Canadian Anglicans vote to unite with Rome
#17
(09-11-2011, 03:26 PM)Unum Sint Wrote:
(09-11-2011, 02:50 PM)jovan66102 Wrote: C.S. Lewis was never an Anglo-Catholic. He was a solid, Low Church Anglican who was never able to shake His Church of Ireland roots and the Church of Ireland has never, to my knowledge, had an 'Oxford Movement' or 'Anglo-Catholic Revival'. It always was, and remains, much more 'protestant' than the Church of England. In fact, the anti-Catholic '39 Articles' weren't protestant enough for them, so they added three more making 42 to make them even more anti-Catholic.

Were he alive today, I'm sure he would be horrified at what the CofE and the official Anglican Communion have become, but rather than swimming the Tiber, I think he would probably join one of the Low Church, 'evangelical' split offs or one of the 'semi-schismatic' groups like the 'Southern Cone' or one of the other dioceses (such as Sydney, Australia where they now allow lay people to 'lead the Communion Service'!) which were represented in the Global Anglican Future Conference in 2008.

This makes no sense to me as I have read many of his books and the way he treats the Sacraments (even though in Anglicanism are null and void) he refers to them that would be completely alien to any type of low church Anglican of his time or even today. So he may have been a solid member of low church but he def did not held those believes.

Have you read 'Mere Christianity' in which he espouses the very typical Low Church heresy of indifferentism? No Anglo-Catholic of his time would have written that. They were actually pretty EENS except that they believed in the Branch Theory, whereby Anglicanism and Orthodoxy were the other 'Branches of the Catholic Church'.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Canadian Anglicans vote to unite with Rome - by jovan66102 - 09-11-2011, 03:35 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)