Diocese of Detroit calls Real Catholic TV not a Catholic Organization.
#21
(12-24-2011, 01:38 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:19 PM)Old Salt Wrote: Voris is a Traditional Catholic.
He has told me personally that he never assists at the NO any more.

Not good enough.

NeoCatholic: Any Catholic that thinks the Pope is not a manifest heretic.

Because the pope can never fall into heresy, right?

He's impeccable.
Reply
#22
(12-24-2011, 01:50 PM)Vetus Ordo Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:38 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:19 PM)Old Salt Wrote: Voris is a Traditional Catholic.
He has told me personally that he never assists at the NO any more.

Not good enough.

NeoCatholic: Any Catholic that thinks the Pope is not a manifest heretic.

Because the pope can never fall into heresy, right?

He's impeccable.

Wierd....because someone did not imply that at all in his statement.
Reply
#23
So the archdiocesan 'officials' refused to meet with Mr. Voris?  Hmmm...sounds a bit like the situation with Fr. Frank Pavone with the bishop not speaking to the man personally.

Detroit has been a dying archdiocese for decades; Fr. Hardon used to speak about that and the lengths people had to go to in order to find a reverent and valid Mass.

Michael knows what he is talking about with the condition of the Church and the truth hurts.



On another note to the poster who said that anyone who does not consider the Holy Father a heretic is not a traditional Catholic....count me in that group.  I stand with the successor of Peter, the Vicar of Christ on earth.  Those who don't....well, are they Catholic for it is where you find Peter that you find the Church?  That is the way it has always been and always will be.
Reply
#24
(12-24-2011, 01:48 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:38 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:19 PM)Old Salt Wrote: Voris is a Traditional Catholic.
He has told me personally that he never assists at the NO any more.

Not good enough.

NeoCatholic: Any Catholic that thinks the Pope is not a manifest heretic.
I just think if he is going to critque the leadership of the bishops, he should the Pope as well.

That's fair enough, but it doesn't make him a semi-Catholic.
Reply
#25
(12-24-2011, 01:58 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:48 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:38 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:19 PM)Old Salt Wrote: Voris is a Traditional Catholic.
He has told me personally that he never assists at the NO any more.

Not good enough.

NeoCatholic: Any Catholic that thinks the Pope is not a manifest heretic.
I just think if he is going to critque the leadership of the bishops, he should the Pope as well.

That's fair enough, but it doesn't make him a semi-Catholic.
Then what's the point in bringing up the bishops when most of these men were appointed by the post conciliar Popes. Not to mention the negligence of the Pope's themselves in stopping the revolution in the Church.
Reply
#26
(12-24-2011, 01:50 PM)Vetus Ordo Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:38 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:19 PM)Old Salt Wrote: Voris is a Traditional Catholic.
He has told me personally that he never assists at the NO any more.

Not good enough.

NeoCatholic: Any Catholic that thinks the Pope is not a manifest heretic.

Because the pope can never fall into heresy, right?

He's impeccable.
Pope Benedict XVI has never taught heresy.
Reply
#27
(12-24-2011, 02:06 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:58 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:48 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:38 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:19 PM)Old Salt Wrote: Voris is a Traditional Catholic.
He has told me personally that he never assists at the NO any more.

Not good enough.

NeoCatholic: Any Catholic that thinks the Pope is not a manifest heretic.
I just think if he is going to critque the leadership of the bishops, he should the Pope as well.

That's fair enough, but it doesn't make him a semi-Catholic.
Then what's the point in bringing up the bishops when most of these men were appointed by the post conciliar Popes. Not to mention the negligence of the Pope's themselves in stopping the revolution in the Church.

I think there is a lot to complain about Voris. I would start with his hair. I just think it is silly to pretend he is a modernist because we disagree with his editorial choices.
Reply
#28
(12-24-2011, 02:24 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 02:06 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:58 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:48 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:38 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:19 PM)Old Salt Wrote: Voris is a Traditional Catholic.
He has told me personally that he never assists at the NO any more.

Not good enough.

NeoCatholic: Any Catholic that thinks the Pope is not a manifest heretic.
I just think if he is going to critque the leadership of the bishops, he should the Pope as well.

That's fair enough, but it doesn't make him a semi-Catholic.
Then what's the point in bringing up the bishops when most of these men were appointed by the post conciliar Popes. Not to mention the negligence of the Pope's themselves in stopping the revolution in the Church.

I think there is a lot to complain about Voris. I would start with his hair. I just think it is silly to pretend he is a modernist because we disagree with his editorial choices.
What does his hair have to do with the Faith?
I get your point. :)
Reply
#29
(12-24-2011, 02:24 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 02:06 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:58 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:48 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:38 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:19 PM)Old Salt Wrote: Voris is a Traditional Catholic.
He has told me personally that he never assists at the NO any more.

Not good enough.

NeoCatholic: Any Catholic that thinks the Pope is not a manifest heretic.
I just think if he is going to critque the leadership of the bishops, he should the Pope as well.

That's fair enough, but it doesn't make him a semi-Catholic.
Then what's the point in bringing up the bishops when most of these men were appointed by the post conciliar Popes. Not to mention the negligence of the Pope's themselves in stopping the revolution in the Church.

I think there is a lot to complain about Voris. I would start with his hair. I just think it is silly to pretend he is a modernist because we disagree with his editorial choices.
I don't think he is a modernist. I agree with the hair. Also, the pen should go too !! Reminds me of Bob Dole.
Reply
#30
(12-24-2011, 02:33 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 02:24 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 02:06 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:58 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:48 PM)JMartyr Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:38 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(12-24-2011, 01:19 PM)Old Salt Wrote: Voris is a Traditional Catholic.
He has told me personally that he never assists at the NO any more.

Not good enough.

NeoCatholic: Any Catholic that thinks the Pope is not a manifest heretic.
I just think if he is going to critque the leadership of the bishops, he should the Pope as well.

That's fair enough, but it doesn't make him a semi-Catholic.
Then what's the point in bringing up the bishops when most of these men were appointed by the post conciliar Popes. Not to mention the negligence of the Pope's themselves in stopping the revolution in the Church.

I think there is a lot to complain about Voris. I would start with his hair. I just think it is silly to pretend he is a modernist because we disagree with his editorial choices.
I don't think he is a modernist. I agree with the hair. Also, the pen should go too !! Reminds me of Bob Dole.
So what.
I never notice the pen or hair.
Sheesh!
Maybe Voris has head burns...
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)