - 01-02-2011, 07:45 PM
Re: Evolution - by CrusaderKing - 01-02-2011, 09:21 PM
Re: Evolution - by steph_86 - 01-02-2011, 11:53 PM
Re: Evolution - by James02 - 01-03-2011, 03:09 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 01-04-2011, 05:28 PM
Re: Evolution - by DrBombay - 01-04-2011, 11:32 PM
Re: Evolution - by Nic - 01-05-2011, 12:57 PM
Re: Evolution - by InNomineDomini - 01-06-2011, 12:49 AM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 01-06-2011, 01:37 AM
Re: Evolution - by InNomineDomini - 01-06-2011, 01:46 AM
Re: Evolution - by Vetus Ordo - 01-06-2011, 11:33 AM
Re: Evolution - by cherylfoster - 01-07-2011, 11:53 AM
Re: Evolution - by steph_86 - 01-16-2011, 03:01 PM
Re: Evolution - by Metatron - 01-19-2011, 04:47 AM
Re: Evolution - by DrBombay - 02-19-2011, 02:26 AM
Re: Evolution - by someguy - 04-04-2011, 06:11 PM
Re: Evolution - by Crusading Philologist - 04-04-2011, 06:19 PM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 04-04-2011, 06:24 PM
Re: Evolution - by Crusading Philologist - 04-04-2011, 06:30 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 04-04-2011, 06:32 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 04-04-2011, 06:33 PM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 04-04-2011, 06:38 PM
Re: Evolution - by Crusading Philologist - 04-04-2011, 07:02 PM
Re: Evolution - by INPEFESS - 04-04-2011, 07:13 PM
Re: Evolution - by Crusading Philologist - 04-04-2011, 07:24 PM
Re: Evolution - by Historian - 04-04-2011, 08:47 PM
Re: Evolution - by twinc - 04-05-2011, 01:33 PM
Re: Evolution - by twinc - 04-05-2011, 01:48 PM
Re: Evolution - by someguy - 04-05-2011, 03:45 PM
Re: Evolution - by catholicSD - 04-05-2011, 05:40 PM
Re: Evolution - by Bminor Mass - 04-09-2011, 08:34 AM
Re: Evolution - by mikemac - 04-15-2011, 03:12 AM
Re: Evolution - by ggreg - 04-15-2011, 09:59 AM
Re: Evolution - by Bminor Mass - 04-16-2011, 11:31 AM
Re: Evolution - by someguy - 04-21-2011, 11:51 AM
Re: Evolution - by UnamSanctam - 04-21-2011, 12:00 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)