Baptism of Desire and Theological Principles by Fr. Cekada
(12-29-2011, 09:33 PM)Grasshopper Wrote:
(12-29-2011, 09:30 PM)Stubborn Wrote:
(12-29-2011, 09:24 PM)Parmandur Wrote:
(12-29-2011, 08:49 PM)Jenn Wrote:
(12-29-2011, 08:45 PM)Parmandur Wrote: Sure, and it has also made it clear that desire for the Sacraments, explicit and implicit, have potentially salvific value.  That Modernists use this as a wedge for indifferentism does not change that this is the case.

The Church cannot make clear that the "desire" for the sacraments suffices without contradicting her own infallible statements to the contrary.

Even though Trent did define just such, as Scriptorum just pointed out?  :eyeroll:

Trent defined what with that canon? That not only are the Sacraments necessary for salvation - (BOD is not a Sacrament) but the "desire" can put one in the state of grace - since when does that equate to defining salvation via BOD?

If it doesn't equate, what's the point? What good is dying in a state of grace if you're going to Hell anyway?

It does not say your going to hell - or heaven - or even that your gonna die. Again, read what it says.

Messages In This Thread
Re: Baptism of Desire and Theological Principles by Fr. Cekada - by Stubborn - 12-29-2011, 09:40 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)