Chalcedon
#50
Okay, I accept the tome of Leo, but I think it is poorly worded. THere is a reason all the Nestorians accepted it as well, including Nestorius himself. Because there was a Nestorianizing Tendency in its interpretation, The second Council of Constantinople was called.

And yes, That council taught that we distinguish between the natures only abstractly speaking, because they are not separate, they have been made one in a hypostatic union. But this union is without confusion,change division or separation.

See:

Capitula VII.

"If anyone using the expression, "in two natures," does not confess that our one Lord Jesus Christ has been revealed in the divinity and in the humanity, so as to designate by that expression a difference of the natures of which an ineffable union is unconfusedly made, [a union] in which neither the nature of the Word was changed into that of the flesh, nor that of the flesh into that of the Word, for each remained that it was by nature, the union being hypostatic; but shall take the expression with regard to the mystery of Christ in a sense so as to divide the parties, or recognising the two natures in the only Lord Jesus, God the Word made man, does not content himself with taking in a theoretical manner(2) the difference of the natures which compose him, which difference is not destroyed by the union between them, for one is composed of the two and the two are in one, but shall make use of the number [two] to divide the natures or to make of them Persons properly so called: let him be anathema.(3)

The differences are real and to be distinguished, but only in theoria, in theory; For one Christ performs all the acts of Divinity and Humanity, the natures do not act independently. And it is proper for One person to have one nature, so we speak of one nature of the Word Incarnate: THat is, God-made-man Has one nature: The Nature of Divinity that has been ineffably united to the nature of humanity, but without fusion. The union is a true and real union that is hypostatic: That is, there are no longer two individuated subsistences, but only one subsistent being: The Word made Flesh.

Just as I am one man with one nature, that of Body and Soul, So there is one Christ from two natures that have come together into one being: The Word Incarnate.

This is classical Alexandrian Orthodoxy, Which Rome has accepted as just as Valid as the Tome of Leo.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Chalcedon - by randomtradguy - 04-26-2011, 01:04 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by spasiisochrani - 04-26-2011, 01:53 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by SaintSebastian - 04-26-2011, 02:36 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Melkite - 04-26-2011, 04:26 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by SaintSebastian - 04-26-2011, 04:40 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Vetus Ordo - 04-26-2011, 04:41 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Resurrexi - 04-26-2011, 05:20 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 04-26-2011, 05:23 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 04-26-2011, 05:25 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Resurrexi - 04-26-2011, 05:27 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by randomtradguy - 04-26-2011, 07:59 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Melkite - 04-27-2011, 01:15 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by 3Sanctus - 04-27-2011, 01:23 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Dusty_Bottoms - 04-27-2011, 10:11 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by SaintSebastian - 04-27-2011, 10:54 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 04-27-2011, 04:50 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by SouthpawLink - 04-27-2011, 05:50 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 04-27-2011, 07:06 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by SouthpawLink - 04-27-2011, 07:43 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 04-27-2011, 10:46 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by SouthpawLink - 04-28-2011, 12:39 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by randomtradguy - 05-03-2011, 11:21 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Landelinus - 05-03-2011, 11:48 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by SaintSebastian - 05-03-2011, 12:51 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Melkite - 05-03-2011, 02:20 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-03-2011, 04:16 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Melkite - 05-03-2011, 04:43 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-03-2011, 04:45 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by SaintSebastian - 05-03-2011, 04:47 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Melkite - 05-03-2011, 04:51 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Melkite - 05-03-2011, 06:28 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-06-2011, 08:46 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-07-2011, 05:43 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-07-2011, 05:47 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-07-2011, 12:25 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-07-2011, 06:13 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-07-2011, 08:16 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by randomtradguy - 05-08-2011, 06:22 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-09-2011, 12:38 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-09-2011, 01:01 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-09-2011, 02:04 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-09-2011, 02:19 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by justlurking - 05-09-2011, 01:56 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by UnamSanctam - 05-09-2011, 02:16 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by UnamSanctam - 05-09-2011, 02:19 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by UnamSanctam - 05-09-2011, 02:20 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-09-2011, 07:02 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-09-2011, 09:40 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-09-2011, 10:49 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-09-2011, 11:13 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-09-2011, 11:22 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-09-2011, 11:36 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-09-2011, 11:58 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-10-2011, 03:05 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-10-2011, 03:16 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-10-2011, 03:46 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-10-2011, 08:26 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-10-2011, 08:28 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-10-2011, 08:51 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-10-2011, 10:48 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-10-2011, 11:15 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-10-2011, 11:35 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Pheo - 05-10-2011, 11:39 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-10-2011, 11:40 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-10-2011, 11:56 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-11-2011, 12:02 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-11-2011, 12:02 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Pheo - 05-11-2011, 12:09 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Walty - 05-11-2011, 12:15 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-11-2011, 12:21 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-11-2011, 12:38 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-11-2011, 12:52 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Pheo - 05-11-2011, 12:56 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-11-2011, 01:06 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Pheo - 05-11-2011, 01:15 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-11-2011, 01:34 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-11-2011, 01:36 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-11-2011, 02:40 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by randomtradguy - 05-11-2011, 04:23 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by UnamSanctam - 05-11-2011, 06:39 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-11-2011, 07:15 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by randomtradguy - 05-17-2011, 12:24 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by UnamSanctam - 05-17-2011, 01:09 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by randomtradguy - 05-28-2011, 04:22 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by UnamSanctam - 05-28-2011, 05:41 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-28-2011, 07:17 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-28-2011, 07:40 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-28-2011, 08:40 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by UnamSanctam - 05-28-2011, 09:44 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-28-2011, 10:34 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by randomtradguy - 05-29-2011, 03:18 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by aquinas138 - 05-30-2011, 12:23 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Gregory I - 05-30-2011, 01:46 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 05-30-2011, 09:29 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by randomtradguy - 06-03-2011, 11:54 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by UnamSanctam - 06-03-2011, 12:38 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 06-03-2011, 06:34 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by Pheo - 06-03-2011, 06:43 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 06-03-2011, 07:17 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by randomtradguy - 06-03-2011, 08:22 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by aquinas138 - 06-03-2011, 08:35 PM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 06-04-2011, 01:04 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by prack - 06-04-2011, 07:05 AM
Re: Chalcedon - by wulfrano - 06-04-2011, 07:37 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)