Do Trads agree about anything?
#1
http://truerestoration.blogspot.com/2011...about.html
Reply
#2
Forum rules ask you to at least summarize the article although posting the article is full is better. 
Reply
#3
That article does bring up a good point that trads disagree on a lot. But, it greatly exaggerates the differences between the SSPX and  Diocesan Trads.

However, I think 99% of trads will agree that the NO is inferior when compared to the TLM and that the Church has not headed in the best direction these past 40 years. 
Reply
#4
(07-10-2011, 10:12 PM)Someone1776 Wrote: Forum rules ask you to at least summarize the article although posting the article is full is better. 

I agree with that.
Reply
#5
"The New Mass is “defective”


Indult/Motu: No.  The Extraordinary Form of the Mass is extended to the faithful by a gracious permission of the Holy Father.  If one day he chooses to remove that permission, we will obey rather than put ourselves outside the body of the Church.
"


This is wrong...perhaps some it applies to but the vast majority would say yes....And many of those would probably move on to the SSPX etc if the dioc refused Mass...now some of the newer folks the just popped over from an NO to see what's p might not....but some of them will as well...


Trads, by definition agree that the TLM is objectively superior....this is by definition.


Additionally they have a Catholic sense that is in agreement even when they display very loud disagreements about implementation...

There are underlying assuptions about the world that make discussing topics with trads easier than with other people.


It's like being married for a few years or being so like minded that you only have to say a couple of words for the other person to fill in the rest....anyway...don't think I'll make it farther in the article...since I already know trads disagree about stuff.
Reply
#6
Lol, I was just about to post it.  Thanks scipio.
Reply
#7
One thing Trads do agree on, whether they attend a Diocesan TLM, FSSP, ICK, IGS, SSPX, Independent Chapel, SSPV, CMRI, or even the "home aloners" is that they want this nightmare of the last 4-5 decades to end and Tradition to be restored to its rightful place.
Reply
#8
Ha, indeed.

One thing, though, is that every trad I've talked to for a while has ultimately agreed that the minor orders ought to be restored. So, that's something.
Reply
#9
(07-10-2011, 10:32 PM)CrusaderKing Wrote: One thing Trads do agree on, whether they attend a Diocesan TLM, FSSP, ICK, IGS, SSPX, Independent Chapel, SSPV, CMRI, or even the "home aloners" is that they want this nightmare of the last 4-5 decades to end and Tradition to be restored to its rightful place.

Ditto to that.
Reply
#10
Where the Charity and Truth come into play, real Traditionalists don't disagree.  There are some things that men of good will can disagree upon.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)