Fish Eaters Ranking
#21
Congrats! Salute
Reply
#22
nice! Cheers!
Reply
#23
Sip SIP
Reply
#24
Long live FE.
Reply
#25
So that why Catholicculture.org listed Fisheaters as "Dangerous", we're dangerous to their position in the ranking!

Reply
#26
(02-08-2011, 02:27 AM)Master_P Wrote: So that why Catholicculture.org listed Fisheaters as "Dangerous", we're dangerous to their position in the ranking!

Really? Link!
Reply
#27
(02-08-2011, 03:28 AM)Iuvenalis Wrote:
(02-08-2011, 02:27 AM)Master_P Wrote: So that why Catholicculture.org listed Fisheaters as "Dangerous", we're dangerous to their position in the ranking!

Really? Link!

I'm not sure if this is what Master_P was talking about, but I found this page:

http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/r...ecnum=1915
Reply
#28
(02-08-2011, 03:36 AM)Vivace Wrote:
(02-08-2011, 03:28 AM)Iuvenalis Wrote:
(02-08-2011, 02:27 AM)Master_P Wrote: So that why Catholicculture.org listed Fisheaters as "Dangerous", we're dangerous to their position in the ranking!

Really? Link!

I'm not sure if this is what Master_P was talking about, but I found this page:

http://www.catholicculture.org/culture/r...ecnum=1915

Frankly, I'm not surprised.  Rolling eyes This is pretty much a haven for those who had to flee from other forums because of tyrannical modernism.
Reply
#29
(02-07-2011, 06:50 AM)Rosarium Wrote:
(02-07-2011, 06:47 AM)Exilenomore Wrote: Wow, that's a great reminder of the fact that many people actually read what is said on here.

And it should stress the importance of writing things worth reading on this forum.

At the very least, it should stress the importance of writing readable things on this forum...
(02-07-2011, 11:40 PM)devotedknuckles Wrote: Sip SIP


LOL
Reply
#30
I wonder if FE will drop now that icecream isn't posting 41 times a day.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)