Baptism of Desire: Avoiding the Red Herrings on a Nearby Thread
#29
(01-01-2012, 06:49 PM)Stubborn Wrote:
(01-01-2012, 06:45 PM)Someone1776 Wrote:
(01-01-2012, 06:43 PM)Stubborn Wrote:
(01-01-2012, 03:38 PM)SouthpawLink Wrote: The syllogism argues that Catholics are bound to the de fide and theologically certain  doctrines taught by theologians and that theologians DO teach baptism of desire as being either de fide or theologically certain.  Fr. Cekada then asks which premise do pro-Feeneyites deny.

So we are bound to choose whether to be bound to the OM that teach BOD or the infallible teachings which declare the necessity of water?

Which is your choice?

The magisterium can't contradict itself.  Either the Papacy has been sedevacant since the the reign of Saint Pius V or there is no contradiction. 

Well if the magisterium cannot contradict itself then it should be an easy question to answer no?

Right! 
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Baptism of Desire: Avoiding the Red Herrings on a Nearby Thread - by Someone1776 - 01-01-2012, 07:18 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)