02-21-2011, 07:58 PM
(02-21-2011, 07:54 PM)voxpopulisuxx Wrote:(02-21-2011, 07:29 PM)QuisUtDeus Wrote:Like Vat 2 deliberately vague while at the same time pretending to be authoritative. The Modern CCC is a modernist contraption and a whole thread could be started about whether catchicisms are always infallible. Seems mixed up pussy footing around to me. Homosexual persons? what is that and around we go again. ::)(02-21-2011, 07:19 PM)Habitual_Ritual Wrote: In terms of the OP then this is worth posting from the CCC if indeed it hasn't already:
Yeah, like I said, I don't see mixed signals from the Church on this issue. I think some people are just ignoring it, and that includes some bishops and priests.
I didn't read any ambiguity into the current CCCs definition and opinion of Homosexuality.Yes,the 1980s CCC has ambiguity in relation to other matters (secret societies for example) however