There is No Such Thing as a Homosexual Catholic Priest
(02-23-2011, 10:08 AM)voxpopulisuxx Wrote: Yes but does the danger lie in its subtlety. Because it may seem to you as an obvious break from traditional (small t) Church understanding, but as you can see from this thread that very well informed Catholics (and Quis is an extremely well informed and Rock solid Catholic) dont see what your getting at, and even feel you are being a hater or judgmental (more subtle flawlessly undetected modernist  indoctrination?)

I can say I have detected this throughout Quis' posts.  He seems very orthodox, Traditional, until it comes to this isue, and suddenly the Modernists are right and Tradition is wrong.  A revealing case study on how deeply the Modernists have made their infiltration.

Quote:Ever since I woke up to my faith I noticed a the grace given to me to see subtle subtext and agendas in the way people, politicians, etc  and the mass media uses words. The very term Homosexual and Gay etc being political nomenclature hoisted on society to promote naturalism and in the 20th century out in out support FOR sodomy. I wont even use the word Gay unless absolutely necessary and as I posted above the very term homosexual is an Orwellian mind screw word. Its like a clever script virus, that every time it is used your mind becomes desensitized to the ugliness of the sin of sodomy, till you come to a point your watching Will and Grace (ever think about the title of that show about two sodomites and a fornicating woman) and laughing out loud looking forward to the next installment. A modern equivalent  is a show called Modern Family which features two sodomites who adopt a child.

Gay is an outworking of the pseudo-technical term, homosexual.  I refuse to use it, ever, unless quoting or mocking.  Sodomy is the correct (English) technical term, which obviously links it to the wrath of God.  That is what it is, and where it belongs.  Mind-screw, while a vulgar colloquial description, is apt as a non-technical definition of this wicked sophistry.

Quote:Me personally (and this is another thread) I feel the Modern CCC is completely shot through with modernist heresy disguised in just the kind of subtlety at discussion here.
The Term Homosexual Persons...taken on its face...clearly denotes (again its subtle to many) a new form or third kind of person. One proof is there is no corrallary term for anyone addicted to other sins...we dont see "thieving persons" or "Non Mass attending Persons" etc  Should abortionists who repent of their bloody trade be considered "murdering persons".

Concur - the problem - as with Vatican II - is that there are many solid, orthodox concepts explained therein.  This is the deviousness of the Modernist - to mix orthodoxy with error.  Its a horrible predicament to put the Faithful in - and the architects of this confusion will have to answer to an angry God one day soon.

Quote:In short I would like to put a sentance out there and tell me if Im right.
Homosexuals cant be Christians for the same reason Unicorns cant be Christians, there is no such species.
Does that make sense?
 That's one way of explaining it, Vox.  My explanation was that no one born again in baptism can be identified by a mortal sin.  But you are on solid footing.  

Messages In This Thread
Re: There is No Such Thing as a Homosexual Catholic Priest - by Catholic Johnny - 02-23-2011, 10:57 AM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)