The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all"

Thread Modes

The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all"

Justin Offline

Offline

Posts: 1,808
Threads: 57
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: May 2010

#13

12-12-2010, 02:18 PM (This post was last modified: 12-12-2010, 02:25 PM by Justin.)

Catholic apologist John Salza has an interesting take on this issue. He seems to have a good argument for the validity of the NO cosecration formula. However he concludes saying even this opinion is not certain. http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives...multis.htm

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Zakhur - 11-30-2010, 07:52 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 11-30-2010, 08:07 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 11-30-2010, 08:09 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 11-30-2010, 10:27 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by INPEFESS - 11-30-2010, 10:47 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Zakhur - 11-30-2010, 11:31 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by MMLJ - 12-03-2010, 05:25 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-08-2010, 05:56 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-09-2010, 12:43 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by NorthernTrad - 12-09-2010, 11:01 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Zakhur - 12-10-2010, 08:48 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-12-2010, 12:37 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Justin - 12-12-2010, 02:18 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-12-2010, 05:29 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by AxxeArp - 12-12-2010, 06:20 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-12-2010, 06:24 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Grasshopper - 12-12-2010, 06:45 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-12-2010, 06:50 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Grasshopper - 12-12-2010, 06:54 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-12-2010, 06:56 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Grasshopper - 12-12-2010, 07:18 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-12-2010, 08:46 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-12-2010, 08:49 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-14-2010, 10:54 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-17-2010, 01:40 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-17-2010, 03:15 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-17-2010, 06:46 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 12-17-2010, 07:17 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by SouthpawLink - 12-17-2010, 09:14 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 01:15 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-18-2010, 01:19 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 12-18-2010, 02:18 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-18-2010, 07:43 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 12-18-2010, 10:38 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 10:48 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 12-18-2010, 11:16 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 11:19 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Melkite - 12-18-2010, 11:32 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 11:39 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-18-2010, 12:12 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Justin - 12-18-2010, 12:16 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 12:37 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-18-2010, 12:42 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 01:05 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-18-2010, 01:19 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-18-2010, 01:28 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Justin - 12-18-2010, 01:36 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-18-2010, 01:58 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by SouthpawLink - 12-18-2010, 02:25 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-18-2010, 06:32 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-18-2010, 07:52 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-20-2010, 01:38 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 02:53 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 05:07 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 05:21 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 08:57 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 09:05 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 09:35 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 10:16 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 10:35 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 11:54 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 12:06 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 12:14 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 12:19 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 12:50 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 01:28 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 01:38 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 01:38 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Vetus Ordo - 12-20-2010, 02:18 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Stubborn - 12-20-2010, 02:19 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-20-2010, 05:42 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-20-2010, 05:44 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-20-2010, 11:49 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-21-2010, 01:52 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Vetus Ordo - 12-21-2010, 06:06 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-21-2010, 06:22 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-21-2010, 06:37 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-21-2010, 09:36 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-22-2010, 12:37 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 09:53 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 10:09 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 10:12 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-22-2010, 02:16 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-22-2010, 05:46 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-22-2010, 06:01 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 09:32 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 09:56 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-22-2010, 11:21 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-22-2010, 11:34 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-23-2010, 01:37 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-23-2010, 04:21 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-24-2010, 08:35 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-25-2010, 04:35 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-27-2010, 01:22 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Bakuryokuso - 12-27-2010, 03:34 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Gilgamesh - 12-27-2010, 05:50 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-28-2010, 08:26 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-29-2010, 03:04 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Justin - 12-29-2010, 04:46 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-29-2010, 04:59 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Justin - 12-29-2010, 05:26 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-29-2010, 06:22 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-29-2010, 06:28 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by charlesh - 12-30-2010, 03:56 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-30-2010, 07:31 AM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by charlesh - 12-30-2010, 01:36 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-30-2010, 03:10 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by ripmarcel - 12-30-2010, 05:05 PM

Re: The translation of "pro multis" as "for many" vs. "for all" - by Historian - 12-30-2010, 05:43 PM

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Tweets by FishEaters