Why not EMHC's
#28
(04-15-2011, 01:29 PM)AxxeArp Wrote: Its funny how this path smells a lot like Jansensim. Don't any of you dare receive Holy Communion unless you are absolutely pure and guiltless! Let's not encourage frequent communion with and also encourage more frequent confession and better preaching on sin from pulpit, instead lets stick our nose up at everyone and encourage very limited communion, lets deny the sick among us the reception of the Divine physician!

"Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord. But let a man prove himself: and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of the chalice. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to himself, not discerning the body of the Lord." (1 Cor 11:27-29)

The frequence of eucharistic sacrileges today is greater than ever. Only someone willfully blind would deny it. Whilst there are undeniable benefits for a soul who practices frequent communion, this is ONLY IF it's done properly. The obvious argument here is that it's seldom done. Even the liturgy itself has suffered from this obsession about frequent communion and many faithful feel that they haven't been to mass if they don't receive communion.

It's a sad state of affairs.

"Let them alone: they are blind, and leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both will fall into the pit." (Matt 15:14)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not EMHC's - by Petertherock - 04-14-2011, 10:01 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Bakuryokuso - 04-14-2011, 10:15 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by The_Harlequin_King - 04-14-2011, 10:19 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Resurrexi - 04-14-2011, 10:28 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Historian - 04-14-2011, 10:29 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by bkovacs - 04-14-2011, 10:30 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Vetus Ordo - 04-14-2011, 10:31 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Historian - 04-14-2011, 10:33 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Resurrexi - 04-14-2011, 10:33 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Resurrexi - 04-14-2011, 10:36 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Vetus Ordo - 04-14-2011, 10:44 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Resurrexi - 04-14-2011, 10:53 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by NorthernTrad - 04-14-2011, 10:56 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Petertherock - 04-14-2011, 11:02 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Vetus Ordo - 04-14-2011, 11:04 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by CollegeCatholic - 04-14-2011, 11:07 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Resurrexi - 04-14-2011, 11:13 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Vetus Ordo - 04-14-2011, 11:18 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Resurrexi - 04-14-2011, 11:22 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by The_Harlequin_King - 04-15-2011, 01:55 AM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Bakuryokuso - 04-15-2011, 08:36 AM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Augstine Baker - 04-15-2011, 10:25 AM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by AxxeArp - 04-15-2011, 01:29 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by AxxeArp - 04-15-2011, 01:30 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by AxxeArp - 04-15-2011, 01:33 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by The_Harlequin_King - 04-15-2011, 01:41 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by AxxeArp - 04-15-2011, 01:49 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Vetus Ordo - 04-15-2011, 01:50 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by newyorkcatholic - 04-15-2011, 01:55 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by Christus Imperat - 04-15-2011, 02:43 PM
Re: Why not EMHC's - by newyorkcatholic - 04-15-2011, 02:47 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)